Accuracy of initial diagnostic impressions of autism in toddlers and behaviors that inform these impressions / Rebecca P. THOMAS in Autism Research, 17-3 (March 2024)  

Public ISBD [article]  inAutism Research > 17-3 (March 2024) . - p.568-583 Titre : Accuracy of initial diagnostic impressions of autism in toddlers and behaviors that inform these impressions Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Rebecca P. THOMAS, Auteur ; Ashley DE MARCHENA, Auteur ; Andrea Trubanova WIECKOWSKI, Auteur ; Aubyn STAHMER, Auteur ; Stephanie MILAN, Auteur ; Jeffrey D. BURKE, Auteur ; Marianne L. BARTON, Auteur ; Diana L. ROBINS, Auteur ; Deborah A. FEIN, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.568-583 Langues : Anglais (eng) Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Abstract Clinicians form initial impressions about a child's diagnosis based on behavioral features, but research has not yet identified specific behaviors to guide initial diagnostic impressions. Participants were toddlers (N = 55, mean age 22.9?months) from a multi-site early detection study, referred for concern for ASD due to screening or parent/provider concern. Within 5?min of meeting a child, clinicians noted ASD or non-ASD impression, confidence in impression, and behaviors that informed their impression. These clinicians also determined final diagnoses for each child. When a child's final diagnosis was ASD (n = 35), senior clinicians formed an initial impression of ASD in 22 cases (63%) but missed 13 cases (37%). When final diagnosis was non-ASD (n = 20), senior clinicians made an initial impression of non-ASD in all cases (100%). Results were similar among junior clinicians. Senior and junior clinicians used the same behaviors to form accurate impressions of ASD and non-ASD: social reciprocity, nonverbal communication, and eye contact. Senior clinicians additionally used focus of attention when forming accurate impressions of ASD and non-ASD; junior clinicians used this behavior only when forming accurate non-ASD impressions. Clinicians' initial impressions of ASD are very likely to be consistent with final diagnoses, but initial impressions of non-ASD need follow-up. Toddlers who show all four atypical behaviors (social reciprocity, nonverbal communication, eye contact, and focus of attention) might receive expedited ASD diagnoses. However, presence of apparently typical behaviors should not rule out ASD; for some children a longer evaluation is necessary to allow for more opportunities to observe subtle social behavior. En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1002/aur.3088 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=525 [article] Accuracy of initial diagnostic impressions of autism in toddlers and behaviors that inform these impressions [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Rebecca P. THOMAS, Auteur ; Ashley DE MARCHENA, Auteur ; Andrea Trubanova WIECKOWSKI, Auteur ; Aubyn STAHMER, Auteur ; Stephanie MILAN, Auteur ; Jeffrey D. BURKE, Auteur ; Marianne L. BARTON, Auteur ; Diana L. ROBINS, Auteur ; Deborah A. FEIN, Auteur . - p.568-583. Langues : Anglais (eng) in Autism Research > 17-3 (March 2024) . - p.568-583 Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Abstract Clinicians form initial impressions about a child's diagnosis based on behavioral features, but research has not yet identified specific behaviors to guide initial diagnostic impressions. Participants were toddlers (N = 55, mean age 22.9?months) from a multi-site early detection study, referred for concern for ASD due to screening or parent/provider concern. Within 5?min of meeting a child, clinicians noted ASD or non-ASD impression, confidence in impression, and behaviors that informed their impression. These clinicians also determined final diagnoses for each child. When a child's final diagnosis was ASD (n = 35), senior clinicians formed an initial impression of ASD in 22 cases (63%) but missed 13 cases (37%). When final diagnosis was non-ASD (n = 20), senior clinicians made an initial impression of non-ASD in all cases (100%). Results were similar among junior clinicians. Senior and junior clinicians used the same behaviors to form accurate impressions of ASD and non-ASD: social reciprocity, nonverbal communication, and eye contact. Senior clinicians additionally used focus of attention when forming accurate impressions of ASD and non-ASD; junior clinicians used this behavior only when forming accurate non-ASD impressions. Clinicians' initial impressions of ASD are very likely to be consistent with final diagnoses, but initial impressions of non-ASD need follow-up. Toddlers who show all four atypical behaviors (social reciprocity, nonverbal communication, eye contact, and focus of attention) might receive expedited ASD diagnoses. However, presence of apparently typical behaviors should not rule out ASD; for some children a longer evaluation is necessary to allow for more opportunities to observe subtle social behavior. En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1002/aur.3088 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=525

