Commentary: Why treatment is the best choice for childhood mental disorders - a commentary on Roest et al. (2022) / Tycho J. DEKKERS in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 64-3 (March 2023)  

Public ISBD [article]  inJournal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 64-3 (March 2023) . - p.470-473 Titre : Commentary: Why treatment is the best choice for childhood mental disorders - a commentary on Roest et al. (2022) Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Tycho J. DEKKERS, Auteur ; Annabeth P. GROENMAN, Auteur ; Pim CUIJPERS, Auteur ; Pieter J. HOEKSTRA, Auteur ; Marjolein LUMAN, Auteur ; Bram OROBIO DE CASTRO, Auteur ; Geertjan OVERBEEK, Auteur ; Arne POPMA, Auteur ; Nanda N. ROMMELSE, Auteur ; Elske SALEMINK, Auteur ; Yvonne A.J. STIKKELBROEK, Auteur ; Barbara J. VAN DEN HOOFDAKKER, Auteur ; Saskia VAN DER OORD, Auteur ; Patty LEIJTEN, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.470-473 Langues : Anglais (eng) Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : An important question in mental healthcare for children is whether treatments are effective and safe in the long run. Here, we comment on a recent editorial perspective by Roest et al. (2022), who argue, based on an overview of systematic reviews, ˜that there is no convincing evidence that interventions for the most common childhood disorders are beneficial in the long term’. We believe that the available evidence does not justify this conclusion and express our concern regarding the harmful effects of their message. We show that there is evidence to suggest beneficial longer term treatment effects for each of the disorders and explain why evidence-based treatment should be offered to children with mental disorders. En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.13715 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=493 [article] Commentary: Why treatment is the best choice for childhood mental disorders - a commentary on Roest et al. (2022) [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Tycho J. DEKKERS, Auteur ; Annabeth P. GROENMAN, Auteur ; Pim CUIJPERS, Auteur ; Pieter J. HOEKSTRA, Auteur ; Marjolein LUMAN, Auteur ; Bram OROBIO DE CASTRO, Auteur ; Geertjan OVERBEEK, Auteur ; Arne POPMA, Auteur ; Nanda N. ROMMELSE, Auteur ; Elske SALEMINK, Auteur ; Yvonne A.J. STIKKELBROEK, Auteur ; Barbara J. VAN DEN HOOFDAKKER, Auteur ; Saskia VAN DER OORD, Auteur ; Patty LEIJTEN, Auteur . - p.470-473. Langues : Anglais (eng) in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 64-3 (March 2023) . - p.470-473 Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : An important question in mental healthcare for children is whether treatments are effective and safe in the long run. Here, we comment on a recent editorial perspective by Roest et al. (2022), who argue, based on an overview of systematic reviews, ˜that there is no convincing evidence that interventions for the most common childhood disorders are beneficial in the long term’. We believe that the available evidence does not justify this conclusion and express our concern regarding the harmful effects of their message. We show that there is evidence to suggest beneficial longer term treatment effects for each of the disorders and explain why evidence-based treatment should be offered to children with mental disorders. En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.13715 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=493

Comparison of eye movement desensitization and reprocessing therapy, cognitive behavioral writing therapy, and wait-list in pediatric posttraumatic stress disorder following single-incident trauma: a multicenter randomized clinical trial / Carlijn DE ROOS in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 58-11 (November 2017)  

