Best practices for teaching joint attention: A systematic review of the intervention literature / Pamela J. WHITE in Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 5-4 (October-December 2011)  

Public ISBD [article]  inResearch in Autism Spectrum Disorders > 5-4 (October-December 2011) . - p.1283-1295 Titre : Best practices for teaching joint attention: A systematic review of the intervention literature Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Pamela J. WHITE, Auteur ; Mark O'REILLY, Auteur ; William STREUSAND, Auteur ; Ann LEVINE, Auteur ; Jeff SIGAFOOS, Auteur ; Giulio E. LANCIONI, Auteur ; Christina FRAGALE, Auteur ; Nigel PIERCE, Auteur ; Jeannie M. AGUILAR, Auteur Année de publication : 2011 Article en page(s) : p.1283-1295 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Autism  Intervention  Joint attention  Systematic review Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Joint attention is the act of sharing an experience of an object or event with another person. Individuals with autism often have deficits in this area. This review synthesizes 27 articles, involving interventions for individuals with autism, that measured joint attention as an outcome variable. Studies were analyzed and summarized in terms of: (a) joint attention as a collateral versus direct outcome, (b) participant characteristics, (c) study design, (d) intervention techniques, (e) types of joint attention measured, and (f) results. Interventions either directly targeted joint attention or measured joint attention as a collateral outcome. Most interventions used a combination of behavioral and developmental strategies. The results of these studies suggest that using play as a context, and training with natural communication partners may benefit generalization. Future research should address the relation between type of intervention and child characteristics, ensure that joint attention behaviors meet natural contingencies that serve the purpose of sharing attention, and continue to examine collateral outcomes of joint attention. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2011.02.003 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=125 [article] Best practices for teaching joint attention: A systematic review of the intervention literature [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Pamela J. WHITE, Auteur ; Mark O'REILLY, Auteur ; William STREUSAND, Auteur ; Ann LEVINE, Auteur ; Jeff SIGAFOOS, Auteur ; Giulio E. LANCIONI, Auteur ; Christina FRAGALE, Auteur ; Nigel PIERCE, Auteur ; Jeannie M. AGUILAR, Auteur . - 2011 . - p.1283-1295. Langues : Anglais (eng) in Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders > 5-4 (October-December 2011) . - p.1283-1295 Mots-clés : Autism  Intervention  Joint attention  Systematic review Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Joint attention is the act of sharing an experience of an object or event with another person. Individuals with autism often have deficits in this area. This review synthesizes 27 articles, involving interventions for individuals with autism, that measured joint attention as an outcome variable. Studies were analyzed and summarized in terms of: (a) joint attention as a collateral versus direct outcome, (b) participant characteristics, (c) study design, (d) intervention techniques, (e) types of joint attention measured, and (f) results. Interventions either directly targeted joint attention or measured joint attention as a collateral outcome. Most interventions used a combination of behavioral and developmental strategies. The results of these studies suggest that using play as a context, and training with natural communication partners may benefit generalization. Future research should address the relation between type of intervention and child characteristics, ensure that joint attention behaviors meet natural contingencies that serve the purpose of sharing attention, and continue to examine collateral outcomes of joint attention. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2011.02.003 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=125

Sensory integration therapy for autism spectrum disorders: A systematic review / Russell B. LANG in Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 6-3 (July-September 2012)  

Public ISBD [article]  inResearch in Autism Spectrum Disorders > 6-3 (July-September 2012) . - p.1004-1018 Titre : Sensory integration therapy for autism spectrum disorders: A systematic review Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Russell B. LANG, Auteur ; Mark O'REILLY, Auteur ; Olive HEALY, Auteur ; Mandy RISPOLI, Auteur ; Helena LYDON, Auteur ; William STREUSAND, Auteur ; Tonya N. DAVIS, Auteur ; Soyeon KANG, Auteur ; Jeff SIGAFOOS, Auteur ; Giulio E. LANCIONI, Auteur ; Robert DIDDEN, Auteur ; Sanne GIESBERS, Auteur Année de publication : 2012 Article en page(s) : p.1004-1018 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Sensory integration  Autism  Weighted vests  Proprioceptive  Vestibular  Sensory diet Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Intervention studies involving the use of sensory integration therapy (SIT) were systematically identified and analyzed. Twenty-five studies were described in terms of: (a) participant characteristics, (b) assessments used to identify sensory deficits or behavioral functions, (c) dependent variables, (d) intervention procedures, (e) intervention outcomes, and (f) certainty of evidence. Overall, 3 of the reviewed studies suggested that SIT was effective, 8 studies found mixed results, and 14 studies reported no benefits related to SIT. Many of the reviewed studies, including the 3 studies reporting positive results, had serious methodological flaws. Therefore, the current evidence-base does not support the use of SIT in the education and treatment of children with autism spectrum disorders (ASD). Practitioners and agencies serving children with ASD that endeavor, or are mandated, to use research-based, or scientifically-based, interventions should not use SIT outside of carefully controlled research. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2012.01.006 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=153 [article] Sensory integration therapy for autism spectrum disorders: A systematic review [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Russell B. LANG, Auteur ; Mark O'REILLY, Auteur ; Olive HEALY, Auteur ; Mandy RISPOLI, Auteur ; Helena LYDON, Auteur ; William STREUSAND, Auteur ; Tonya N. DAVIS, Auteur ; Soyeon KANG, Auteur ; Jeff SIGAFOOS, Auteur ; Giulio E. LANCIONI, Auteur ; Robert DIDDEN, Auteur ; Sanne GIESBERS, Auteur . - 2012 . - p.1004-1018. Langues : Anglais (eng) in Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders > 6-3 (July-September 2012) . - p.1004-1018 Mots-clés : Sensory integration  Autism  Weighted vests  Proprioceptive  Vestibular  Sensory diet Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Intervention studies involving the use of sensory integration therapy (SIT) were systematically identified and analyzed. Twenty-five studies were described in terms of: (a) participant characteristics, (b) assessments used to identify sensory deficits or behavioral functions, (c) dependent variables, (d) intervention procedures, (e) intervention outcomes, and (f) certainty of evidence. Overall, 3 of the reviewed studies suggested that SIT was effective, 8 studies found mixed results, and 14 studies reported no benefits related to SIT. Many of the reviewed studies, including the 3 studies reporting positive results, had serious methodological flaws. Therefore, the current evidence-base does not support the use of SIT in the education and treatment of children with autism spectrum disorders (ASD). Practitioners and agencies serving children with ASD that endeavor, or are mandated, to use research-based, or scientifically-based, interventions should not use SIT outside of carefully controlled research. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2012.01.006 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=153

---

1 (1 - 2 / 2)