Cognitive emotion regulation, anxiety and depression in adults with autism spectrum disorder / A. BRUGGINK in Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 22 (February 2016)  

Public ISBD [article]  inResearch in Autism Spectrum Disorders > 22 (February 2016) . - p.34-44 Titre : Cognitive emotion regulation, anxiety and depression in adults with autism spectrum disorder Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : A. BRUGGINK, Auteur ; S. HUISMAN, Auteur ; R. VUIJK, Auteur ; V. KRAAIJ, Auteur ; N. GARNEFSKI, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.34-44 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Autism  ASD  Cognitive emotion regulation  Comorbidity  Anxiety  Depression Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : AbstractGoal To investigate the relationship between cognitive emotion regulation and anxiety and depression in adults with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Methods One hundred and twenty-one adults with ASD were compared to neurotypical adults, matched on age and gender. Cognitive emotion regulation was measured with the Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (CERQ). Anxiety and depression were measured using the Symptom Check List (SCL-90). Results The ASD group reported more use of the strategy “Other-blame” and less use of “Positive reappraisal” than the control group. A significant relationship was found between cognitive emotion regulation strategies and anxiety and depression in the ASD group. There were no differences found in the strength of the relationship between cognitive emotion regulation and anxiety and depression, except for the relationship between “Catastrophizing” and depression, which was more strongly related in neurotypical adults. Conclusion Adults with ASD do not use less cognitive emotion regulation strategies, but use more “Other-blame” and less “Positive reappraisal”. There was no difference between the ASD group and the neurotypical group regarding the strength of the relationship between the cognitive emotion regulation strategies and anxiety and depression. These results encourage the use of cognitive therapy for depression and anxiety in people with ASD. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2015.11.003 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=278 [article] Cognitive emotion regulation, anxiety and depression in adults with autism spectrum disorder [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / A. BRUGGINK, Auteur ; S. HUISMAN, Auteur ; R. VUIJK, Auteur ; V. KRAAIJ, Auteur ; N. GARNEFSKI, Auteur . - p.34-44. Langues : Anglais (eng) in Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders > 22 (February 2016) . - p.34-44 Mots-clés : Autism  ASD  Cognitive emotion regulation  Comorbidity  Anxiety  Depression Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : AbstractGoal To investigate the relationship between cognitive emotion regulation and anxiety and depression in adults with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Methods One hundred and twenty-one adults with ASD were compared to neurotypical adults, matched on age and gender. Cognitive emotion regulation was measured with the Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (CERQ). Anxiety and depression were measured using the Symptom Check List (SCL-90). Results The ASD group reported more use of the strategy “Other-blame” and less use of “Positive reappraisal” than the control group. A significant relationship was found between cognitive emotion regulation strategies and anxiety and depression in the ASD group. There were no differences found in the strength of the relationship between cognitive emotion regulation and anxiety and depression, except for the relationship between “Catastrophizing” and depression, which was more strongly related in neurotypical adults. Conclusion Adults with ASD do not use less cognitive emotion regulation strategies, but use more “Other-blame” and less “Positive reappraisal”. There was no difference between the ASD group and the neurotypical group regarding the strength of the relationship between the cognitive emotion regulation strategies and anxiety and depression. These results encourage the use of cognitive therapy for depression and anxiety in people with ASD. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2015.11.003 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=278

Development, behaviour and autism in individuals with SMC1A variants / P. A. MULDER in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 60-3 (March 2019)  

Public ISBD [article]  inJournal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 60-3 (March 2019) . - p.305-313 Titre : Development, behaviour and autism in individuals with SMC1A variants Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : P. A. MULDER, Auteur ; S. HUISMAN, Auteur ; A. M. LANDLUST, Auteur ; J. MOSS, Auteur ; S. PIENING, Auteur ; R. C. HENNEKAM, Auteur ; I. D. C. VAN BALKOM, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.305-313 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Behavioural phenotype  autism  cognition  cornelia de lange syndrome  rett syndrome  self-injurious behaviour Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : INTRODUCTION: Development and behaviour in Cornelia de Lange Syndrome (CdLS), including autism characteristics, have been described infrequently stratified to genetic cause and only a few studies have considered behavioural characteristics in relation to developmental level. Here, we describe the behavioural phenotype in individuals with CdLS with SMC1A variants. METHODS: We performed an international, interdisciplinary study on 51 individuals with SMC1A variants. Results of questionnaire studies are compared to those in individuals with Down Syndrome and with Autism Spectrum Disorder. Results on cognition and self-injurious behaviour (SIB) are compared to those in individuals with CdLS caused by NIPBL variants. For Dutch participants with SMC1A variants we performed direct in-person assessments of cognition, autism, and added an interview and questionnaire on adaptive behaviour and sensory processing. RESULTS: Individuals with SMC1A variants show a higher cognitive level and less SIB than individuals with NIPBL variants. Individuals with SMC1A variants without classic CdLS phenotype but with a Rett-like phenotype show more severe intellectual disability and more SIB compared to those with a CdLS phenotype. Autism is less present if outcomes in direct in-person assessments are evaluated taking developmental level into account compared to results based on a questionnaire. CONCLUSIONS: Behaviour in individuals with CdLS should be evaluated taking genetic cause into account. Detailed interdisciplinary approaches are of clinical importance to inform tailored care and may eventually improve quality of life of patients and families. En ligne : https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12979 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=385 [article] Development, behaviour and autism in individuals with SMC1A variants [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / P. A. MULDER, Auteur ; S. HUISMAN, Auteur ; A. M. LANDLUST, Auteur ; J. MOSS, Auteur ; S. PIENING, Auteur ; R. C. HENNEKAM, Auteur ; I. D. C. VAN BALKOM, Auteur . - p.305-313. Langues : Anglais (eng) in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 60-3 (March 2019) . - p.305-313 Mots-clés : Behavioural phenotype  autism  cognition  cornelia de lange syndrome  rett syndrome  self-injurious behaviour Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : INTRODUCTION: Development and behaviour in Cornelia de Lange Syndrome (CdLS), including autism characteristics, have been described infrequently stratified to genetic cause and only a few studies have considered behavioural characteristics in relation to developmental level. Here, we describe the behavioural phenotype in individuals with CdLS with SMC1A variants. METHODS: We performed an international, interdisciplinary study on 51 individuals with SMC1A variants. Results of questionnaire studies are compared to those in individuals with Down Syndrome and with Autism Spectrum Disorder. Results on cognition and self-injurious behaviour (SIB) are compared to those in individuals with CdLS caused by NIPBL variants. For Dutch participants with SMC1A variants we performed direct in-person assessments of cognition, autism, and added an interview and questionnaire on adaptive behaviour and sensory processing. RESULTS: Individuals with SMC1A variants show a higher cognitive level and less SIB than individuals with NIPBL variants. Individuals with SMC1A variants without classic CdLS phenotype but with a Rett-like phenotype show more severe intellectual disability and more SIB compared to those with a CdLS phenotype. Autism is less present if outcomes in direct in-person assessments are evaluated taking developmental level into account compared to results based on a questionnaire. CONCLUSIONS: Behaviour in individuals with CdLS should be evaluated taking genetic cause into account. Detailed interdisciplinary approaches are of clinical importance to inform tailored care and may eventually improve quality of life of patients and families. En ligne : https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12979 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=385

---

1 (1 - 2 / 2)