[article] 
inAutism Research > 14-8 (August 2021) . - p.1536-1542

Titre :	Evaluating evidence-based practice in light of the boundedness and proximity of outcomes: Capturing the scope of change
Type de document :	Texte imprimé et/ou numérique
Auteurs :	Micheal SANDBANK, Auteur ; J. CHOW, Auteur ; Kristen BOTTEMA-BEUTEL, Auteur ; Tiffany G. WOYNAROSKI, Auteur
Article en page(s) :	p.1536-1542
Langues :	Anglais (eng)
Mots-clés :	Autism Spectrum Disorder/therapy  Autistic Disorder/therapy  Child  Child, Preschool  Early Intervention, Educational  Evidence-Based Practice  Humans  Outcome Assessment, Health Care  autism  children  evidence-based practice  intervention early  outcome assessment
Index. décimale :	PER Périodiques
Résumé :	Evidence-based practice (EBP) reviews abound in early childhood autism intervention research. These reviews seek to describe and evaluate the evidence supporting the use of specific educational and clinical practices, but give little attention to evaluating intervention outcomes in terms of the extent to which they reflect change that extends beyond the exact targets and contexts of intervention. We urge consideration of these outcome characteristics, which we refer to as "proximity" and "boundedness," as key criteria in evaluating and describing the scope of change effected by EBPs, and provide an overview and illustration of these concepts as they relate to early childhood autism intervention research. We hope this guidance will assist future researchers in selecting and evaluating intervention outcomes, as well as in making important summative determinations of the evidence base for this population. LAY SUMMARY: Recent reviews have come to somewhat different conclusions regarding the evidence base for interventions geared toward autistic children, perhaps because such reviews vary in the degree to which they consider the types of outcome measures used in past studies testing the effects of treatments. Here, we provide guidance regarding characteristics of outcome measures that research suggests are particularly important to consider when evaluating the extent to which an intervention constitutes "evidence-based practice."
En ligne :	http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/aur.2527
Permalink :	https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=449

[article] Evaluating evidence-based practice in light of the boundedness and proximity of outcomes: Capturing the scope of change [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Micheal SANDBANK, Auteur ; J. CHOW, Auteur ; Kristen BOTTEMA-BEUTEL, Auteur ; Tiffany G. WOYNAROSKI, Auteur . - p.1536-1542.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Autism Research > 14-8 (August 2021) . - p.1536-1542

Mots-clés :	Autism Spectrum Disorder/therapy  Autistic Disorder/therapy  Child  Child, Preschool  Early Intervention, Educational  Evidence-Based Practice  Humans  Outcome Assessment, Health Care  autism  children  evidence-based practice  intervention early  outcome assessment
Index. décimale :	PER Périodiques
Résumé :	Evidence-based practice (EBP) reviews abound in early childhood autism intervention research. These reviews seek to describe and evaluate the evidence supporting the use of specific educational and clinical practices, but give little attention to evaluating intervention outcomes in terms of the extent to which they reflect change that extends beyond the exact targets and contexts of intervention. We urge consideration of these outcome characteristics, which we refer to as "proximity" and "boundedness," as key criteria in evaluating and describing the scope of change effected by EBPs, and provide an overview and illustration of these concepts as they relate to early childhood autism intervention research. We hope this guidance will assist future researchers in selecting and evaluating intervention outcomes, as well as in making important summative determinations of the evidence base for this population. LAY SUMMARY: Recent reviews have come to somewhat different conclusions regarding the evidence base for interventions geared toward autistic children, perhaps because such reviews vary in the degree to which they consider the types of outcome measures used in past studies testing the effects of treatments. Here, we provide guidance regarding characteristics of outcome measures that research suggests are particularly important to consider when evaluating the extent to which an intervention constitutes "evidence-based practice."
En ligne :	http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/aur.2527
Permalink :	https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=449