Adapting and validating the Autism Diagnostic Interview - Revised for use with deaf children and young people / Barry WRIGHT in Autism, 26-2 (February 2022)  

Public ISBD [article]  inAutism > 26-2 (February 2022) . - p.446-459 Titre : Adapting and validating the Autism Diagnostic Interview - Revised for use with deaf children and young people Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Barry WRIGHT, Auteur ; Helen PHILLIPS, Auteur ; Victoria ALLGAR, Auteur ; Jennifer SWEETMAN, Auteur ; Rachel HODKINSON, Auteur ; Emily HAYWARD, Auteur ; Amelia RALPH-LEWIS, Auteur ; Catarina TEIGE, Auteur ; Martin BLAND, Auteur ; Ann LE COUTEUR, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.446-459 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Autism Diagnostic Interview–Revised  Autism Diagnostic Interview–Revised Deaf Adaptation  British Sign Language  Delphi consensus methodology  autism spectrum disorder  children  deaf  deaf culture  gesture  language  modified Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Autism assessment processes need to improve for deaf children as they are currently being diagnosed later than their hearing counterparts and misdiagnosis can occur. We took one of the most commonly used parent developmental interviews for autism spectrum disorder the Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised and adapted it using international expert advice. Modifications were proposed and agreed by the expert panel for 45% of items; the remaining 55% of items were unchanged. We then tested the revised version, adapted for deaf children (Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised Deaf Adaptation), in a UK sample of 78 parents/carers of deaf children with autism spectrum disorder and 126 parents/carers with deaf children without autism spectrum disorder. When compared to National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guideline standard clinical assessments, the Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised Deaf Adaptation diagnostic algorithm threshold scores could identify those deaf children with a definite diagnosis (true autism spectrum disorder positives) well (sensitivity of 89% (79%-96%)) and those deaf children who did not have autism spectrum disorder (true autism spectrum disorder negatives) well (specificity of 81% (70%-89%)). Our findings indicate that the Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised Deaf Adaptation is likely to prove a useful measure for the assessment of deaf children with suspected autism spectrum disorder and that further research would be helpful. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/13623613211029116 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=452 [article] Adapting and validating the Autism Diagnostic Interview - Revised for use with deaf children and young people [texte imprimé] / Barry WRIGHT, Auteur ; Helen PHILLIPS, Auteur ; Victoria ALLGAR, Auteur ; Jennifer SWEETMAN, Auteur ; Rachel HODKINSON, Auteur ; Emily HAYWARD, Auteur ; Amelia RALPH-LEWIS, Auteur ; Catarina TEIGE, Auteur ; Martin BLAND, Auteur ; Ann LE COUTEUR, Auteur . - p.446-459. Langues : Anglais (eng) in Autism > 26-2 (February 2022) . - p.446-459 Mots-clés : Autism Diagnostic Interview–Revised  Autism Diagnostic Interview–Revised Deaf Adaptation  British Sign Language  Delphi consensus methodology  autism spectrum disorder  children  deaf  deaf culture  gesture  language  modified Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Autism assessment processes need to improve for deaf children as they are currently being diagnosed later than their hearing counterparts and misdiagnosis can occur. We took one of the most commonly used parent developmental interviews for autism spectrum disorder the Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised and adapted it using international expert advice. Modifications were proposed and agreed by the expert panel for 45% of items; the remaining 55% of items were unchanged. We then tested the revised version, adapted for deaf children (Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised Deaf Adaptation), in a UK sample of 78 parents/carers of deaf children with autism spectrum disorder and 126 parents/carers with deaf children without autism spectrum disorder. When compared to National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guideline standard clinical assessments, the Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised Deaf Adaptation diagnostic algorithm threshold scores could identify those deaf children with a definite diagnosis (true autism spectrum disorder positives) well (sensitivity of 89% (79%-96%)) and those deaf children who did not have autism spectrum disorder (true autism spectrum disorder negatives) well (specificity of 81% (70%-89%)). Our findings indicate that the Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised Deaf Adaptation is likely to prove a useful measure for the assessment of deaf children with suspected autism spectrum disorder and that further research would be helpful. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/13623613211029116 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=452

Adapting and validating the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule Version 2 for use with deaf children and young people / Helen PHILLIPS in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 52-2 (February 2022)  

