Centre d'Information et de documentation du CRA Rhône-Alpes
CRA
Informations pratiques
-
Adresse
Centre d'information et de documentation
du CRA Rhône-Alpes
Centre Hospitalier le Vinatier
bât 211
95, Bd Pinel
69678 Bron CedexHoraires
Lundi au Vendredi
9h00-12h00 13h30-16h00Contact
Tél: +33(0)4 37 91 54 65
Mail
Fax: +33(0)4 37 91 54 37
-
Détail de l'auteur
Auteur Timothy LAVIGNE |
Documents disponibles écrits par cet auteur (1)
Faire une suggestion Affiner la recherche
Explicit vs. applied theory of mind competence: A comparison of typically developing males, males with ASD, and males with ADHD / Tiffany L. HUTCHINS in Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 21 (January 2016)
[article]
Titre : Explicit vs. applied theory of mind competence: A comparison of typically developing males, males with ASD, and males with ADHD Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Tiffany L. HUTCHINS, Auteur ; Patricia A. PRELOCK, Auteur ; Hope MORRIS, Auteur ; Joy BENNER, Auteur ; Timothy LAVIGNE, Auteur ; Betsy HOZA, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.94-108 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Autism spectrum disorder Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder Theory of mind Assessment Children Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Using laboratory-type Theory of Mind (ToM) tasks (our measure of ‘explicit’ ToM competence) and a more ecologically-valid measure of ToM (our measure of ‘applied’ ToM competence), we found that for composite scores, typically developing (TD) males performed near ceiling levels on both indices and age-matched males with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) performed near floor levels on both indices. The scores for age-matched males with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) showed a different pattern such that the ADHD group had high scores on the explicit measure and low scores on the applied measure. Subscale scores (early, basic, advanced ToM) for the two indices also revealed that (1) despite variable complexity, explicit ToM almost always distinguished the ASD group from the other two groups but never distinguished the ADHD and TD groups and (2) level of complexity was critical for distinguishing groups with regard to applied ToM. We suggest that although children with ADHD can calculate the content of traditional laboratory ToM tasks, this explicit ToM competence fails to be applied and expressed in real world demonstrations of ToM (especially when advanced ToM skills are assessed). By contrast, the ToM difficulties of children with ASD seem to be attributable to a deeper metarepresentational deficit. Our results have implications for practice and extend current models of social cognition in developmental disabilities by isolating variable aspects of competence that predict specific and testable models for future research. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2015.10.004 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=274
in Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders > 21 (January 2016) . - p.94-108[article] Explicit vs. applied theory of mind competence: A comparison of typically developing males, males with ASD, and males with ADHD [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Tiffany L. HUTCHINS, Auteur ; Patricia A. PRELOCK, Auteur ; Hope MORRIS, Auteur ; Joy BENNER, Auteur ; Timothy LAVIGNE, Auteur ; Betsy HOZA, Auteur . - p.94-108.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders > 21 (January 2016) . - p.94-108
Mots-clés : Autism spectrum disorder Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder Theory of mind Assessment Children Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Using laboratory-type Theory of Mind (ToM) tasks (our measure of ‘explicit’ ToM competence) and a more ecologically-valid measure of ToM (our measure of ‘applied’ ToM competence), we found that for composite scores, typically developing (TD) males performed near ceiling levels on both indices and age-matched males with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) performed near floor levels on both indices. The scores for age-matched males with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) showed a different pattern such that the ADHD group had high scores on the explicit measure and low scores on the applied measure. Subscale scores (early, basic, advanced ToM) for the two indices also revealed that (1) despite variable complexity, explicit ToM almost always distinguished the ASD group from the other two groups but never distinguished the ADHD and TD groups and (2) level of complexity was critical for distinguishing groups with regard to applied ToM. We suggest that although children with ADHD can calculate the content of traditional laboratory ToM tasks, this explicit ToM competence fails to be applied and expressed in real world demonstrations of ToM (especially when advanced ToM skills are assessed). By contrast, the ToM difficulties of children with ASD seem to be attributable to a deeper metarepresentational deficit. Our results have implications for practice and extend current models of social cognition in developmental disabilities by isolating variable aspects of competence that predict specific and testable models for future research. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2015.10.004 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=274