Autistic and non-autistic prosocial decision-making: The impact of recipient neurotype / Peter RUSH in Research in Autism, 128 (October 2025)  

Public ISBD [article]  inResearch in Autism > 128 (October 2025) . - p.202710 Titre : Autistic and non-autistic prosocial decision-making: The impact of recipient neurotype Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Peter RUSH, Auteur ; Connor T. KEATING, Auteur ; Selma LUGTMEIJER, Auteur ; Evie ALLMARK, Auteur ; Anna DAVIS, Auteur ; Aradhna BEEJADHUR, Auteur ; Amy TARLING, Auteur ; Samuel HANNON, Auteur ; Kelan TODD, Auteur ; Alexander IDDLES, Auteur ; Chaitrali VICHARE, Auteur ; Michael J. M. GACHOMBA, Auteur ; Patricia L. LOCKWOOD, Auteur ; Matthew APPS, Auteur ; Sophie SOWDEN-CARVALHO, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.202710 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Autism  Adults  Prosocial behaviour  Decision-making  Neurotype-matching Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : A body of research suggests cross-neurotype interpersonal interactions may be more challenging, and non-autistic individuals show less interest in interacting with their autistic peers. However, it is not clear whether such cross-neurotype differences extend to prosocial decision-making behaviour – something that is vital for forming and maintaining social bonds. Using a physical-effort-based decision-making paradigm, in combination with computational modelling, we examined 30 autistic and 30 non-autistic individuals’ prosocial willingness to exert physical effort for oneself and others, as a function of whether the beneficiary shares their neurotype or not. We compared decisions to exert effort and action energisation when participants made decisions for the Self, Other Same neurotype and Other Different neurotype. Results showed a robust self-bias in effort discounting, with both groups choosing to exert more effort for themselves than others, and no differences between same and different neurotype others. However, while non-autistic participants showed no difference in action energisation between the same and different neurotype others, autistic participants exerted significantly more force for others of the same neurotype. Implicit, but not explicit, biases held about autism played a role: in autistic participants, higher implicit autism stigma predicted differences in effort discounting between same and different neurotype others, while in non-autistic participants, implicit bias predicted differences in actual effort exerted rather than decision-making. This work has important implications for understanding how interactor neurotypes and autism-specific biases may feed into prosocial decision-making contexts such as employment, health and education settings, where autistic individuals face the everyday consideration of whether to disclose their diagnostic status. En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reia.2025.202710 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=570 [article] Autistic and non-autistic prosocial decision-making: The impact of recipient neurotype [texte imprimé] / Peter RUSH, Auteur ; Connor T. KEATING, Auteur ; Selma LUGTMEIJER, Auteur ; Evie ALLMARK, Auteur ; Anna DAVIS, Auteur ; Aradhna BEEJADHUR, Auteur ; Amy TARLING, Auteur ; Samuel HANNON, Auteur ; Kelan TODD, Auteur ; Alexander IDDLES, Auteur ; Chaitrali VICHARE, Auteur ; Michael J. M. GACHOMBA, Auteur ; Patricia L. LOCKWOOD, Auteur ; Matthew APPS, Auteur ; Sophie SOWDEN-CARVALHO, Auteur . - p.202710. Langues : Anglais (eng) in Research in Autism > 128 (October 2025) . - p.202710 Mots-clés : Autism  Adults  Prosocial behaviour  Decision-making  Neurotype-matching Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : A body of research suggests cross-neurotype interpersonal interactions may be more challenging, and non-autistic individuals show less interest in interacting with their autistic peers. However, it is not clear whether such cross-neurotype differences extend to prosocial decision-making behaviour – something that is vital for forming and maintaining social bonds. Using a physical-effort-based decision-making paradigm, in combination with computational modelling, we examined 30 autistic and 30 non-autistic individuals’ prosocial willingness to exert physical effort for oneself and others, as a function of whether the beneficiary shares their neurotype or not. We compared decisions to exert effort and action energisation when participants made decisions for the Self, Other Same neurotype and Other Different neurotype. Results showed a robust self-bias in effort discounting, with both groups choosing to exert more effort for themselves than others, and no differences between same and different neurotype others. However, while non-autistic participants showed no difference in action energisation between the same and different neurotype others, autistic participants exerted significantly more force for others of the same neurotype. Implicit, but not explicit, biases held about autism played a role: in autistic participants, higher implicit autism stigma predicted differences in effort discounting between same and different neurotype others, while in non-autistic participants, implicit bias predicted differences in actual effort exerted rather than decision-making. This work has important implications for understanding how interactor neurotypes and autism-specific biases may feed into prosocial decision-making contexts such as employment, health and education settings, where autistic individuals face the everyday consideration of whether to disclose their diagnostic status. En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reia.2025.202710 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=570