Adolescent Conduct Disorder and Interpersonal Callousness as Predictors of Psychopathy in Young Adults / Jeffrey D. BURKE in Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 36-3 (July-September 2007)  

Public ISBD [article]  inJournal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology > 36-3 (July-September 2007) . - p.334-346 Titre : Adolescent Conduct Disorder and Interpersonal Callousness as Predictors of Psychopathy in Young Adults Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Jeffrey D. BURKE, Auteur ; Benjamin B. LAHEY, Auteur ; Rolf LOEBER, Auteur Année de publication : 2007 Article en page(s) : p.334-346 Langues : Anglais (eng) Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Unfortunately, very little research has examined the link between antisocial personality traits in childhood and adult psychopathy. This study used data from a clinic-referred sample of 177 boys, assessed annually from recruitment (ages 7 to 12) through age 19. Parent and teacher ratings of interpersonal callousness (IC) were tested at predictors of psychopathy ratings at 18 and 19. In regression models, conduct disorder (CD) and teacher-rated IC both predicted both Factor 1 (interpersonal and affective items) and Factor 2 (impulsivity and antisocial behavior items) of the Psychopathy Checklist—Revised, as did child IQ. Prenatal tobacco exposure and cortisol measured in adolescence predicted only Factor 1. When each factor was included in the prediction of the other, CD and IC no longer predicted Factor 1 but remained significant predictors of Factor 2. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15374410701444223 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=159 [article] Adolescent Conduct Disorder and Interpersonal Callousness as Predictors of Psychopathy in Young Adults [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Jeffrey D. BURKE, Auteur ; Benjamin B. LAHEY, Auteur ; Rolf LOEBER, Auteur . - 2007 . - p.334-346. Langues : Anglais (eng) in Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology > 36-3 (July-September 2007) . - p.334-346 Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Unfortunately, very little research has examined the link between antisocial personality traits in childhood and adult psychopathy. This study used data from a clinic-referred sample of 177 boys, assessed annually from recruitment (ages 7 to 12) through age 19. Parent and teacher ratings of interpersonal callousness (IC) were tested at predictors of psychopathy ratings at 18 and 19. In regression models, conduct disorder (CD) and teacher-rated IC both predicted both Factor 1 (interpersonal and affective items) and Factor 2 (impulsivity and antisocial behavior items) of the Psychopathy Checklist—Revised, as did child IQ. Prenatal tobacco exposure and cortisol measured in adolescence predicted only Factor 1. When each factor was included in the prediction of the other, CD and IC no longer predicted Factor 1 but remained significant predictors of Factor 2. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15374410701444223 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=159

An affective dimension within oppositional defiant disorder symptoms among boys: personality and psychopathology outcomes into early adulthood / Jeffrey D. BURKE in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 53-11 (November 2012)  

