Early childhood impulsivity and parenting predict children?s development of externalizing psychopathology / Emma K. STEWART in Development and Psychopathology, 36-3 (August 2024)  

Public ISBD [article]  inDevelopment and Psychopathology > 36-3 (August 2024) . - p.1249-1261 Titre : Early childhood impulsivity and parenting predict children?s development of externalizing psychopathology Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Emma K. STEWART, Auteur ; Yuliya KOTELNIKOVA, Auteur ; Thomas M. OLINO, Auteur ; Elizabeth P. HAYDEN, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.1249-1261 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : developmental psychopathology  externalizing symptoms  impulsivity  parenting Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Parenting and child impulsivity are consistent predictors of children?s externalizing symptoms; however, the role of the range of parenting (i.e., variation in parenting across contexts), and its interactions with child impulsivity, are poorly understood. We examined whether characteristic parenting practices and parenting range predicted the course of externalizing symptoms in 409 children (Mage = 3.43 years at baseline, 208 girls) across ages 3, 5, 8, and 11. We assessed parent positive affectivity (PPA), hostility, and parenting structure at child age 3 using three behavioral tasks that varied in context, examining range by modeling a latent difference score for each parenting dimension. Greater PPA range, mean structure, and parenting structure range all predicted fewer symptoms at age 3 for children with higher impulsivity. Lower mean hostility predicted fewer symptoms at age 3 for children with lower impulsivity. Greater PPA, and smaller PPA range, predicted a decrease in symptoms for children higher in impulsivity. Lower hostility range predicted a decrease in symptoms for children with lower impulsivity but predicted maintaining symptoms for children with higher impulsivity. Results demonstrate the differential roles average parenting practices and parenting range play in the development of child externalizing psychopathology, especially in the context of child impulsivity. En ligne : https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0954579423000482 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=538 [article] Early childhood impulsivity and parenting predict children?s development of externalizing psychopathology [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Emma K. STEWART, Auteur ; Yuliya KOTELNIKOVA, Auteur ; Thomas M. OLINO, Auteur ; Elizabeth P. HAYDEN, Auteur . - p.1249-1261. Langues : Anglais (eng) in Development and Psychopathology > 36-3 (August 2024) . - p.1249-1261 Mots-clés : developmental psychopathology  externalizing symptoms  impulsivity  parenting Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Parenting and child impulsivity are consistent predictors of children?s externalizing symptoms; however, the role of the range of parenting (i.e., variation in parenting across contexts), and its interactions with child impulsivity, are poorly understood. We examined whether characteristic parenting practices and parenting range predicted the course of externalizing symptoms in 409 children (Mage = 3.43 years at baseline, 208 girls) across ages 3, 5, 8, and 11. We assessed parent positive affectivity (PPA), hostility, and parenting structure at child age 3 using three behavioral tasks that varied in context, examining range by modeling a latent difference score for each parenting dimension. Greater PPA range, mean structure, and parenting structure range all predicted fewer symptoms at age 3 for children with higher impulsivity. Lower mean hostility predicted fewer symptoms at age 3 for children with lower impulsivity. Greater PPA, and smaller PPA range, predicted a decrease in symptoms for children higher in impulsivity. Lower hostility range predicted a decrease in symptoms for children with lower impulsivity but predicted maintaining symptoms for children with higher impulsivity. Results demonstrate the differential roles average parenting practices and parenting range play in the development of child externalizing psychopathology, especially in the context of child impulsivity. En ligne : https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0954579423000482 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=538

Structure of internalizing and externalizing symptoms in early adolescence: A comparison of a bifactor and a two-factor model over time and across reporters / Matthew D. SCALCO in Development and Psychopathology, 37-3 (August 2025)  

Public ISBD [article]  inDevelopment and Psychopathology > 37-3 (August 2025) . - p.1230-1256 Titre : Structure of internalizing and externalizing symptoms in early adolescence: A comparison of a bifactor and a two-factor model over time and across reporters Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Matthew D. SCALCO, Auteur ; Yuliya KOTELNIKOVA, Auteur ; Miranda EVANS, Auteur ; Chris HARSHAW, Auteur ; Nicole M. WEBRE, Auteur ; Lilliana J. LENGUA, Auteur ; Craig R. COLDER, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.1230-1256 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Bifactor  externalizing  internalizing  structure of psychopathology  validity Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Psychopathology assessed across the lifespan often can be summarized with a few broad dimensions: internalizing, externalizing, and psychosis/thought disorder. Extensive overlap between internalizing and externalizing symptoms has garnered interest in bifactor models comprised of a general co-occurring factor and specific internalizing and externalizing factors. We focus on internalizing and externalizing symptoms and compare a bifactor model to a correlated two-factor model of psychopathology at three timepoints in a large adolescent community sample (N = 387; 55 % female; 83% Caucasian; M age = 12.1 at wave 1) using self- and parent-reports. Each model was tested within each time-point with 25-28 validators. The bifactor models demonstrated better fit to the data. Child report had stronger invariance across time. Parent report had stronger reliability over time. Cross-informant correlations between the factors at each wave indicated that the bifactor model had slightly poorer convergent validity but stronger discriminant validity than the two-factor model. With notable exceptions, this pattern of results replicated across informants and waves. The overlap between internalizing and externalizing pathology is systematically and, sometimes, non-linearly related to risk factors and maladaptive outcomes. Strengths and weaknesses to modeling psychopathology as two or three factors and clinical and developmental design implications are discussed. En ligne : https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/85AF9A024ACC47A09D2E53715DE5815D Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=564 [article] Structure of internalizing and externalizing symptoms in early adolescence: A comparison of a bifactor and a two-factor model over time and across reporters [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Matthew D. SCALCO, Auteur ; Yuliya KOTELNIKOVA, Auteur ; Miranda EVANS, Auteur ; Chris HARSHAW, Auteur ; Nicole M. WEBRE, Auteur ; Lilliana J. LENGUA, Auteur ; Craig R. COLDER, Auteur . - p.1230-1256. Langues : Anglais (eng) in Development and Psychopathology > 37-3 (August 2025) . - p.1230-1256 Mots-clés : Bifactor  externalizing  internalizing  structure of psychopathology  validity Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Psychopathology assessed across the lifespan often can be summarized with a few broad dimensions: internalizing, externalizing, and psychosis/thought disorder. Extensive overlap between internalizing and externalizing symptoms has garnered interest in bifactor models comprised of a general co-occurring factor and specific internalizing and externalizing factors. We focus on internalizing and externalizing symptoms and compare a bifactor model to a correlated two-factor model of psychopathology at three timepoints in a large adolescent community sample (N = 387; 55 % female; 83% Caucasian; M age = 12.1 at wave 1) using self- and parent-reports. Each model was tested within each time-point with 25-28 validators. The bifactor models demonstrated better fit to the data. Child report had stronger invariance across time. Parent report had stronger reliability over time. Cross-informant correlations between the factors at each wave indicated that the bifactor model had slightly poorer convergent validity but stronger discriminant validity than the two-factor model. With notable exceptions, this pattern of results replicated across informants and waves. The overlap between internalizing and externalizing pathology is systematically and, sometimes, non-linearly related to risk factors and maladaptive outcomes. Strengths and weaknesses to modeling psychopathology as two or three factors and clinical and developmental design implications are discussed. En ligne : https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/85AF9A024ACC47A09D2E53715DE5815D Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=564

---

1 (1 - 2 / 2)