
- <Centre d'Information et de documentation du CRA Rhône-Alpes
- CRA
- Informations pratiques
-
Adresse
Centre d'information et de documentation
Horaires
du CRA Rhône-Alpes
Centre Hospitalier le Vinatier
bât 211
95, Bd Pinel
69678 Bron CedexLundi au Vendredi
Contact
9h00-12h00 13h30-16h00Tél: +33(0)4 37 91 54 65
Mail
Fax: +33(0)4 37 91 54 37
-
Adresse
Auteur Amit YASHAR
|
|
Documents disponibles écrits par cet auteur (2)
Faire une suggestion Affiner la rechercheAtypical Attentional Effort During Visual Search in Autistic Adults: Evidence From Task-Evoked Pupillary Responses / Zainab NAARAN in Autism Research, 19-9 (September 2026)
![]()
[article]
Titre : Atypical Attentional Effort During Visual Search in Autistic Adults: Evidence From Task-Evoked Pupillary Responses Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Zainab NAARAN, Auteur ; Amit YASHAR, Auteur Article en page(s) : p. e70332 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : attention allocation autism spectrum disorder intertrial repetition effect task-evoked pupillary response visual search Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : ABSTRACT According to prevalent views, autistic individuals have a stronger tendency to allocate attention to details, as supported by reports of enhanced visual search performance. However, both the dynamics and the types of information involved in attentional guidance in autism are not fully understood. We addressed this issue by testing the influence of search history on visual search performance and pupil size in a long search display (Experiment 1) and on accuracy in a brief and masked?more attentionally demanding?search display (Experiment 2). Autistic (N?=?48) and non-autistic (N?=?45) participants searched for a color singleton target (all equiluminant colors) and responded by identifying its shape. In each trial, the target and distractor colors could be repeated, switched, or novel with respect to the previous trial. In Experiment 1, while overall reaction time was comparable across groups, the task-evoked pupillary responses (TEPRs) were smaller in the autistic group, indicating reduced attentional effort in autism. In Experiment 2, in a more attentionally demanding display, autistic individuals showed superior search accuracy. In both experiments, both groups showed a reliable effect of recent search history on performance, indicating that, similar to non-autistic individuals, autistic individuals rely on recent experience during attentional allocation. Alterations in attentional allocation and its interaction with recent experience in autism were reflected in pupil responses. These alterations may provide a sensitive marker of differences in the dynamics of attentional allocation in autism, which are reflected in behavioral measurements when display conditions are more attentionally demanding. En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1002/aur.70332 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=592
in Autism Research > 19-9 (September 2026) . - p. e70332[article] Atypical Attentional Effort During Visual Search in Autistic Adults: Evidence From Task-Evoked Pupillary Responses [texte imprimé] / Zainab NAARAN, Auteur ; Amit YASHAR, Auteur . - p. e70332.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Autism Research > 19-9 (September 2026) . - p. e70332
Mots-clés : attention allocation autism spectrum disorder intertrial repetition effect task-evoked pupillary response visual search Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : ABSTRACT According to prevalent views, autistic individuals have a stronger tendency to allocate attention to details, as supported by reports of enhanced visual search performance. However, both the dynamics and the types of information involved in attentional guidance in autism are not fully understood. We addressed this issue by testing the influence of search history on visual search performance and pupil size in a long search display (Experiment 1) and on accuracy in a brief and masked?more attentionally demanding?search display (Experiment 2). Autistic (N?=?48) and non-autistic (N?=?45) participants searched for a color singleton target (all equiluminant colors) and responded by identifying its shape. In each trial, the target and distractor colors could be repeated, switched, or novel with respect to the previous trial. In Experiment 1, while overall reaction time was comparable across groups, the task-evoked pupillary responses (TEPRs) were smaller in the autistic group, indicating reduced attentional effort in autism. In Experiment 2, in a more attentionally demanding display, autistic individuals showed superior search accuracy. In both experiments, both groups showed a reliable effect of recent search history on performance, indicating that, similar to non-autistic individuals, autistic individuals rely on recent experience during attentional allocation. Alterations in attentional allocation and its interaction with recent experience in autism were reflected in pupil responses. These alterations may provide a sensitive marker of differences in the dynamics of attentional allocation in autism, which are reflected in behavioral measurements when display conditions are more attentionally demanding. En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1002/aur.70332 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=592 Suboptimal but intact integration of Bayesian components during perceptual decision-making in autism / Bat-Sheva HADAD ; Rachel N DENISON ; Amit YASHAR in Molecular Autism, 16 (2025)
![]()
[article]
