
- <Centre d'Information et de documentation du CRA Rhône-Alpes
- CRA
- Informations pratiques
		- 
						Adresse
						Centre d'information et de documentation Horaires
 du CRA Rhône-Alpes
 Centre Hospitalier le Vinatier
 bât 211
 95, Bd Pinel
 69678 Bron CedexLundi au Vendredi Contact
 9h00-12h00 13h30-16h00Tél: +33(0)4 37 91 54 65 Mail
 Fax: +33(0)4 37 91 54 37
 
- 
						Adresse
						
Auteur Kaitlynn M. P. BAIDEN
|  | 
Documents disponibles écrits par cet auteur (5)
 
                
             
            
                
                     
                
             
						
					
						
							 Faire une suggestion  Affiner la recherche
						
					   Faire une suggestion  Affiner la rechercheBrief Report: Sex/Gender Differences in Adolescents with Autism: Socialization Profiles and Response to Social Skills Intervention / Jordan A. KO in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 52-6 (June 2022)

Titre : Brief Report: Sex/Gender Differences in Adolescents with Autism: Socialization Profiles and Response to Social Skills Intervention Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Jordan A. KO, Auteur ; Rachel K. SCHUCK, Auteur ; MarÃa JIMENEZ-MUÑOZ, Auteur ; Kaitlynn M. P. BAIDEN, Auteur ; Ty W. VERNON, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.2812-2818 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Adolescents Autism spectrum disorder Females Intervention Sex/gender differences Social skills Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Females with autism have unique socialization profiles, but less is known about sex/gender differences in the context of socialization interventions. This study utilized a combination of behavioral and survey measures to examine sex/gender differences in 32 autistic adolescents (10 females, 22 males) before and after participation in the 20-week START socialization program. At intake, males self-reported superior social skills use while parents endorsed that females demonstrated superior social competencies. While males and females both experienced socialization improvements post-trial, females experienced greater increases in self-reported social competency and the proportion of questions they asked during peer conversations. These preliminary findings on differential intervention response may help inform future social skill intervention efforts for the needs of females on the spectrum. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10803-021-05127-0 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=474 
in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders > 52-6 (June 2022) . - p.2812-2818[article] Brief Report: Sex/Gender Differences in Adolescents with Autism: Socialization Profiles and Response to Social Skills Intervention [texte imprimé] / Jordan A. KO, Auteur ; Rachel K. SCHUCK, Auteur ; MarÃa JIMENEZ-MUÑOZ, Auteur ; Kaitlynn M. P. BAIDEN, Auteur ; Ty W. VERNON, Auteur . - p.2812-2818.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders > 52-6 (June 2022) . - p.2812-2818
Mots-clés : Adolescents Autism spectrum disorder Females Intervention Sex/gender differences Social skills Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Females with autism have unique socialization profiles, but less is known about sex/gender differences in the context of socialization interventions. This study utilized a combination of behavioral and survey measures to examine sex/gender differences in 32 autistic adolescents (10 females, 22 males) before and after participation in the 20-week START socialization program. At intake, males self-reported superior social skills use while parents endorsed that females demonstrated superior social competencies. While males and females both experienced socialization improvements post-trial, females experienced greater increases in self-reported social competency and the proportion of questions they asked during peer conversations. These preliminary findings on differential intervention response may help inform future social skill intervention efforts for the needs of females on the spectrum. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10803-021-05127-0 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=474 Neurodiversity and Autism Intervention: Reconciling Perspectives Through a Naturalistic Developmental Behavioral Intervention Framework / Rachel K. SCHUCK in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 52-10 (October 2022)

