Centre d'Information et de documentation du CRA Rhône-Alpes
CRA
Informations pratiques
-
Adresse
Centre d'information et de documentation
du CRA Rhône-Alpes
Centre Hospitalier le Vinatier
bât 211
95, Bd Pinel
69678 Bron CedexHoraires
Lundi au Vendredi
9h00-12h00 13h30-16h00Contact
Tél: +33(0)4 37 91 54 65
Mail
Fax: +33(0)4 37 91 54 37
-
Détail de l'auteur
Auteur Sarah CRAWFORD |
Documents disponibles écrits par cet auteur (1)
Faire une suggestion Affiner la recherche
Using and reasoning about social strategies in autism spectrum disorder in everyday situations / Giulia BELLESI in Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 25 (May 2016)
[article]
Titre : Using and reasoning about social strategies in autism spectrum disorder in everyday situations Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Giulia BELLESI, Auteur ; Leila JAMEEL, Auteur ; Karishma VYAS, Auteur ; Sarah CRAWFORD, Auteur ; Shelley CHANNON, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.112-121 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Autism spectrum disorder Social skill Empathy Mentalising Social knowledge Social cognition Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Although a substantial amount of previous work has been dedicated to the study of the possible theoretical mechanisms underpinning autism spectrum disorder (ASD), little research has examined the types of difficulties experienced by individuals in their everyday social functioning. University students with ASD and matched control participants performed the Social Strategy task. In this, they read a range of descriptions of social interactions, all ending with an awkward question asked by the story main character. The types of strategies they used to answer the awkward questions were examined. Compared to control participants, those with ASD used a more negative emotional tone in responding, generated more simple strategies including acquiescence or refusal, and fewer sophisticated strategies that considered all parties’ perspectives. In a novel task condition, participants rank-ordered simple and sophisticated strategies, and gave justifications for their use. Rank-ordering did not differentiate the groups. Justifications given by those with ASD for simple strategies were more practical and less often character-based than those given by control participants; the groups did not differ in the justifications given for sophisticated strategies. The possible explanations of these findings and implications for informing current intervention programmes are considered. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2016.02.004 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=285
in Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders > 25 (May 2016) . - p.112-121[article] Using and reasoning about social strategies in autism spectrum disorder in everyday situations [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Giulia BELLESI, Auteur ; Leila JAMEEL, Auteur ; Karishma VYAS, Auteur ; Sarah CRAWFORD, Auteur ; Shelley CHANNON, Auteur . - p.112-121.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders > 25 (May 2016) . - p.112-121
Mots-clés : Autism spectrum disorder Social skill Empathy Mentalising Social knowledge Social cognition Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Although a substantial amount of previous work has been dedicated to the study of the possible theoretical mechanisms underpinning autism spectrum disorder (ASD), little research has examined the types of difficulties experienced by individuals in their everyday social functioning. University students with ASD and matched control participants performed the Social Strategy task. In this, they read a range of descriptions of social interactions, all ending with an awkward question asked by the story main character. The types of strategies they used to answer the awkward questions were examined. Compared to control participants, those with ASD used a more negative emotional tone in responding, generated more simple strategies including acquiescence or refusal, and fewer sophisticated strategies that considered all parties’ perspectives. In a novel task condition, participants rank-ordered simple and sophisticated strategies, and gave justifications for their use. Rank-ordering did not differentiate the groups. Justifications given by those with ASD for simple strategies were more practical and less often character-based than those given by control participants; the groups did not differ in the justifications given for sophisticated strategies. The possible explanations of these findings and implications for informing current intervention programmes are considered. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2016.02.004 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=285