Public ISBD [article]  inJournal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 58-11 (November 2017) . - p.1219-1228 Titre : Comparison of eye movement desensitization and reprocessing therapy, cognitive behavioral writing therapy, and wait-list in pediatric posttraumatic stress disorder following single-incident trauma: a multicenter randomized clinical trial Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Carlijn DE ROOS, Auteur ; Saskia VAN DER OORD, Auteur ; Bonne ZIJLSTRA, Auteur ; Sacha LUCASSEN, Auteur ; Sean PERRIN, Auteur ; Paul EMMELKAMP, Auteur ; Ad DE JONGH, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.1219-1228 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Posttraumatic stress disorder  eye movement desensitization and reprocessing  cognitive behavioral writing therapy  single trauma  children and adolescents Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Background Practice guidelines for childhood posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) recommend trauma-focused psychotherapies, mainly cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT). Eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR) therapy is a brief trauma-focused, evidence-based treatment for PTSD in adults, but with few well-designed trials involving children and adolescents. Methods We conducted a single-blind, randomized trial with three arms (n = 103): EMDR (n = 43), Cognitive Behavior Writing Therapy (CBWT; n = 42), and wait-list (WL; n = 18). WL participants were randomly reallocated to CBWT or EMDR after 6 weeks; follow-ups were conducted at 3 and 12 months posttreatment. Participants were treatment-seeking youth (aged 8–18 years) with a DSM-IV diagnosis of PTSD (or subthreshold PTSD) tied to a single trauma, who received up to six sessions of EMDR or CBWT lasting maximally 45 min each. Results Both treatments were well-tolerated and relative to WL yielded large, intent-to-treat effect sizes for the primary outcomes at posttreatment: PTSD symptoms (EMDR: d = 1.27; CBWT: d = 1.24). At posttreatment 92.5% of EMDR, and 90.2% of CBWT no longer met the diagnostic criteria for PTSD. All gains were maintained at follow-up. Compared to WL, small to large (range d = 0.39–1.03) intent-to-treat effect sizes were obtained at posttreatment for negative trauma-related appraisals, anxiety, depression, and behavior problems with these gains being maintained at follow-up. Gains were attained with significantly less therapist contact time for EMDR than CBWT (mean = 4.1 sessions/140 min vs. 5.4 sessions/227 min). Conclusions EMDR and CBWT are brief, trauma-focused treatments that yielded equally large remission rates for PTSD and reductions in the severity of PTSD and comorbid difficulties in children and adolescents seeking treatment for PTSD tied to a single event. Further trials of both treatments with PTSD tied to multiple traumas are warranted. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12768 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=326 [article] Comparison of eye movement desensitization and reprocessing therapy, cognitive behavioral writing therapy, and wait-list in pediatric posttraumatic stress disorder following single-incident trauma: a multicenter randomized clinical trial [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Carlijn DE ROOS, Auteur ; Saskia VAN DER OORD, Auteur ; Bonne ZIJLSTRA, Auteur ; Sacha LUCASSEN, Auteur ; Sean PERRIN, Auteur ; Paul EMMELKAMP, Auteur ; Ad DE JONGH, Auteur . - p.1219-1228. Langues : Anglais (eng) in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 58-11 (November 2017) . - p.1219-1228 Mots-clés : Posttraumatic stress disorder  eye movement desensitization and reprocessing  cognitive behavioral writing therapy  single trauma  children and adolescents Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Background Practice guidelines for childhood posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) recommend trauma-focused psychotherapies, mainly cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT). Eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR) therapy is a brief trauma-focused, evidence-based treatment for PTSD in adults, but with few well-designed trials involving children and adolescents. Methods We conducted a single-blind, randomized trial with three arms (n = 103): EMDR (n = 43), Cognitive Behavior Writing Therapy (CBWT; n = 42), and wait-list (WL; n = 18). WL participants were randomly reallocated to CBWT or EMDR after 6 weeks; follow-ups were conducted at 3 and 12 months posttreatment. Participants were treatment-seeking youth (aged 8–18 years) with a DSM-IV diagnosis of PTSD (or subthreshold PTSD) tied to a single trauma, who received up to six sessions of EMDR or CBWT lasting maximally 45 min each. Results Both treatments were well-tolerated and relative to WL yielded large, intent-to-treat effect sizes for the primary outcomes at posttreatment: PTSD symptoms (EMDR: d = 1.27; CBWT: d = 1.24). At posttreatment 92.5% of EMDR, and 90.2% of CBWT no longer met the diagnostic criteria for PTSD. All gains were maintained at follow-up. Compared to WL, small to large (range d = 0.39–1.03) intent-to-treat effect sizes were obtained at posttreatment for negative trauma-related appraisals, anxiety, depression, and behavior problems with these gains being maintained at follow-up. Gains were attained with significantly less therapist contact time for EMDR than CBWT (mean = 4.1 sessions/140 min vs. 5.4 sessions/227 min). Conclusions EMDR and CBWT are brief, trauma-focused treatments that yielded equally large remission rates for PTSD and reductions in the severity of PTSD and comorbid difficulties in children and adolescents seeking treatment for PTSD tied to a single event. Further trials of both treatments with PTSD tied to multiple traumas are warranted. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12768 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=326