Public ISBD [article]  inJournal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 53-11 (November 2012) . - p.1176-1183 Titre : An affective dimension within oppositional defiant disorder symptoms among boys: personality and psychopathology outcomes into early adulthood Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Jeffrey D. BURKE, Auteur Année de publication : 2012 Article en page(s) : p.1176-1183 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Oppositional defiant disorder  irritability  depression  anxiety  neuroticism  Trouble oppositionnel avec provocation Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Background:  A dimension of negatively oriented affect within oppositional defiant disorder (ODD) symptoms, which has been described as irritability, has been shown to predict depression and anxiety. Related constructs have been linked to temperament and personality constructs. However, only a few studies have examined the prediction from irritability within ODD to psychopathology or personality outcomes. Further, no studies have investigated whether irritability distinguishes among classes of youth. Methods:  Data from a clinic-referred sample of 7–12-year-old boys followed up to age 18 were used. Measures included structured clinical interviews with parents through adolescence, and youth self-report of depression and personality domains at age 18. Results:  Variable-oriented analyses found predictive links between irritability and outcomes of depression, anxiety, and Neuroticism. Latent classes of youth were distinguished by the presence or absence of irritability symptoms. Youth classified by irritability symptoms at baseline were significantly more likely to show anxiety and depression through adolescence and depression and Neuroticism at 18. No relationship was observed for the other of the Big Five personality factors. Conclusion:  Irritability symptoms within ODD distinguish youth at risk for persisting problems with internalizing disorders and Neuroticism into adulthood. The findings are suggestive of a model in which the early emergence of irritability marks life-course risks for specific types of psychopathology and personality problems. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2012.02598.x Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=182 [article] An affective dimension within oppositional defiant disorder symptoms among boys: personality and psychopathology outcomes into early adulthood [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Jeffrey D. BURKE, Auteur . - 2012 . - p.1176-1183. Langues : Anglais (eng) in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 53-11 (November 2012) . - p.1176-1183 Mots-clés : Oppositional defiant disorder  irritability  depression  anxiety  neuroticism  Trouble oppositionnel avec provocation Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Background:  A dimension of negatively oriented affect within oppositional defiant disorder (ODD) symptoms, which has been described as irritability, has been shown to predict depression and anxiety. Related constructs have been linked to temperament and personality constructs. However, only a few studies have examined the prediction from irritability within ODD to psychopathology or personality outcomes. Further, no studies have investigated whether irritability distinguishes among classes of youth. Methods:  Data from a clinic-referred sample of 7–12-year-old boys followed up to age 18 were used. Measures included structured clinical interviews with parents through adolescence, and youth self-report of depression and personality domains at age 18. Results:  Variable-oriented analyses found predictive links between irritability and outcomes of depression, anxiety, and Neuroticism. Latent classes of youth were distinguished by the presence or absence of irritability symptoms. Youth classified by irritability symptoms at baseline were significantly more likely to show anxiety and depression through adolescence and depression and Neuroticism at 18. No relationship was observed for the other of the Big Five personality factors. Conclusion:  Irritability symptoms within ODD distinguish youth at risk for persisting problems with internalizing disorders and Neuroticism into adulthood. The findings are suggestive of a model in which the early emergence of irritability marks life-course risks for specific types of psychopathology and personality problems. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2012.02598.x Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=182

Commentary: Optimism for the future of research on disruptive behaviors - an appreciation of good science as illustrated by Nobakht, Steinsbekk & Wichstrom (2023) / Jeffrey D. BURKE in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 65-11 (November 2024)  

