[article] 
inJournal of Autism and Developmental Disorders > 52-12 (December 2022) . - p.5308-5320

Titre :	Defining in Detail and Evaluating Reliability of DSM-5 Criteria for Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) Among Children
Type de document :	Texte imprimé et/ou numérique
Auteurs :	C. E. RICE, Auteur ; L. A. CARPENTER, Auteur ; M. J. MORRIER, Auteur ; C. LORD, Auteur ; M. DIRIENZO, Auteur ; A. BOAN, Auteur ; C. SKOWYRA, Auteur ; A. FUSCO, Auteur ; J. BAIO, Auteur ; A. ESLER, Auteur ; Walter ZAHORODNY, Auteur ; N. HOBSON, Auteur ; A. MARS, Auteur ; A. THURM, Auteur ; S. BISHOP, Auteur ; Lisa D. WIGGINS, Auteur
Année de publication :	2022
Article en page(s) :	p.5308-5320
Langues :	Anglais (eng)
Mots-clés :	Child  Humans  Autism Spectrum Disorder/diagnosis/epidemiology  Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders  Population Surveillance  Prevalence  Reproducibility of Results  Patient Selection  Autism  Autism spectrum disorder  Classification  Clinician reliability  Dsm-5  Diagnosis  from Western Psychological Services. The findings and conclusions in this report  are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of CDC, NIH,  or Autism Speaks.
Index. décimale :	PER Périodiques
Résumé :	This paper describes a process to define a comprehensive list of exemplars for seven core Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM) diagnostic criteria for autism spectrum disorder (ASD), and report on interrater reliability in applying these exemplars to determine ASD case classification. Clinicians completed an iterative process to map specific exemplars from the CDC Autism and Developmental Disabilities Monitoring (ADDM) Network criteria for ASD surveillance, DSM-5 text, and diagnostic assessments to each of the core DSM-5 ASD criteria. Clinicians applied the diagnostic exemplars to child behavioral descriptions in existing evaluation records to establish initial reliability standards and then for blinded clinician review in one site (phase 1) and for two ADDM Network surveillance years (phase 2). Interrater reliability for each of the DSM-5 diagnostic categories and overall ASD classification was high (defined as very good .60-.79 to excellent ⥠.80 Kappa values) across sex, race/ethnicity, and cognitive levels for both phases. Classification of DSM-5 ASD by mapping specific exemplars from evaluation records by a diverse group of clinician raters is feasible and reliable. This framework provides confidence in the consistency of prevalence classifications of ASD and may be further applied to improve consistency of ASD diagnoses in clinical settings.
En ligne :	http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10803-021-05377-y
Permalink :	https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=489

[article] Defining in Detail and Evaluating Reliability of DSM-5 Criteria for Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) Among Children [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / C. E. RICE, Auteur ; L. A. CARPENTER, Auteur ; M. J. MORRIER, Auteur ; C. LORD, Auteur ; M. DIRIENZO, Auteur ; A. BOAN, Auteur ; C. SKOWYRA, Auteur ; A. FUSCO, Auteur ; J. BAIO, Auteur ; A. ESLER, Auteur ; Walter ZAHORODNY, Auteur ; N. HOBSON, Auteur ; A. MARS, Auteur ; A. THURM, Auteur ; S. BISHOP, Auteur ; Lisa D. WIGGINS, Auteur . - 2022 . - p.5308-5320.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders > 52-12 (December 2022) . - p.5308-5320

Mots-clés :	Child  Humans  Autism Spectrum Disorder/diagnosis/epidemiology  Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders  Population Surveillance  Prevalence  Reproducibility of Results  Patient Selection  Autism  Autism spectrum disorder  Classification  Clinician reliability  Dsm-5  Diagnosis  from Western Psychological Services. The findings and conclusions in this report  are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of CDC, NIH,  or Autism Speaks.
Index. décimale :	PER Périodiques
Résumé :	This paper describes a process to define a comprehensive list of exemplars for seven core Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM) diagnostic criteria for autism spectrum disorder (ASD), and report on interrater reliability in applying these exemplars to determine ASD case classification. Clinicians completed an iterative process to map specific exemplars from the CDC Autism and Developmental Disabilities Monitoring (ADDM) Network criteria for ASD surveillance, DSM-5 text, and diagnostic assessments to each of the core DSM-5 ASD criteria. Clinicians applied the diagnostic exemplars to child behavioral descriptions in existing evaluation records to establish initial reliability standards and then for blinded clinician review in one site (phase 1) and for two ADDM Network surveillance years (phase 2). Interrater reliability for each of the DSM-5 diagnostic categories and overall ASD classification was high (defined as very good .60-.79 to excellent ⥠.80 Kappa values) across sex, race/ethnicity, and cognitive levels for both phases. Classification of DSM-5 ASD by mapping specific exemplars from evaluation records by a diverse group of clinician raters is feasible and reliable. This framework provides confidence in the consistency of prevalence classifications of ASD and may be further applied to improve consistency of ASD diagnoses in clinical settings.
En ligne :	http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10803-021-05377-y
Permalink :	https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=489