Editorial Perspective: When to start de-implementation of interventions: the case of cognitive training for children with ADHD / Tycho J. DEKKERS in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 64-9 (September 2023)  

Public ISBD [article]  inJournal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 64-9 (September 2023) . - p.1399-1401 Titre : Editorial Perspective: When to start de-implementation of interventions: the case of cognitive training for children with ADHD Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Tycho J. DEKKERS, Auteur ; Saskia VAN DER OORD, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.1399-1401 Langues : Anglais (eng) Index. décimale : PER Périodiques En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.13751 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=512 [article] Editorial Perspective: When to start de-implementation of interventions: the case of cognitive training for children with ADHD [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Tycho J. DEKKERS, Auteur ; Saskia VAN DER OORD, Auteur . - p.1399-1401. Langues : Anglais (eng) in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 64-9 (September 2023) . - p.1399-1401 Index. décimale : PER Périodiques En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.13751 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=512

Instrumental learning and behavioral persistence in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity-disorder: does reinforcement frequency matter? / An-Katrien HULSBOSCH in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 64-11 (November 2023)  

Public ISBD [article]  inJournal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 64-11 (November 2023) . - p.1631-1640 Titre : Instrumental learning and behavioral persistence in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity-disorder: does reinforcement frequency matter? Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : An-Katrien HULSBOSCH, Auteur ; Tom BECKERS, Auteur ; Hasse DE MEYER, Auteur ; Marina DANCKAERTS, Auteur ; Dagmar VAN LIEFFERINGE, Auteur ; Gail TRIPP, Auteur ; Saskia VAN DER OORD, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.1631-1640 Langues : Anglais (eng) Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Background Prominent theoretical accounts of attention-deficit/hyperactivity-disorder (ADHD) hypothesize that reinforcement learning deficits underlie symptoms of ADHD. The Dynamic Developmental Theory and the Dopamine Transfer Deficit hypothesis assume impairments in both the acquisition and extinction of behavior, especially when learning occurs under partial (non-continuous) reinforcement, and subsequently the Partial Reinforcement Extinction Effect (PREE). Few studies have evaluated instrumental learning in ADHD and the results are inconsistent. The current study investigates instrumental learning under partial and continuous reinforcement schedules and subsequent behavioral persistence when reinforcement is withheld (extinction) in children with and without ADHD. Methods Large well-defined samples of children with ADHD (n=93) and typically developing (TD) children (n=73) completed a simple instrumental learning task. The children completed acquisition under continuous (100%) or partial (20%) reinforcement, followed by a 4-min extinction phase. Two-way (diagnosis by condition) ANOVAs evaluated responses needed to reach the learning criterion during acquisition, and target and total responses during extinction. Results Children with ADHD required more trials to reach criterion compared to TD children under both continuous and partial reinforcement. After partial reinforcement, children with ADHD executed fewer target responses during extinction than TD children. Children with ADHD executed more responses than TD children during extinction, irrespective of learning condition. Conclusions The findings demonstrate general difficulties in instrumental learning in ADHD, that is, slower learning irrespective of reinforcement schedule. They also show faster extinction following learning under partial reinforcement in those with ADHD, that is, a diminished PREE. Children with ADHD executed more responses during extinction. Results are theoretically important, with clinical implications for understanding and managing learning difficulties in those with ADHD, as they suggest poorer reinforcement learning and lower behavioral persistence. En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.13805 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=512 [article] Instrumental learning and behavioral persistence in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity-disorder: does reinforcement frequency matter? [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / An-Katrien HULSBOSCH, Auteur ; Tom BECKERS, Auteur ; Hasse DE MEYER, Auteur ; Marina DANCKAERTS, Auteur ; Dagmar VAN LIEFFERINGE, Auteur ; Gail TRIPP, Auteur ; Saskia VAN DER OORD, Auteur . - p.1631-1640. Langues : Anglais (eng) in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 64-11 (November 2023) . - p.1631-1640 Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Background Prominent theoretical accounts of attention-deficit/hyperactivity-disorder (ADHD) hypothesize that reinforcement learning deficits underlie symptoms of ADHD. The Dynamic Developmental Theory and the Dopamine Transfer Deficit hypothesis assume impairments in both the acquisition and extinction of behavior, especially when learning occurs under partial (non-continuous) reinforcement, and subsequently the Partial Reinforcement Extinction Effect (PREE). Few studies have evaluated instrumental learning in ADHD and the results are inconsistent. The current study investigates instrumental learning under partial and continuous reinforcement schedules and subsequent behavioral persistence when reinforcement is withheld (extinction) in children with and without ADHD. Methods Large well-defined samples of children with ADHD (n=93) and typically developing (TD) children (n=73) completed a simple instrumental learning task. The children completed acquisition under continuous (100%) or partial (20%) reinforcement, followed by a 4-min extinction phase. Two-way (diagnosis by condition) ANOVAs evaluated responses needed to reach the learning criterion during acquisition, and target and total responses during extinction. Results Children with ADHD required more trials to reach criterion compared to TD children under both continuous and partial reinforcement. After partial reinforcement, children with ADHD executed fewer target responses during extinction than TD children. Children with ADHD executed more responses than TD children during extinction, irrespective of learning condition. Conclusions The findings demonstrate general difficulties in instrumental learning in ADHD, that is, slower learning irrespective of reinforcement schedule. They also show faster extinction following learning under partial reinforcement in those with ADHD, that is, a diminished PREE. Children with ADHD executed more responses during extinction. Results are theoretically important, with clinical implications for understanding and managing learning difficulties in those with ADHD, as they suggest poorer reinforcement learning and lower behavioral persistence. En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.13805 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=512