Public ISBD [article]  inJournal of Autism and Developmental Disorders > 52-2 (February 2022) . - p.553-568 Titre : Adapting and validating the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule Version 2 for use with deaf children and young people Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Helen PHILLIPS, Auteur ; Barry WRIGHT, Auteur ; Victoria ALLGAR, Auteur ; Helen MCCONACHIE, Auteur ; Jennifer SWEETMAN, Auteur ; Rebecca HARGATE, Auteur ; Rachel HODKINSON, Auteur ; Martin BLAND, Auteur ; Hannah GEORGE, Auteur ; Anna HUGHES, Auteur ; Emily HAYWARD, Auteur ; Victoria Fernandez Garcia DE LAS HERAS, Auteur ; Ann LE COUTEUR, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.553-568 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Adolescent  Autism Spectrum Disorder/diagnosis  Autistic Disorder  Child  Humans  Sensitivity and Specificity  Specialization  Assessment  Autism Spectrum Disorder  Autism diagnostic observation schedule  Deaf  Delphi consensus  Diagnosis  Sign language  research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : We report a Delphi Consensus modification and first validation study of the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule - 2 with deaf children and young people (ADOS-2 Deaf adaptation). Validation included 122 deaf participants (aged 2-18 years), 63 with an Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD). This was compared to a National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) guideline standard clinical assessment by blinded independent specialist clinicians. Results showed overall sensitivity 73% (95%CI 60%, 83%); specificity 71% (95%CI 58%, 82%), and for the more common modules 1-3 (combined as in previous studies) sensitivity 79% (95% CI 65-89%); specificity 79% (95% CI 66-89%) suggesting this instrument will be a helpful addition for use with deaf children and young people. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10803-021-04931-y Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=455 [article] Adapting and validating the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule Version 2 for use with deaf children and young people [texte imprimé] / Helen PHILLIPS, Auteur ; Barry WRIGHT, Auteur ; Victoria ALLGAR, Auteur ; Helen MCCONACHIE, Auteur ; Jennifer SWEETMAN, Auteur ; Rebecca HARGATE, Auteur ; Rachel HODKINSON, Auteur ; Martin BLAND, Auteur ; Hannah GEORGE, Auteur ; Anna HUGHES, Auteur ; Emily HAYWARD, Auteur ; Victoria Fernandez Garcia DE LAS HERAS, Auteur ; Ann LE COUTEUR, Auteur . - p.553-568. Langues : Anglais (eng) in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders > 52-2 (February 2022) . - p.553-568 Mots-clés : Adolescent  Autism Spectrum Disorder/diagnosis  Autistic Disorder  Child  Humans  Sensitivity and Specificity  Specialization  Assessment  Autism Spectrum Disorder  Autism diagnostic observation schedule  Deaf  Delphi consensus  Diagnosis  Sign language  research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : We report a Delphi Consensus modification and first validation study of the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule - 2 with deaf children and young people (ADOS-2 Deaf adaptation). Validation included 122 deaf participants (aged 2-18 years), 63 with an Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD). This was compared to a National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) guideline standard clinical assessment by blinded independent specialist clinicians. Results showed overall sensitivity 73% (95%CI 60%, 83%); specificity 71% (95%CI 58%, 82%), and for the more common modules 1-3 (combined as in previous studies) sensitivity 79% (95% CI 65-89%); specificity 79% (95% CI 66-89%) suggesting this instrument will be a helpful addition for use with deaf children and young people. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10803-021-04931-y Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=455

One session treatment (OST) is equivalent to multi-session cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) in children with specific phobias (ASPECT): results from a national non-inferiority randomized controlled trial / Barry WRIGHT in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 64-1 (January 2023)  