Public ISBD [article]  inJournal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 65-11 (November 2024) . - p.1543-1545 Titre : Commentary: Optimism for the future of research on disruptive behaviors - an appreciation of good science as illustrated by Nobakht, Steinsbekk & Wichstrom (2023) Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Jeffrey D. BURKE, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.1543-1545 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Oppositional defiant disorder  conduct disorder  parenting Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : This paper by Nobakht, Steinsbekk & Wichstrom (2023) is a model of good science in the study of oppositional defiant disorder and conduct disorder. Their approach illustrates a thoughtful research design, statistical modeling sufficient to empirically evaluate developmental processes, and a full consideration of the theoretical implications of their work. This contrasts with a broad history of research on ODD and CD that far too often has only reified biased assumptions about these phenomena rather than rigorously scrutinizing them. Their demonstration of a unidirectional developmental flow of influence from ODD to interparental aggression, and thence to CD highlights a set of complicated developmental processes involving these disorders and their environment. It expands on evidence of the toll that ODD exerts on parents and provides guidance for more specific intervention. Standards in developmental psychopathology research should include testing bidirectional processes and employing designs that could falsify rather than reify existing beliefs. Examining key mechanisms in such processes will more rapidly generate improvements in assessment and treatment. En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.14041 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=537 [article] Commentary: Optimism for the future of research on disruptive behaviors - an appreciation of good science as illustrated by Nobakht, Steinsbekk & Wichstrom (2023) [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Jeffrey D. BURKE, Auteur . - p.1543-1545. Langues : Anglais (eng) in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 65-11 (November 2024) . - p.1543-1545 Mots-clés : Oppositional defiant disorder  conduct disorder  parenting Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : This paper by Nobakht, Steinsbekk & Wichstrom (2023) is a model of good science in the study of oppositional defiant disorder and conduct disorder. Their approach illustrates a thoughtful research design, statistical modeling sufficient to empirically evaluate developmental processes, and a full consideration of the theoretical implications of their work. This contrasts with a broad history of research on ODD and CD that far too often has only reified biased assumptions about these phenomena rather than rigorously scrutinizing them. Their demonstration of a unidirectional developmental flow of influence from ODD to interparental aggression, and thence to CD highlights a set of complicated developmental processes involving these disorders and their environment. It expands on evidence of the toll that ODD exerts on parents and provides guidance for more specific intervention. Standards in developmental psychopathology research should include testing bidirectional processes and employing designs that could falsify rather than reify existing beliefs. Examining key mechanisms in such processes will more rapidly generate improvements in assessment and treatment. En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.14041 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=537

Diagnostic classification of irritability and oppositionality in youth: a global field study comparing ICD-11 with ICD-10 and DSM-5 / Spencer C. EVANS in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 62-3 (March 2021)  