Practitioner Review: Current best practice in the use of parent training and other behavioural interventions in the treatment of children and adolescents with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder / David DALEY in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 59-9 (September 2018)  

Public ISBD [article]  inJournal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 59-9 (September 2018) . - p.932-947 Titre : Practitioner Review: Current best practice in the use of parent training and other behavioural interventions in the treatment of children and adolescents with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : David DALEY, Auteur ; Saskia VAN DER OORD, Auteur ; Maite FERRIN, Auteur ; Samuele CORTESE, Auteur ; Marina DANCKAERTS, Auteur ; Manfred DOEPFNER, Auteur ; Barbara J. VAN DEN HOOFDAKKER, Auteur ; David COGHILL, Auteur ; Margaret THOMPSON, Auteur ; Philip ASHERSON, Auteur ; Tobias BANASCHEWSKI, Auteur ; Daniel BRANDEIS, Auteur ; Jan K. BUITELAAR, Auteur ; Ralf W. DITTMANN, Auteur ; Chris HOLLIS, Auteur ; Martin HOLTMANN, Auteur ; Eric KONOFAL, Auteur ; Michel LECENDREUX, Auteur ; Aribert ROTHENBERGER, Auteur ; Paramala SANTOSH, Auteur ; Emily SIMONOFF, Auteur ; Cesar SOUTULLO, Auteur ; Hans Christoph STEINHAUSEN, Auteur ; Argyris STRINGARIS, Auteur ; Eric TAYLOR, Auteur ; Ian C. K. WONG, Auteur ; Alessandro ZUDDAS, Auteur ; Edmund J. S. SONUGA-BARKE, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.932-947 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : ADHD  behaviour therapy  conduct disorder  parent training  treatment trials Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Background Behavioural interventions are recommended for use with children and young people with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD); however, specific guidance for their implementation based on the best available evidence is currently lacking. Methods This review used an explicit question and answer format to address issues of clinical concern, based on expert interpretation of the evidence with precedence given to meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials. Results On the basis of current evidence that takes into account whether outcomes are blinded, behavioural intervention cannot be supported as a front-line treatment for core ADHD symptoms. There is, however, evidence from measures that are probably blinded that these interventions benefit parenting practices and improve conduct problems which commonly co-occur with ADHD, and are often the main reason for referral. Initial positive results have also been found in relation to parental knowledge, children's emotional, social and academic functioning ? although most studies have not used blinded outcomes. Generic and specialised ADHD parent training approaches ? delivered either individually or in groups ? have reported beneficial effects. High-quality training, supervision of therapists and practice with the child, may improve outcomes but further evidence is required. Evidence for who benefits the most from behavioural interventions is scant. There is no evidence to limit behavioural treatments to parents with parenting difficulties or children with conduct problems. There are positive effects of additive school-based intervention for the inattentive subtype. Targeting parental depression may enhance the effects of behavioural interventions. Conclusions Parent training is an important part of the multimodal treatment of children with ADHD, which improves parenting, reduces levels of oppositional and noncompliant behaviours and may improve other aspects of functioning. However, blinded evidence does not support it as a specific treatment for core ADHD symptoms. More research is required to understand how to optimise treatment effectiveness either in general or for individual patients and explore potential barriers to treatment uptake and engagement. In terms of selecting which intervention formats to use, it seems