Special Editorial: Open science and the Journal of Child Psychology & Psychiatry - next steps? / J. ASARNOW in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 59-7 (July 2018)  

Public ISBD [article]  inJournal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 59-7 (July 2018) . - p.826-827 Titre : Special Editorial: Open science and the Journal of Child Psychology & Psychiatry - next steps? Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : J. ASARNOW, Auteur ; Michael H. BLOCH, Auteur ; Daniel BRANDEIS, Auteur ; S. Alexandra BURT, Auteur ; P. FEARON, Auteur ; E. FOMBONNE, Auteur ; J. GREEN, Auteur ; A. GREGORY, Auteur ; M. GUNNAR, Auteur ; J. M. HALPERIN, Auteur ; C. HOLLIS, Auteur ; Sara JAFFEE, Auteur ; K. KLUMP, Auteur ; S. LANDAU, Auteur ; K. P. LESCH, Auteur ; A. J. T. OLDEHINKEL, Auteur ; B. PETERSON, Auteur ; P. RAMCHANDANI, Auteur ; Edmund J. S. SONUGA-BARKE, Auteur ; A. STRINGARIS, Auteur ; C. H. ZEANAH, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.826-827 Langues : Anglais (eng) Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : The JCPP works at the cutting edge of clinical science to publish ground-breaking research across the full range of topics in the field of child psychology and psychiatry. As JCPP editors, who are also active researchers in our own right, we are conscious of the threat posed to our field by what has come to be known as the reproducibility crisis - the fact that many published findings, initially trumpeted as important developments in the field, cannot be replicated and are therefore likely to be spurious (Nature Human Behaviour, 1, 2017, 21). The JCPP is conscious of its responsibility to play its part in addressing this issue as best it can. The roots of the problem are complex and its causes multifaceted. As one part of its response, the JCPP embraces the principles of open science and encourage preregistration of study protocols. Furthermore, we are working towards implementing new systems to promote preregistration with the hope of increasing scientific transparency and accountability and reducing the risks of selective reporting and posthoc rationalisation of findings (Journal of Child Psychology & Psychiatry, 59, 2018, 1). En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12929 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=368 [article] Special Editorial: Open science and the Journal of Child Psychology & Psychiatry - next steps? [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / J. ASARNOW, Auteur ; Michael H. BLOCH, Auteur ; Daniel BRANDEIS, Auteur ; S. Alexandra BURT, Auteur ; P. FEARON, Auteur ; E. FOMBONNE, Auteur ; J. GREEN, Auteur ; A. GREGORY, Auteur ; M. GUNNAR, Auteur ; J. M. HALPERIN, Auteur ; C. HOLLIS, Auteur ; Sara JAFFEE, Auteur ; K. KLUMP, Auteur ; S. LANDAU, Auteur ; K. P. LESCH, Auteur ; A. J. T. OLDEHINKEL, Auteur ; B. PETERSON, Auteur ; P. RAMCHANDANI, Auteur ; Edmund J. S. SONUGA-BARKE, Auteur ; A. STRINGARIS, Auteur ; C. H. ZEANAH, Auteur . - p.826-827. Langues : Anglais (eng) in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 59-7 (July 2018) . - p.826-827 Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : The JCPP works at the cutting edge of clinical science to publish ground-breaking research across the full range of topics in the field of child psychology and psychiatry. As JCPP editors, who are also active researchers in our own right, we are conscious of the threat posed to our field by what has come to be known as the reproducibility crisis - the fact that many published findings, initially trumpeted as important developments in the field, cannot be replicated and are therefore likely to be spurious (Nature Human Behaviour, 1, 2017, 21). The JCPP is conscious of its responsibility to play its part in addressing this issue as best it can. The roots of the problem are complex and its causes multifaceted. As one part of its response, the JCPP embraces the principles of open science and encourage preregistration of study protocols. Furthermore, we are working towards implementing new systems to promote preregistration with the hope of increasing scientific transparency and accountability and reducing the risks of selective reporting and posthoc rationalisation of findings (Journal of Child Psychology & Psychiatry, 59, 2018, 1). En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12929 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=368

The impact of a computerised test of attention and activity (QbTest) on diagnostic decision-making in children and young people with suspected attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: single-blind randomised controlled trial / C. HOLLIS in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 59-12 (December 2018)  