Public ISBD [article]  inJournal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 62-3 (March 2021) . - p.303-312 Titre : Diagnostic classification of irritability and oppositionality in youth: a global field study comparing ICD-11 with ICD-10 and DSM-5 Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Spencer C. EVANS, Auteur ; Michael C. ROBERTS, Auteur ; Jared W. KEELEY, Auteur ; Tahilia J. REBELLO, Auteur ; Francisco DE LA PEÑA, Auteur ; John E. LOCHMAN, Auteur ; Jeffrey D. BURKE, Auteur ; Paula J. FITE, Auteur ; Lourdes EZPELETA, Auteur ; Walter MATTHYS, Auteur ; Eric A. YOUNGSTROM, Auteur ; Chihiro MATSUMOTO, Auteur ; Howard F. ANDREWS, Auteur ; María ELENA MEDINA-MORA, Auteur ; José L. AYUSO-MATEOS, Auteur ; Brigitte KHOURY, Auteur ; Mayya KULYGINA, Auteur ; Rebeca ROBLES, Auteur ; Pratap SHARAN, Auteur ; Min ZHAO, Auteur ; Geoffrey M. REED, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.303-312 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11)  child and adolescent mental health  irritability  mood dysregulation  oppositional defiant disorder Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : BACKGROUND: Severe irritability has become an important topic in child and adolescent mental health. Based on the available evidence and on public health considerations, WHO classified chronic irritability within oppositional defiant disorder (ODD) in ICD-11, a solution markedly different from DSM-5's (i.e. the new childhood mood diagnosis, disruptive mood dysregulation disorder [DMDD]) and from ICD-10's (i.e. ODD as one of several conduct disorders without attention to irritability). In this study, we tested the accuracy with which a global, multilingual, multidisciplinary sample of clinicians were able to use the ICD-11 classification of chronic irritability and oppositionality as compared to the ICD-10 and DSM-5 approaches. METHODS: Clinicians (N = 196) from 48 countries participated in an Internet-based field study in English, Spanish, or Japanese and were randomized to review and use one of the three diagnostic systems. Through experimental manipulation of validated clinical vignettes, we evaluated how well clinicians in each condition could identify chronic irritability versus nonirritable oppositionality, episodic bipolar disorder, dysthymic depression, and normative irritability. RESULTS: Compared to ICD-10 and DSM-5, ICD-11 led to more accurate identification of severe irritability and better differentiation from boundary presentations. Participants using DSM-5 largely failed to apply the DMDD diagnosis when it was appropriate, and they more often applied psychopathological diagnoses to developmentally normative irritability. CONCLUSIONS: The formulation of irritability and oppositionality put forth in ICD-11 shows evidence of clinical utility, supporting accurate diagnosis. Global mental health clinicians can readily identify ODD both with and without chronic irritability. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.13244 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=443 [article] Diagnostic classification of irritability and oppositionality in youth: a global field study comparing ICD-11 with ICD-10 and DSM-5 [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Spencer C. EVANS, Auteur ; Michael C. ROBERTS, Auteur ; Jared W. KEELEY, Auteur ; Tahilia J. REBELLO, Auteur ; Francisco DE LA PEÑA, Auteur ; John E. LOCHMAN, Auteur ; Jeffrey D. BURKE, Auteur ; Paula J. FITE, Auteur ; Lourdes EZPELETA, Auteur ; Walter MATTHYS, Auteur ; Eric A. YOUNGSTROM, Auteur ; Chihiro MATSUMOTO, Auteur ; Howard F. ANDREWS, Auteur ; María ELENA MEDINA-MORA, Auteur ; José L. AYUSO-MATEOS, Auteur ; Brigitte KHOURY, Auteur ; Mayya KULYGINA, Auteur ; Rebeca ROBLES, Auteur ; Pratap SHARAN, Auteur ; Min ZHAO, Auteur ; Geoffrey M. REED, Auteur . - p.303-312. Langues : Anglais (eng) in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 62-3 (March 2021) . - p.303-312 Mots-clés : International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11)  child and adolescent mental health  irritability  mood dysregulation  oppositional defiant disorder Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : BACKGROUND: Severe irritability has become an important topic in child and adolescent mental health. Based on the available evidence and on public health considerations, WHO classified chronic irritability within oppositional defiant disorder (ODD) in ICD-11, a solution markedly different from DSM-5's (i.e. the new childhood mood diagnosis, disruptive mood dysregulation disorder [DMDD]) and from ICD-10's (i.e. ODD as one of several conduct disorders without attention to irritability). In this study, we tested the accuracy with which a global, multilingual, multidisciplinary sample of clinicians were able to use the ICD-11 classification of chronic irritability and oppositionality as compared to the ICD-10 and DSM-5 approaches. METHODS: Clinicians (N = 196) from 48 countries participated in an Internet-based field study in English, Spanish, or Japanese and were randomized to review and use one of the three diagnostic systems. Through experimental manipulation of validated clinical vignettes, we evaluated how well clinicians in each condition could identify chronic irritability versus nonirritable oppositionality, episodic bipolar disorder, dysthymic depression, and normative irritability. RESULTS: Compared to ICD-10 and DSM-5, ICD-11 led to more accurate identification of severe irritability and better differentiation from boundary presentations. Participants using DSM-5 largely failed to apply the DMDD diagnosis when it was appropriate, and they more often applied psychopathological diagnoses to developmentally normative irritability. CONCLUSIONS: The formulation of irritability and oppositionality put forth in ICD-11 shows evidence of clinical utility, supporting accurate diagnosis. Global mental health clinicians can readily identify ODD both with and without chronic irritability. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.13244 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=443

Functional outcomes of child and adolescent oppositional defiant disorder symptoms in young adult men / Jeffrey D. BURKE in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 55-3 (March 2014)  

Permalink

Impact of oppositional defiant disorder dimensions on the temporal ordering of conduct problems and depression across childhood and adolescence in girls / Alison E. HIPWELL in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 52-10 (October 2011)  

Permalink

Language abilities in monolingual- and bilingual- exposed children with autism or other developmental disorders / Yael G. DAI in Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 55 (November 2018)  

Permalink

Perspectives on oppositional defiant disorder, conduct disorder, and psychopathic features / Rolf LOEBER in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 50-1-2 (January/February 2009)  

Permalink

Pragmatic language and associations with externalizing behaviors in autistic individuals and those who have lost the autism diagnosis / Jason CRUTCHER in Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 108 (October 2023)  

Permalink

---

1 (1 - 10 / 10)