important to acknowledge and respond to parental treatment preferences. En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12825 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=368 [article] Practitioner Review: Current best practice in the use of parent training and other behavioural interventions in the treatment of children and adolescents with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / David DALEY, Auteur ; Saskia VAN DER OORD, Auteur ; Maite FERRIN, Auteur ; Samuele CORTESE, Auteur ; Marina DANCKAERTS, Auteur ; Manfred DOEPFNER, Auteur ; Barbara J. VAN DEN HOOFDAKKER, Auteur ; David COGHILL, Auteur ; Margaret THOMPSON, Auteur ; Philip ASHERSON, Auteur ; Tobias BANASCHEWSKI, Auteur ; Daniel BRANDEIS, Auteur ; Jan K. BUITELAAR, Auteur ; Ralf W. DITTMANN, Auteur ; Chris HOLLIS, Auteur ; Martin HOLTMANN, Auteur ; Eric KONOFAL, Auteur ; Michel LECENDREUX, Auteur ; Aribert ROTHENBERGER, Auteur ; Paramala SANTOSH, Auteur ; Emily SIMONOFF, Auteur ; Cesar SOUTULLO, Auteur ; Hans Christoph STEINHAUSEN, Auteur ; Argyris STRINGARIS, Auteur ; Eric TAYLOR, Auteur ; Ian C. K. WONG, Auteur ; Alessandro ZUDDAS, Auteur ; Edmund J. S. SONUGA-BARKE, Auteur . - p.932-947. Langues : Anglais (eng) in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 59-9 (September 2018) . - p.932-947 Mots-clés : ADHD  behaviour therapy  conduct disorder  parent training  treatment trials Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Background Behavioural interventions are recommended for use with children and young people with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD); however, specific guidance for their implementation based on the best available evidence is currently lacking. Methods This review used an explicit question and answer format to address issues of clinical concern, based on expert interpretation of the evidence with precedence given to meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials. Results On the basis of current evidence that takes into account whether outcomes are blinded, behavioural intervention cannot be supported as a front-line treatment for core ADHD symptoms. There is, however, evidence from measures that are probably blinded that these interventions benefit parenting practices and improve conduct problems which commonly co-occur with ADHD, and are often the main reason for referral. Initial positive results have also been found in relation to parental knowledge, children's emotional, social and academic functioning ? although most studies have not used blinded outcomes. Generic and specialised ADHD parent training approaches ? delivered either individually or in groups ? have reported beneficial effects. High-quality training, supervision of therapists and practice with the child, may improve outcomes but further evidence is required. Evidence for who benefits the most from behavioural interventions is scant. There is no evidence to limit behavioural treatments to parents with parenting difficulties or children with conduct problems. There are positive effects of additive school-based intervention for the inattentive subtype. Targeting parental depression may enhance the effects of behavioural interventions. Conclusions Parent training is an important part of the multimodal treatment of children with ADHD, which improves parenting, reduces levels of oppositional and noncompliant behaviours and may improve other aspects of functioning. However, blinded evidence does not support it as a specific treatment for core ADHD symptoms. More research is required to understand how to optimise treatment effectiveness either in general or for individual patients and explore potential barriers to treatment uptake and engagement. In terms of selecting which intervention formats to use, it seems important to acknowledge and respond to parental treatment preferences. En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12825 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=368

---

1 (1 - 5 / 5)