Public ISBD [article]  inJournal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 59-12 (December 2018) . - p.1298-1308 Titre : The impact of a computerised test of attention and activity (QbTest) on diagnostic decision-making in children and young people with suspected attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: single-blind randomised controlled trial Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : C. HOLLIS, Auteur ; C. L. HALL, Auteur ; B. GUO, Auteur ; M. JAMES, Auteur ; J. BOADU, Auteur ; M. J. GROOM, Auteur ; N. BROWN, Auteur ; C. KAYLOR-HUGHES, Auteur ; M. MOLDAVSKY, Auteur ; A. Z. VALENTINE, Auteur ; G. M. WALKER, Auteur ; D. DALEY, Auteur ; K. SAYAL, Auteur ; R. MORRISS, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.1298-1308 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : QbTest  assessment  attention deficit hyperactivity disorder  continuous performance test Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : BACKGROUND: Diagnosis of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) relies on subjective methods which can lead to diagnostic uncertainty and delay. This trial evaluated the impact of providing a computerised test of attention and activity (QbTest) report on the speed and accuracy of diagnostic decision-making in children with suspected ADHD. METHODS: Randomised, parallel, single-blind controlled trial in mental health and community paediatric clinics in England. Participants were 6-17 years-old and referred for ADHD diagnostic assessment; all underwent assessment-as-usual, plus QbTest. Participants and their clinician were randomised to either receive the QbTest report immediately (QbOpen group) or the report was withheld (QbBlind group). The primary outcome was number of consultations until a diagnostic decision confirming/excluding ADHD within 6-months from baseline. Health economic cost-effectiveness and cost utility analysis was conducted. Assessing QbTest Utility in ADHD: A Randomised Controlled Trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02209116). RESULTS: One hundred and thirty-two participants were randomised to QbOpen group (123 analysed) and 135 to QbBlind group (127 analysed). Clinicians with access to the QbTest report (QbOpen) were more likely to reach a diagnostic decision about ADHD (hazard ratio 1.44, 95% CI 1.04-2.01). At 6-months, 76% of those with a QbTest report had received a diagnostic decision, compared with 50% without. QbTest reduced appointment length by 15% (time ratio 0.85, 95% CI 0.77-0.93), increased clinicians' confidence in their diagnostic decisions (odds ratio 1.77, 95% CI 1.09-2.89) and doubled the likelihood of excluding ADHD. There was no difference in diagnostic accuracy. Health economic analysis showed a position of strict dominance; however, cost savings were small suggesting that the impact of providing the QbTest report within this trial can best be viewed as 'cost neutral'. CONCLUSIONS: QbTest may increase the efficiency of ADHD assessment pathway allowing greater patient throughput with clinicians reaching diagnostic decisions faster without compromising diagnostic accuracy. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12921 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=371 [article] The impact of a computerised test of attention and activity (QbTest) on diagnostic decision-making in children and young people with suspected attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: single-blind randomised controlled trial [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / C. HOLLIS, Auteur ; C. L. HALL, Auteur ; B. GUO, Auteur ; M. JAMES, Auteur ; J. BOADU, Auteur ; M. J. GROOM, Auteur ; N. BROWN, Auteur ; C. KAYLOR-HUGHES, Auteur ; M. MOLDAVSKY, Auteur ; A. Z. VALENTINE, Auteur ; G. M. WALKER, Auteur ; D. DALEY, Auteur ; K. SAYAL, Auteur ; R. MORRISS, Auteur . - p.1298-1308. Langues : Anglais (eng) in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 59-12 (December 2018) . - p.1298-1308 Mots-clés : QbTest  assessment  attention deficit hyperactivity disorder  continuous performance test Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : BACKGROUND: Diagnosis of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) relies on subjective methods which can lead to diagnostic uncertainty and delay. This trial evaluated the impact of providing a computerised test of attention and activity (QbTest) report on the speed and accuracy of diagnostic decision-making in children with suspected ADHD. METHODS: Randomised, parallel, single-blind controlled trial in mental health and community paediatric clinics in England. Participants were 6-17 years-old and referred for ADHD diagnostic assessment; all underwent assessment-as-usual, plus QbTest. Participants and their clinician were randomised to either receive the QbTest report immediately (QbOpen group) or the report was withheld (QbBlind group). The primary outcome was number of consultations until a diagnostic decision confirming/excluding ADHD within 6-months from baseline. Health economic cost-effectiveness and cost utility analysis was conducted. Assessing QbTest Utility in ADHD: A Randomised Controlled Trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02209116). RESULTS: One hundred and thirty-two participants were randomised to QbOpen group (123 analysed) and 135 to QbBlind group (127 analysed). Clinicians with access to the QbTest report (QbOpen) were more likely to reach a diagnostic decision about ADHD (hazard ratio 1.44, 95% CI 1.04-2.01). At 6-months, 76% of those with a QbTest report had received a diagnostic decision, compared with 50% without. QbTest reduced appointment length by 15% (time ratio 0.85, 95% CI 0.77-0.93), increased clinicians' confidence in their diagnostic decisions (odds ratio 1.77, 95% CI 1.09-2.89) and doubled the likelihood of excluding ADHD. There was no difference in diagnostic accuracy. Health economic analysis showed a position of strict dominance; however, cost savings were small suggesting that the impact of providing the QbTest report within this trial can best be viewed as 'cost neutral'. CONCLUSIONS: QbTest may increase the efficiency of ADHD assessment pathway allowing greater patient throughput with clinicians reaching diagnostic decisions faster without compromising diagnostic accuracy. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12921 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=371