Titre : Neurodiversity and Autism Intervention: Reconciling Perspectives Through a Naturalistic Developmental Behavioral Intervention Framework Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Rachel K. SCHUCK, Auteur ; Daina M. TAGAVI, Auteur ; Kaitlynn M. P. BAIDEN, Auteur ; Patrick DWYER, Auteur ; Zachary J. WILLIAMS, Auteur ; Anthony OSUNA, Auteur ; Emily F. FERGUSON, Auteur ; Maria JIMENEZ MUÑOZ, Auteur ; Samantha K. POYSER, Auteur ; Joy F. JOHNSON, Auteur ; Ty W. VERNON, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.4625-4645 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Autism Naturalistic developmental behavioral intervention Neurodiversity Autism Center at the University of California, Santa Barbara, a center focused on providing Pivotal Response Treatment, an NDBI. TWV is the center director. TWV, KMPB, MJM, and JFJ are Board Certified Behavior Analysts. PD and ZJW both serve on the autistic researcher review board of the Autism Intervention Research Network on Physical Health (AIR-P), and ZJW is a member of the family advisory committee of the Autism Speaks Autism Learning Health Network Vanderbilt site. ZJW also serves as a consultant for Roche on a project related to behavioral intervention for autism. Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Proponents of autism intervention and those of the neurodiversity movement often appear at odds, the former advocating for intensive treatments and the latter arguing that autism must be accepted as a form of diversity. The history of behavioral intervention has understandably outraged many in the Autistic community, though many still value supports focused on quality of life. This commentary argues that Naturalistic Developmental Behavioral Interventions (NDBIs) hold promise for bridging the gap between early intervention and the neurodiversity movement. However, we recognize NDBIs have much room to grow and suggest multiple strategies for improvement. We believe these updates are not only feasible for clinicians and researchers to implement but will ultimately lead to improved quality of life for Autistic individuals. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10803-021-05316-x Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=486 
in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders > 52-10 (October 2022) . - p.4625-4645[article] Neurodiversity and Autism Intervention: Reconciling Perspectives Through a Naturalistic Developmental Behavioral Intervention Framework [texte imprimé] / Rachel K. SCHUCK, Auteur ; Daina M. TAGAVI, Auteur ; Kaitlynn M. P. BAIDEN, Auteur ; Patrick DWYER, Auteur ; Zachary J. WILLIAMS, Auteur ; Anthony OSUNA, Auteur ; Emily F. FERGUSON, Auteur ; Maria JIMENEZ MUÑOZ, Auteur ; Samantha K. POYSER, Auteur ; Joy F. JOHNSON, Auteur ; Ty W. VERNON, Auteur . - p.4625-4645.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders > 52-10 (October 2022) . - p.4625-4645
Mots-clés : Autism Naturalistic developmental behavioral intervention Neurodiversity Autism Center at the University of California, Santa Barbara, a center focused on providing Pivotal Response Treatment, an NDBI. TWV is the center director. TWV, KMPB, MJM, and JFJ are Board Certified Behavior Analysts. PD and ZJW both serve on the autistic researcher review board of the Autism Intervention Research Network on Physical Health (AIR-P), and ZJW is a member of the family advisory committee of the Autism Speaks Autism Learning Health Network Vanderbilt site. ZJW also serves as a consultant for Roche on a project related to behavioral intervention for autism. Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Proponents of autism intervention and those of the neurodiversity movement often appear at odds, the former advocating for intensive treatments and the latter arguing that autism must be accepted as a form of diversity. The history of behavioral intervention has understandably outraged many in the Autistic community, though many still value supports focused on quality of life. This commentary argues that Naturalistic Developmental Behavioral Interventions (NDBIs) hold promise for bridging the gap between early intervention and the neurodiversity movement. However, we recognize NDBIs have much room to grow and suggest multiple strategies for improvement. We believe these updates are not only feasible for clinicians and researchers to implement but will ultimately lead to improved quality of life for Autistic individuals. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10803-021-05316-x Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=486 Social Validity of Pivotal Response Treatment for Young Autistic Children: Perspectives of Autistic Adults / Patrick DWYER ; Kaitlynn M. P. BAIDEN ; Zachary J. WILLIAMS ; Mian WANG in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 54-2 (February 2024)

Titre : Social Validity of Pivotal Response Treatment for Young Autistic Children: Perspectives of Autistic Adults Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Patrick DWYER, Auteur ; Kaitlynn M. P. BAIDEN, Auteur ; Zachary J. WILLIAMS, Auteur ; Mian WANG, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.423-441 Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : The social validity of autism behavioral intervention has been questioned. Naturalistic Developmental Behavioral Interventions (NDBIs) attempt to address some concerns, but it is unclear whether autistic people consider NDBIs socially valid. Social validity of an NDBI, Pivotal Response Treatment (PRT), was investigated through autistic adults commenting on videos of autistic children receiving PRT. Qualitative coding of responses generated three themes: respect for individuals; assessment of intervention implementation; and socioemotional considerations. Although video brevity limits the scope of the present study?s conclusions, participants highlighted PRT components that appeared socially valid (e.g., reinforcing attempts, following the child?s lead) and aspects appearing invalid (e.g., overemphasis on spoken language). Therefore, adjustments appear necessary for PRT to be fully acceptable to the autistic community. En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-022-05808-4 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=520 
in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders > 54-2 (February 2024) . - p.423-441[article] Social Validity of Pivotal Response Treatment for Young Autistic Children: Perspectives of Autistic Adults [texte imprimé] / Patrick DWYER, Auteur ; Kaitlynn M. P. BAIDEN, Auteur ; Zachary J. WILLIAMS, Auteur ; Mian WANG, Auteur . - p.423-441.
in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders > 54-2 (February 2024) . - p.423-441
Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : The social validity of autism behavioral intervention has been questioned. Naturalistic Developmental Behavioral Interventions (NDBIs) attempt to address some concerns, but it is unclear whether autistic people consider NDBIs socially valid. Social validity of an NDBI, Pivotal Response Treatment (PRT), was investigated through autistic adults commenting on videos of autistic children receiving PRT. Qualitative coding of responses generated three themes: respect for individuals; assessment of intervention implementation; and socioemotional considerations. Although video brevity limits the scope of the present study?s conclusions, participants highlighted PRT components that appeared socially valid (e.g., reinforcing attempts, following the child?s lead) and aspects appearing invalid (e.g., overemphasis on spoken language). Therefore, adjustments appear necessary for PRT to be fully acceptable to the autistic community. En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-022-05808-4 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=520 The Neurodiversity Attitudes Questionnaire: Development and Initial Validation / Rachel K. SCHUCK in Autism, 28-11 (November 2024)

