Centre d'Information et de documentation du CRA Rhône-Alpes
CRA
Informations pratiques
-
Adresse
Centre d'information et de documentation
du CRA Rhône-Alpes
Centre Hospitalier le Vinatier
bât 211
95, Bd Pinel
69678 Bron CedexHoraires
Lundi au Vendredi
9h00-12h00 13h30-16h00Contact
Tél: +33(0)4 37 91 54 65
Mail
Fax: +33(0)4 37 91 54 37
-
Résultat de la recherche
2 recherche sur le mot-clé 'Inter-rater reliability'
Affiner la recherche Générer le flux rss de la recherche
Partager le résultat de cette recherche Faire une suggestion
Inter-rater reliability of parent and preschool teacher ratings of language in children with autism / Anders NORDAHL-HANSEN in Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 7-11 (November 2013)
[article]
Titre : Inter-rater reliability of parent and preschool teacher ratings of language in children with autism Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Anders NORDAHL-HANSEN, Auteur ; Anett KAALE, Auteur ; Stein Erik ULVUND, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.1391-1396 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Language Autism Inter-rater reliability MacArthur CDI Parents Preschool teachers Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Abstract Parent reports such as MacArthur-Bates Communicative Development Inventories (CDIs) have been suggested as a measure of language in young children with autism since this group often score below base levels of direct tests. However, questions have been raised concerning the reliability of report-based assessments. Parents and preschool teachers filled out the CDI–Words amp; Gestures for 55 children diagnosed with autistic disorder. Inter-rater reliability analyses were done for the whole sample and a subgroup of minimally verbal children (n = 28). Further, potential over- or under-estimation, comparing the raters was analyzed. Results suggested excellent to fair inter-rater reliability between parent and preschool teacher. Parents tended to rate the children slightly higher than preschool teachers. However, the differences were small, and most likely due to contextual variations. These findings suggest that parents can be reliable sources of information about language abilities in children with autism. Therefore, when children are difficult to assess through direct tests, parent reports such as the CDI can be a good alternative. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2013.08.006 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=215
in Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders > 7-11 (November 2013) . - p.1391-1396[article] Inter-rater reliability of parent and preschool teacher ratings of language in children with autism [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Anders NORDAHL-HANSEN, Auteur ; Anett KAALE, Auteur ; Stein Erik ULVUND, Auteur . - p.1391-1396.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders > 7-11 (November 2013) . - p.1391-1396
Mots-clés : Language Autism Inter-rater reliability MacArthur CDI Parents Preschool teachers Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Abstract Parent reports such as MacArthur-Bates Communicative Development Inventories (CDIs) have been suggested as a measure of language in young children with autism since this group often score below base levels of direct tests. However, questions have been raised concerning the reliability of report-based assessments. Parents and preschool teachers filled out the CDI–Words amp; Gestures for 55 children diagnosed with autistic disorder. Inter-rater reliability analyses were done for the whole sample and a subgroup of minimally verbal children (n = 28). Further, potential over- or under-estimation, comparing the raters was analyzed. Results suggested excellent to fair inter-rater reliability between parent and preschool teacher. Parents tended to rate the children slightly higher than preschool teachers. However, the differences were small, and most likely due to contextual variations. These findings suggest that parents can be reliable sources of information about language abilities in children with autism. Therefore, when children are difficult to assess through direct tests, parent reports such as the CDI can be a good alternative. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2013.08.006 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=215 Reliability of the ADI-R for the Single Case-Part II: Clinical Versus Statistical Significance / Domenic V. CICCHETTI in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 44-12 (December 2014)
[article]
Titre : Reliability of the ADI-R for the Single Case-Part II: Clinical Versus Statistical Significance Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Domenic V. CICCHETTI, Auteur ; Catherine LORD, Auteur ; Kathy KOENIG, Auteur ; Ami KLIN, Auteur ; Fred R. VOLKMAR, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.3154-3160 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Autism Clinical significance Statistical significance Inter-rater reliability Multiple raters, one patient Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : In an earlier investigation, the authors assessed the reliability of the ADI-R when multiple clinicians evaluated a single case, here a female 3 year old toddler suspected of having an autism spectrum disorder (Cicchetti et al. in J Autism Dev Disord 38:764–770, 2008). Applying the clinical criteria of Cicchetti and Sparrow (Am J Men Def 86:127–137, 1981); and those of Cicchetti et al. (Child Neuropsychol 126–137, 1995): 74 % of the ADI-R items showed 100 % agreement; 6 % showed excellent agreement; 7 % showed good agreement; 3 % manifested average agreement; and the remaining 10 % evidenced poor agreement. In this follow-up investigation, the authors described and applied a novel method for determining levels of statistical significance of the reliability coefficients obtained in the earlier investigation. It is based upon a modification of the Z test for comparing a given level of inter-examiner reliability with a lower limit value of 70 % (Dixon and Massey in Introduction to statistical analysis. McGraw-Hill, New York, 1957). Results indicated that every item producing a clinically acceptable level of inter-examiner reliability was also statistically significant. However, the reverse was not true, since a number of the items with statistically significant reliability levels did not reach levels of agreement that were clinically meaningful. This indicated that clinical significance was an accurate marker of statistical significance. The generalization of these findings to other areas of diagnostic interest and importance is also examined. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10803-014-2177-8 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=243
in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders > 44-12 (December 2014) . - p.3154-3160[article] Reliability of the ADI-R for the Single Case-Part II: Clinical Versus Statistical Significance [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Domenic V. CICCHETTI, Auteur ; Catherine LORD, Auteur ; Kathy KOENIG, Auteur ; Ami KLIN, Auteur ; Fred R. VOLKMAR, Auteur . - p.3154-3160.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders > 44-12 (December 2014) . - p.3154-3160
Mots-clés : Autism Clinical significance Statistical significance Inter-rater reliability Multiple raters, one patient Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : In an earlier investigation, the authors assessed the reliability of the ADI-R when multiple clinicians evaluated a single case, here a female 3 year old toddler suspected of having an autism spectrum disorder (Cicchetti et al. in J Autism Dev Disord 38:764–770, 2008). Applying the clinical criteria of Cicchetti and Sparrow (Am J Men Def 86:127–137, 1981); and those of Cicchetti et al. (Child Neuropsychol 126–137, 1995): 74 % of the ADI-R items showed 100 % agreement; 6 % showed excellent agreement; 7 % showed good agreement; 3 % manifested average agreement; and the remaining 10 % evidenced poor agreement. In this follow-up investigation, the authors described and applied a novel method for determining levels of statistical significance of the reliability coefficients obtained in the earlier investigation. It is based upon a modification of the Z test for comparing a given level of inter-examiner reliability with a lower limit value of 70 % (Dixon and Massey in Introduction to statistical analysis. McGraw-Hill, New York, 1957). Results indicated that every item producing a clinically acceptable level of inter-examiner reliability was also statistically significant. However, the reverse was not true, since a number of the items with statistically significant reliability levels did not reach levels of agreement that were clinically meaningful. This indicated that clinical significance was an accurate marker of statistical significance. The generalization of these findings to other areas of diagnostic interest and importance is also examined. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10803-014-2177-8 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=243