Public ISBD [article]  inJournal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 64-1 (January 2023) . - p.39-49 Titre : One session treatment (OST) is equivalent to multi-session cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) in children with specific phobias (ASPECT): results from a national non-inferiority randomized controlled trial Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Barry WRIGHT, Auteur ; Lucy TINDALL, Auteur ; Alexander J. SCOTT, Auteur ; Ellen LEE, Auteur ; Cindy COOPER, Auteur ; Katie BIGGS, Auteur ; Penny BEE, Auteur ; Han-I WANG, Auteur ; Lina GEGA, Auteur ; Emily HAYWARD, Auteur ; Kiera SOLAIMAN, Auteur ; M. Dawn TEARE, Auteur ; Thompson E. III DAVIS, Auteur ; Jon WILSON, Auteur ; Karina LOVELL, Auteur ; Dean MCMILLAN, Auteur ; Amy BARR, Auteur ; Hannah EDWARDS, Auteur ; Joanna E. LOMAS MEVERS, Auteur ; Chris TURTLE, Auteur ; Steve PARROTT, Auteur ; Catarina TEIGE, Auteur ; Tim CHATER, Auteur ; Rebecca HARGATE, Auteur ; Shezhad ALI, Auteur ; Sarah PARKINSON, Auteur ; Simon GILBODY, Auteur ; David MARSHALL, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.39-49 Langues : Anglais (eng) Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Background 5%-10% children and young people (CYP) experience specific phobias that impact daily functioning. Cognitive Behaviour Therapy (CBT) is recommended but has limitations. One Session Treatment (OST), a briefer alternative incorporating CBT principles, has demonstrated efficacy. The Alleviating Specific Phobias Experienced by Children Trial (ASPECT) investigated the non-inferiority of OST compared to multi-session CBT for treating specific phobias in CYP. Methods ASPECT was a pragmatic, multi-center, non-inferiority randomized controlled trial in 26 CAMHS sites, three voluntary agency services, and one university-based CYP well-being service. CYP aged 7-16 years with specific phobia were randomized to receive OST or CBT. Clinical non-inferiority and a nested cost-effectiveness evaluation was assessed 6-months post-randomization using the Behavioural Avoidance Task (BAT). Secondary outcome measures included the Anxiety Disorder Interview Schedule, Child Anxiety Impact Scale, Revised Children's Anxiety Depression Scale, goal-based outcome measure, and EQ-5DY and CHU-9D, collected blind at baseline and six-months. Results 268 CYPs were randomized to OST (n=134) or CBT (n=134). Mean BAT scores at 6 months were similar across groups in both intention-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol (PP) populations (CBT: 7.1 (ITT, n=76), 7.4 (PP, n=57), OST: 7.4 (ITT, n=73), 7.6 (PP, n=56), on the standardized scale-adjusted mean difference for CBT compared to OST -0.123, 95% CI â’0.449 to 0.202 (ITT), mean difference â’0.204, 95% CI â’0.579 to 0.171 (PP)). These findings were wholly below the standardized non-inferiority limit of 0.4, suggesting that OST is non-inferior to CBT. No between-group differences were found on secondary outcomes. OST marginally decreased mean service use costs and maintained similar mean Quality Adjusted Life Years compared to CBT. Conclusions One Session Treatment has similar clinical effectiveness to CBT for specific phobias in CYP and may be a cost-saving alternative. En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.13665 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=490 [article] One session treatment (OST) is equivalent to multi-session cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) in children with specific phobias (ASPECT): results from a national non-inferiority randomized controlled trial [texte imprimé] / Barry WRIGHT, Auteur ; Lucy TINDALL, Auteur ; Alexander J. SCOTT, Auteur ; Ellen LEE, Auteur ; Cindy COOPER, Auteur ; Katie BIGGS, Auteur ; Penny BEE, Auteur ; Han-I WANG, Auteur ; Lina GEGA, Auteur ; Emily HAYWARD, Auteur ; Kiera SOLAIMAN, Auteur ; M. Dawn TEARE, Auteur ; Thompson E. III DAVIS, Auteur ; Jon WILSON, Auteur ; Karina LOVELL, Auteur ; Dean MCMILLAN, Auteur ; Amy BARR, Auteur ; Hannah EDWARDS, Auteur ; Joanna E. LOMAS MEVERS, Auteur ; Chris TURTLE, Auteur ; Steve PARROTT, Auteur ; Catarina TEIGE, Auteur ; Tim CHATER, Auteur ; Rebecca HARGATE, Auteur ; Shezhad ALI, Auteur ; Sarah PARKINSON, Auteur ; Simon GILBODY, Auteur ; David MARSHALL, Auteur . - p.39-49. Langues : Anglais (eng) in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 64-1 (January 2023) . - p.39-49 Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Background 5%-10% children and young people (CYP) experience specific phobias that impact daily functioning. Cognitive Behaviour Therapy (CBT) is recommended but has limitations. One Session Treatment (OST), a briefer alternative incorporating CBT principles, has demonstrated efficacy. The Alleviating Specific Phobias Experienced by Children Trial (ASPECT) investigated the non-inferiority of OST compared to multi-session CBT for treating specific phobias in CYP. Methods ASPECT was a pragmatic, multi-center, non-inferiority randomized controlled trial in 26 CAMHS sites, three voluntary agency services, and one university-based CYP well-being service. CYP aged 7-16 years with specific phobia were randomized to receive OST or CBT. Clinical non-inferiority and a nested cost-effectiveness evaluation was assessed 6-months post-randomization using the Behavioural Avoidance Task (BAT). Secondary outcome measures included the Anxiety Disorder Interview Schedule, Child Anxiety Impact Scale, Revised Children's Anxiety Depression Scale, goal-based outcome measure, and EQ-5DY and CHU-9D, collected blind at baseline and six-months. Results 268 CYPs were randomized to OST (n=134) or CBT (n=134). Mean BAT scores at 6 months were similar across groups in both intention-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol (PP) populations (CBT: 7.1 (ITT, n=76), 7.4 (PP, n=57), OST: 7.4 (ITT, n=73), 7.6 (PP, n=56), on the standardized scale-adjusted mean difference for CBT compared to OST -0.123, 95% CI â’0.449 to 0.202 (ITT), mean difference â’0.204, 95% CI â’0.579 to 0.171 (PP)). These findings were wholly below the standardized non-inferiority limit of 0.4, suggesting that OST is non-inferior to CBT. No between-group differences were found on secondary outcomes. OST marginally decreased mean service use costs and maintained similar mean Quality Adjusted Life Years compared to CBT. Conclusions One Session Treatment has similar clinical effectiveness to CBT for specific phobias in CYP and may be a cost-saving alternative. En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.13665 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=490

---

1 (1 - 3 / 3) Par page : 25 50 100 200