Titre : The Neurodiversity Attitudes Questionnaire: Development and Initial Validation Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Rachel K. SCHUCK, Auteur ; Sunghee CHOI, Auteur ; Kaitlynn M. P. BAIDEN, Auteur ; Patrick DWYER, Auteur ; Mirko ULJAREVIĆ, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.2821 - 2833 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : attitudes helping professionals instrument development neurodiversity Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Neurodiversity refers to the idea that all brains-no matter their differences-are valuable and should be accepted. Attitudes toward the neurodiversity perspective can have real-life impacts on the lives of neurodivergent people, from effects on daily interactions to how professionals deliver services for neurodivergent individuals. In order to identify negative attitudes toward neurodiversity and potentially intervene to improve them, we first need to measure these attitudes. This article describes the development and initial validation of the Neurodiversity Attitudes Questionnaire (NDAQ), including item revision based on expert review, cognitive interviews, systematic evaluation of participants' response process, and analysis of the instrument?s internal factor structure using exploratory structural equation modeling. Pilot analysis with 351 individuals mostly living in the United States who were currently working in or intending to pursue helping professions indicates that the NDAQ has construct validity, is well understood by participants, and fits a five-factor structure. While the NDAQ represents the first instrument designed to specifically assess attitudes toward the neurodiversity perspective, further validation work is still needed. Lay Abstract Neurodiversity refers to the idea that brain differences (including disabilities) are valuable and should be accepted. Attitudes toward neurodiversity can have real-life impacts on the lives of neurodivergent people (those whose brains do not fit society?s "standard"). These impacts can include effects on daily interactions, as well as how professionals such as teachers and doctors deliver services to neurodivergent people. In order to identify negative attitudes toward neurodiversity and potentially improve them, we first need to measure these attitudes. This article describes the development of the Neurodiversity Attitudes Questionnaire (NDAQ). NDAQ development included revision of questionnaire items based on feedback from experts and neurodivergent people, systematically evaluating the way participants responded to questionnaire items, and analysis of how the NDAQ items are grouped into different factors. A preliminary analysis with 351 individuals mostly living in the United States who were currently working or planning to work in a helping profession (e.g. doctors, teachers, therapists, and so on) indicates that the NDAQ measures attitudes toward neurodiversity, is well understood by participants, and fits a five-factor structure. While the NDAQ represents the first instrument designed to specifically assess attitudes toward the broad idea of neurodiversity, further work is still needed. En ligne : https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/13623613241245756 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=537 
in Autism > 28-11 (November 2024) . - p.2821 - 2833[article] The Neurodiversity Attitudes Questionnaire: Development and Initial Validation [texte imprimé] / Rachel K. SCHUCK, Auteur ; Sunghee CHOI, Auteur ; Kaitlynn M. P. BAIDEN, Auteur ; Patrick DWYER, Auteur ; Mirko ULJAREVIĆ, Auteur . - p.2821 - 2833.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Autism > 28-11 (November 2024) . - p.2821 - 2833
Mots-clés : attitudes helping professionals instrument development neurodiversity Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Neurodiversity refers to the idea that all brains-no matter their differences-are valuable and should be accepted. Attitudes toward the neurodiversity perspective can have real-life impacts on the lives of neurodivergent people, from effects on daily interactions to how professionals deliver services for neurodivergent individuals. In order to identify negative attitudes toward neurodiversity and potentially intervene to improve them, we first need to measure these attitudes. This article describes the development and initial validation of the Neurodiversity Attitudes Questionnaire (NDAQ), including item revision based on expert review, cognitive interviews, systematic evaluation of participants' response process, and analysis of the instrument?s internal factor structure using exploratory structural equation modeling. Pilot analysis with 351 individuals mostly living in the United States who were currently working in or intending to pursue helping professions indicates that the NDAQ has construct validity, is well understood by participants, and fits a five-factor structure. While the NDAQ represents the first instrument designed to specifically assess attitudes toward the neurodiversity perspective, further validation work is still needed. Lay Abstract Neurodiversity refers to the idea that brain differences (including disabilities) are valuable and should be accepted. Attitudes toward neurodiversity can have real-life impacts on the lives of neurodivergent people (those whose brains do not fit society?s "standard"). These impacts can include effects on daily interactions, as well as how professionals such as teachers and doctors deliver services to neurodivergent people. In order to identify negative attitudes toward neurodiversity and potentially improve them, we first need to measure these attitudes. This article describes the development of the Neurodiversity Attitudes Questionnaire (NDAQ). NDAQ development included revision of questionnaire items based on feedback from experts and neurodivergent people, systematically evaluating the way participants responded to questionnaire items, and analysis of how the NDAQ items are grouped into different factors. A preliminary analysis with 351 individuals mostly living in the United States who were currently working or planning to work in a helping profession (e.g. doctors, teachers, therapists, and so on) indicates that the NDAQ measures attitudes toward neurodiversity, is well understood by participants, and fits a five-factor structure. While the NDAQ represents the first instrument designed to specifically assess attitudes toward the broad idea of neurodiversity, further work is still needed. En ligne : https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/13623613241245756 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=537 The Social Validity of Behavioral Interventions: Seeking Input from Autistic Adults / Kaitlynn M. P. BAIDEN in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 55-4 (April 2024)

