Neurodiversity and Autism Intervention: Reconciling Perspectives Through a Naturalistic Developmental Behavioral Intervention Framework / Rachel K. SCHUCK in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 52-10 (October 2022)  

Public ISBD [article]  inJournal of Autism and Developmental Disorders > 52-10 (October 2022) . - p.4625-4645 Titre : Neurodiversity and Autism Intervention: Reconciling Perspectives Through a Naturalistic Developmental Behavioral Intervention Framework Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Rachel K. SCHUCK, Auteur ; Daina M. TAGAVI, Auteur ; Kaitlynn M. P. BAIDEN, Auteur ; Patrick DWYER, Auteur ; Zachary J. WILLIAMS, Auteur ; Anthony OSUNA, Auteur ; Emily F. FERGUSON, Auteur ; Maria JIMENEZ MUÑOZ, Auteur ; Samantha K. POYSER, Auteur ; Joy F. JOHNSON, Auteur ; Ty W. VERNON, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.4625-4645 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Autism  Naturalistic developmental behavioral intervention  Neurodiversity  Autism Center at the University of California, Santa Barbara, a center focused on  providing Pivotal Response Treatment, an NDBI. TWV is the center director. TWV,  KMPB, MJM, and JFJ are Board Certified Behavior Analysts. PD and ZJW both serve  on the autistic researcher review board of the Autism Intervention Research  Network on Physical Health (AIR-P), and ZJW is a member of the family advisory  committee of the Autism Speaks Autism Learning Health Network Vanderbilt site.  ZJW also serves as a consultant for Roche on a project related to behavioral  intervention for autism. Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Proponents of autism intervention and those of the neurodiversity movement often appear at odds, the former advocating for intensive treatments and the latter arguing that autism must be accepted as a form of diversity. The history of behavioral intervention has understandably outraged many in the Autistic community, though many still value supports focused on quality of life. This commentary argues that Naturalistic Developmental Behavioral Interventions (NDBIs) hold promise for bridging the gap between early intervention and the neurodiversity movement. However, we recognize NDBIs have much room to grow and suggest multiple strategies for improvement. We believe these updates are not only feasible for clinicians and researchers to implement but will ultimately lead to improved quality of life for Autistic individuals. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10803-021-05316-x Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=486 [article] Neurodiversity and Autism Intervention: Reconciling Perspectives Through a Naturalistic Developmental Behavioral Intervention Framework [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Rachel K. SCHUCK, Auteur ; Daina M. TAGAVI, Auteur ; Kaitlynn M. P. BAIDEN, Auteur ; Patrick DWYER, Auteur ; Zachary J. WILLIAMS, Auteur ; Anthony OSUNA, Auteur ; Emily F. FERGUSON, Auteur ; Maria JIMENEZ MUÑOZ, Auteur ; Samantha K. POYSER, Auteur ; Joy F. JOHNSON, Auteur ; Ty W. VERNON, Auteur . - p.4625-4645. Langues : Anglais (eng) in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders > 52-10 (October 2022) . - p.4625-4645 Mots-clés : Autism  Naturalistic developmental behavioral intervention  Neurodiversity  Autism Center at the University of California, Santa Barbara, a center focused on  providing Pivotal Response Treatment, an NDBI. TWV is the center director. TWV,  KMPB, MJM, and JFJ are Board Certified Behavior Analysts. PD and ZJW both serve  on the autistic researcher review board of the Autism Intervention Research  Network on Physical Health (AIR-P), and ZJW is a member of the family advisory  committee of the Autism Speaks Autism Learning Health Network Vanderbilt site.  ZJW also serves as a consultant for Roche on a project related to behavioral  intervention for autism. Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Proponents of autism intervention and those of the neurodiversity movement often appear at odds, the former advocating for intensive treatments and the latter arguing that autism must be accepted as a form of diversity. The history of behavioral intervention has understandably outraged many in the Autistic community, though many still value supports focused on quality of life. This commentary argues that Naturalistic Developmental Behavioral Interventions (NDBIs) hold promise for bridging the gap between early intervention and the neurodiversity movement. However, we recognize NDBIs have much room to grow and suggest multiple strategies for improvement. We believe these updates are not only feasible for clinicians and researchers to implement but will ultimately lead to improved quality of life for Autistic individuals. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10803-021-05316-x Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=486

Social Validity of Pivotal Response Treatment for Young Autistic Children: Perspectives of Autistic Adults / Patrick DWYER ; Kaitlynn M. P. BAIDEN ; Zachary J. WILLIAMS ; Mian WANG in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 54-2 (February 2024)  