Titre : Suboptimal but intact integration of Bayesian components during perceptual decision-making in autism Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Bat-Sheva HADAD, Auteur ; Rachel N DENISON, Auteur ; Amit YASHAR, Auteur Article en page(s) : 2 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Humans Bayes Theorem Decision Making Autistic Disorder/physiopathology/psychology Male Female Adult Young Adult Perception Adolescent Autism spectrum disorder Bayesian perception Decision-making Suboptimality provided written informed consent and the two studies received ethical clearance from the Institutional Review Board at the University of Haifa under the reference number 046/20. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests. Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : BACKGROUND: Alterations in sensory perception, a core phenotype of autism, are attributed to imbalanced integration of sensory information and prior knowledge during perceptual statistical (Bayesian) inference. This hypothesis has gained momentum in recent years, partly because it can be implemented both at the computational level, as in Bayesian perception, and at the level of canonical neural microcircuitry, as in predictive coding. However, empirical investigations have yielded conflicting results with evidence remaining limited. Critically, previous studies did not assess the independent contributions of priors and sensory uncertainty to the inference. METHOD: We addressed this gap by quantitatively assessing both the independent and interdependent contributions of priors and sensory uncertainty to perceptual decision-making in autistic and non-autistic individuals (N = 126) during an orientation categorization task. RESULTS: Contrary to common views, autistic individuals integrated the two Bayesian components into their decision behavior, and did so indistinguishably from non-autistic individuals. Both groups adjusted their decision criteria in a suboptimal manner. LIMITATIONS: This study focuses on explicit priors in a perceptual categorization task and high-functioning adults. Thus, although the findings provide strong evidence against a general and basic alteration in prior integration in autism, they cannot rule out more specific cases of reduced prior effect - such as due to implicit prior learning, particular level of decision making (e.g., social), and level of functioning of the autistic person. CONCLUSIONS: These results reveal intact inference for autistic individuals during perceptual decision-making, challenging the notion that Bayesian computations are fundamentally altered in autism. En ligne : https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13229-025-00639-3 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=555
in Molecular Autism > 16 (2025) . - 2[article] Suboptimal but intact integration of Bayesian components during perceptual decision-making in autism [texte imprimé] / Bat-Sheva HADAD, Auteur ; Rachel N DENISON, Auteur ; Amit YASHAR, Auteur . - 2.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Molecular Autism > 16 (2025) . - 2
Mots-clés : Humans Bayes Theorem Decision Making Autistic Disorder/physiopathology/psychology Male Female Adult Young Adult Perception Adolescent Autism spectrum disorder Bayesian perception Decision-making Suboptimality provided written informed consent and the two studies received ethical clearance from the Institutional Review Board at the University of Haifa under the reference number 046/20. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests. Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : BACKGROUND: Alterations in sensory perception, a core phenotype of autism, are attributed to imbalanced integration of sensory information and prior knowledge during perceptual statistical (Bayesian) inference. This hypothesis has gained momentum in recent years, partly because it can be implemented both at the computational level, as in Bayesian perception, and at the level of canonical neural microcircuitry, as in predictive coding. However, empirical investigations have yielded conflicting results with evidence remaining limited. Critically, previous studies did not assess the independent contributions of priors and sensory uncertainty to the inference. METHOD: We addressed this gap by quantitatively assessing both the independent and interdependent contributions of priors and sensory uncertainty to perceptual decision-making in autistic and non-autistic individuals (N = 126) during an orientation categorization task. RESULTS: Contrary to common views, autistic individuals integrated the two Bayesian components into their decision behavior, and did so indistinguishably from non-autistic individuals. Both groups adjusted their decision criteria in a suboptimal manner. LIMITATIONS: This study focuses on explicit priors in a perceptual categorization task and high-functioning adults. Thus, although the findings provide strong evidence against a general and basic alteration in prior integration in autism, they cannot rule out more specific cases of reduced prior effect - such as due to implicit prior learning, particular level of decision making (e.g., social), and level of functioning of the autistic person. CONCLUSIONS: These results reveal intact inference for autistic individuals during perceptual decision-making, challenging the notion that Bayesian computations are fundamentally altered in autism. En ligne : https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13229-025-00639-3 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=555