Titre : The Social Validity of Behavioral Interventions: Seeking Input from Autistic Adults Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Kaitlynn M. P. BAIDEN, Auteur ; Zachary J. WILLIAMS, Auteur ; Rachel K. SCHUCK, Auteur ; Patrick DWYER, Auteur ; Mian WANG, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.1172-1186 Langues : Anglais (eng) Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Many in the autistic community have expressed concerns regarding the use of behavioral interventions with autistic children, suggesting that these interventions may not be socially valid. Though behavioral interventions have evolved to be more naturalistic and child-centered, little structured research has been done to explicitly seek autistic perspectives on the acceptability of specific components of behavioral interventions. Autistic adults (N = 235) were recruited online to take the Autism Intervention Attitudes Scale (AIAS), a questionnaire designed to gather feedback on common intervention goals and practices. Results indicate that participants find goals and practices that highlight quality of life, safety, and autistic interactions acceptable, while those that focus on normalization based on neurotypical standards are not. An exploratory graph analysis revealed three communities of goals ("uncontroversial goals", "controversial goals", and "social goals"). Comparison between naturalistic and structured intervention components additionally showed that autistic participants favored naturalistic strategies. These findings are in line with known criticisms of behavioral intervention from autistic adults, but also provide more information on the specific ways in which behavioral interventions can be reformed. This information can guide professionals in the development of appropriate goals and decisions around intervention planning. En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-024-06297-3 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=550 
in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders > 55-4 (April 2024) . - p.1172-1186[article] The Social Validity of Behavioral Interventions: Seeking Input from Autistic Adults [texte imprimé] / Kaitlynn M. P. BAIDEN, Auteur ; Zachary J. WILLIAMS, Auteur ; Rachel K. SCHUCK, Auteur ; Patrick DWYER, Auteur ; Mian WANG, Auteur . - p.1172-1186.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders > 55-4 (April 2024) . - p.1172-1186
Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Many in the autistic community have expressed concerns regarding the use of behavioral interventions with autistic children, suggesting that these interventions may not be socially valid. Though behavioral interventions have evolved to be more naturalistic and child-centered, little structured research has been done to explicitly seek autistic perspectives on the acceptability of specific components of behavioral interventions. Autistic adults (N = 235) were recruited online to take the Autism Intervention Attitudes Scale (AIAS), a questionnaire designed to gather feedback on common intervention goals and practices. Results indicate that participants find goals and practices that highlight quality of life, safety, and autistic interactions acceptable, while those that focus on normalization based on neurotypical standards are not. An exploratory graph analysis revealed three communities of goals ("uncontroversial goals", "controversial goals", and "social goals"). Comparison between naturalistic and structured intervention components additionally showed that autistic participants favored naturalistic strategies. These findings are in line with known criticisms of behavioral intervention from autistic adults, but also provide more information on the specific ways in which behavioral interventions can be reformed. This information can guide professionals in the development of appropriate goals and decisions around intervention planning. En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-024-06297-3 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=550 