Public ISBD [article]  inJournal of Autism and Developmental Disorders > 54-2 (February 2024) . - p.423-441 Titre : Social Validity of Pivotal Response Treatment for Young Autistic Children: Perspectives of Autistic Adults Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Patrick DWYER, Auteur ; Kaitlynn M. P. BAIDEN, Auteur ; Zachary J. WILLIAMS, Auteur ; Mian WANG, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.423-441 Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : The social validity of autism behavioral intervention has been questioned. Naturalistic Developmental Behavioral Interventions (NDBIs) attempt to address some concerns, but it is unclear whether autistic people consider NDBIs socially valid. Social validity of an NDBI, Pivotal Response Treatment (PRT), was investigated through autistic adults commenting on videos of autistic children receiving PRT. Qualitative coding of responses generated three themes: respect for individuals; assessment of intervention implementation; and socioemotional considerations. Although video brevity limits the scope of the present study?s conclusions, participants highlighted PRT components that appeared socially valid (e.g., reinforcing attempts, following the child?s lead) and aspects appearing invalid (e.g., overemphasis on spoken language). Therefore, adjustments appear necessary for PRT to be fully acceptable to the autistic community. En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-022-05808-4 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=520 [article] Social Validity of Pivotal Response Treatment for Young Autistic Children: Perspectives of Autistic Adults [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Patrick DWYER, Auteur ; Kaitlynn M. P. BAIDEN, Auteur ; Zachary J. WILLIAMS, Auteur ; Mian WANG, Auteur . - p.423-441. in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders > 54-2 (February 2024) . - p.423-441 Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : The social validity of autism behavioral intervention has been questioned. Naturalistic Developmental Behavioral Interventions (NDBIs) attempt to address some concerns, but it is unclear whether autistic people consider NDBIs socially valid. Social validity of an NDBI, Pivotal Response Treatment (PRT), was investigated through autistic adults commenting on videos of autistic children receiving PRT. Qualitative coding of responses generated three themes: respect for individuals; assessment of intervention implementation; and socioemotional considerations. Although video brevity limits the scope of the present study?s conclusions, participants highlighted PRT components that appeared socially valid (e.g., reinforcing attempts, following the child?s lead) and aspects appearing invalid (e.g., overemphasis on spoken language). Therefore, adjustments appear necessary for PRT to be fully acceptable to the autistic community. En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-022-05808-4 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=520

The Social Validity of Behavioral Interventions: Seeking Input from Autistic Adults / Kaitlynn M. P. BAIDEN in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 55-4 (April 2024)  

Public ISBD [article]  inJournal of Autism and Developmental Disorders > 55-4 (April 2024) . - p.1172-1186 Titre : The Social Validity of Behavioral Interventions: Seeking Input from Autistic Adults Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Kaitlynn M. P. BAIDEN, Auteur ; Zachary J. WILLIAMS, Auteur ; Rachel K. SCHUCK, Auteur ; Patrick DWYER, Auteur ; Mian WANG, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.1172-1186 Langues : Anglais (eng) Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Many in the autistic community have expressed concerns regarding the use of behavioral interventions with autistic children, suggesting that these interventions may not be socially valid. Though behavioral interventions have evolved to be more naturalistic and child-centered, little structured research has been done to explicitly seek autistic perspectives on the acceptability of specific components of behavioral interventions. Autistic adults (N = 235) were recruited online to take the Autism Intervention Attitudes Scale (AIAS), a questionnaire designed to gather feedback on common intervention goals and practices. Results indicate that participants find goals and practices that highlight quality of life, safety, and autistic interactions acceptable, while those that focus on normalization based on neurotypical standards are not. An exploratory graph analysis revealed three communities of goals ("uncontroversial goals", "controversial goals", and "social goals"). Comparison between naturalistic and structured intervention components additionally showed that autistic participants favored naturalistic strategies. These findings are in line with known criticisms of behavioral intervention from autistic adults, but also provide more information on the specific ways in which behavioral interventions can be reformed. This information can guide professionals in the development of appropriate goals and decisions around intervention planning. En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-024-06297-3 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=550 [article] The Social Validity of Behavioral Interventions: Seeking Input from Autistic Adults [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Kaitlynn M. P. BAIDEN, Auteur ; Zachary J. WILLIAMS, Auteur ; Rachel K. SCHUCK, Auteur ; Patrick DWYER, Auteur ; Mian WANG, Auteur . - p.1172-1186. Langues : Anglais (eng) in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders > 55-4 (April 2024) . - p.1172-1186 Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Many in the autistic community have expressed concerns regarding the use of behavioral interventions with autistic children, suggesting that these interventions may not be socially valid. Though behavioral interventions have evolved to be more naturalistic and child-centered, little structured research has been done to explicitly seek autistic perspectives on the acceptability of specific components of behavioral interventions. Autistic adults (N = 235) were recruited online to take the Autism Intervention Attitudes Scale (AIAS), a questionnaire designed to gather feedback on common intervention goals and practices. Results indicate that participants find goals and practices that highlight quality of life, safety, and autistic interactions acceptable, while those that focus on normalization based on neurotypical standards are not. An exploratory graph analysis revealed three communities of goals ("uncontroversial goals", "controversial goals", and "social goals"). Comparison between naturalistic and structured intervention components additionally showed that autistic participants favored naturalistic strategies. These findings are in line with known criticisms of behavioral intervention from autistic adults, but also provide more information on the specific ways in which behavioral interventions can be reformed. This information can guide professionals in the development of appropriate goals and decisions around intervention planning. En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-024-06297-3 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=550

---

1 (1 - 3 / 3)