What is the Effect of Stimulus Complexity on Attention to Repeating and Changing Information in Autism? / I. ARORA in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 52-2 (February 2022)  

Public ISBD [article]  inJournal of Autism and Developmental Disorders > 52-2 (February 2022) . - p.600-616 Titre : What is the Effect of Stimulus Complexity on Attention to Repeating and Changing Information in Autism? Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : I. ARORA, Auteur ; A. BELLATO, Auteur ; T. GLIGA, Auteur ; D. ROPAR, Auteur ; P. KOCHHAR, Auteur ; C. HOLLIS, Auteur ; M. GROOM, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.600-616 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Adolescent  Attentional Bias  Autism Spectrum Disorder  Autistic Disorder  Child  Humans  Autism  Autistic traits  Eye-tracking  Habituation  Information foraging Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Slower habituation to repeating stimuli characterises Autism, but it is not known whether this is driven by difficulties with information processing or an attentional bias towards sameness. We conducted eye-tracking and presented looming geometrical shapes, clocks with moving arms and smiling faces, as two separate streams of stimuli (one repeating and one changing), to 7-15 years old children and adolescents (n = 103) with Autism, ADHD or co-occurring Autism+ADHD, and neurotypical children (Study-1); and to neurotypical children (n = 64) with varying levels of autistic traits (Study-2). Across both studies, autistic features were associated with longer looks to the repeating stimulus, and shorter looks to the changing stimulus, but only for more complex stimuli, indicating greater difficulty in processing complex or unpredictable information. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10803-021-04961-6 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=455 [article] What is the Effect of Stimulus Complexity on Attention to Repeating and Changing Information in Autism? [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / I. ARORA, Auteur ; A. BELLATO, Auteur ; T. GLIGA, Auteur ; D. ROPAR, Auteur ; P. KOCHHAR, Auteur ; C. HOLLIS, Auteur ; M. GROOM, Auteur . - p.600-616. Langues : Anglais (eng) in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders > 52-2 (February 2022) . - p.600-616 Mots-clés : Adolescent  Attentional Bias  Autism Spectrum Disorder  Autistic Disorder  Child  Humans  Autism  Autistic traits  Eye-tracking  Habituation  Information foraging Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Slower habituation to repeating stimuli characterises Autism, but it is not known whether this is driven by difficulties with information processing or an attentional bias towards sameness. We conducted eye-tracking and presented looming geometrical shapes, clocks with moving arms and smiling faces, as two separate streams of stimuli (one repeating and one changing), to 7-15 years old children and adolescents (n = 103) with Autism, ADHD or co-occurring Autism+ADHD, and neurotypical children (Study-1); and to neurotypical children (n = 64) with varying levels of autistic traits (Study-2). Across both studies, autistic features were associated with longer looks to the repeating stimulus, and shorter looks to the changing stimulus, but only for more complex stimuli, indicating greater difficulty in processing complex or unpredictable information. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10803-021-04961-6 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=455

---

1 (1 - 3 / 3)