A systematic review and meta-analysis of mental health outcomes associated with camouflaging in autistic people / Valeria KHUDIAKOVA in Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 118 (October 2024)  

Public ISBD [article]  inResearch in Autism Spectrum Disorders > 118 (October 2024) . - 102492 Titre : A systematic review and meta-analysis of mental health outcomes associated with camouflaging in autistic people Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Valeria KHUDIAKOVA, Auteur ; Emmeline RUSSELL, Auteur ; Sophie SOWDEN-CARVALHO, Auteur ; Andrew D. R. SURTEES, Auteur Article en page(s) : 102492 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Autism  Camouflaging  Mental health  Anxiety  Depression  Wellbeing Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Background This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the strength and quality of the evidence for the relationship between camouflaging and its potential outcomes in autistic people. With the worryingly high proportions of autistic people experiencing mental illness and suicidality, it is important to understand whether camouflaging is a risk factor in that population. Methods Searches of five databases (Web of Science, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Embase, ProQuest Dissertations & Theses) yielded 16 studies eligible for a meta-analysis using correlations and six additional studies eligible for a narrative review, with 5897 autistic participants in total. Risk of bias was assessed for all studies using a bespoke tool. Based on the 16 studies eligible for the meta-analysis, we computed meta-correlations between camouflaging and anxiety, depression, social anxiety, and psychological wellbeing, using a random-effects model. Meta-regressions examined if study effect sizes were moderated by study quality, participants' mean age, and proportions of female and clinically diagnosed participants. Results We found significant moderate positive relationships between camouflaging and anxiety/generalised anxiety, depression, and social anxiety and a significant small negative relationship between camouflaging and mental wellbeing. There was no significant moderating effect of the aforementioned variables on study effect sizes. Discussion All of the studies were underpowered to detect small effects, and many used insufficiently validated measures. The established link between camouflaging and mental health difficulties is discussed with reference to future research and clinical practice. Longitudinal studies should also aim to establish causality. Other There was no funding associated with this review. The researchers have no conflicts of interest to disclose. The review was preregistered on PROSPERO (registration number: CRD42023473077). En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2024.102492 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=540 [article] A systematic review and meta-analysis of mental health outcomes associated with camouflaging in autistic people [texte imprimé] / Valeria KHUDIAKOVA, Auteur ; Emmeline RUSSELL, Auteur ; Sophie SOWDEN-CARVALHO, Auteur ; Andrew D. R. SURTEES, Auteur . - 102492. Langues : Anglais (eng) in Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders > 118 (October 2024) . - 102492 Mots-clés : Autism  Camouflaging  Mental health  Anxiety  Depression  Wellbeing Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Background This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the strength and quality of the evidence for the relationship between camouflaging and its potential outcomes in autistic people. With the worryingly high proportions of autistic people experiencing mental illness and suicidality, it is important to understand whether camouflaging is a risk factor in that population. Methods Searches of five databases (Web of Science, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Embase, ProQuest Dissertations & Theses) yielded 16 studies eligible for a meta-analysis using correlations and six additional studies eligible for a narrative review, with 5897 autistic participants in total. Risk of bias was assessed for all studies using a bespoke tool. Based on the 16 studies eligible for the meta-analysis, we computed meta-correlations between camouflaging and anxiety, depression, social anxiety, and psychological wellbeing, using a random-effects model. Meta-regressions examined if study effect sizes were moderated by study quality, participants' mean age, and proportions of female and clinically diagnosed participants. Results We found significant moderate positive relationships between camouflaging and anxiety/generalised anxiety, depression, and social anxiety and a significant small negative relationship between camouflaging and mental wellbeing. There was no significant moderating effect of the aforementioned variables on study effect sizes. Discussion All of the studies were underpowered to detect small effects, and many used insufficiently validated measures. The established link between camouflaging and mental health difficulties is discussed with reference to future research and clinical practice. Longitudinal studies should also aim to establish causality. Other There was no funding associated with this review. The researchers have no conflicts of interest to disclose. The review was preregistered on PROSPERO (registration number: CRD42023473077). En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2024.102492 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=540

---

1 (1 - 2 / 2) Par page : 25 50 100 200