Research Review: Why do prospective and retrospective measures of maltreatment differ? A narrative review / Oonagh COLEMAN in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 65-12 (December 2024)  

Public ISBD [article]  inJournal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 65-12 (December 2024) . - p.1662-1677 Titre : Research Review: Why do prospective and retrospective measures of maltreatment differ? A narrative review Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Oonagh COLEMAN, Auteur ; Jessie R. BALDWIN, Auteur ; Tim DALGLEISH, Auteur ; Kelly ROSE-CLARKE, Auteur ; Cathy Spatz WIDOM, Auteur ; Andrea DANESE, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.1662-1677 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Childhood maltreatment  childhood trauma  child abuse  neglect  memory  psychopathology Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Background Childhood maltreatment contributes to a large mental health burden worldwide. Different measures of childhood maltreatment are not equivalent and may capture meaningful differences. In particular, prospective and retrospective measures of maltreatment identify different groups of individuals and are differentially associated with psychopathology. However, the reasons behind these discrepancies have not yet been comprehensively mapped. Methods In this review, we draw on multi-disciplinary research and present an integrated framework to explain maltreatment measurement disagreement. Results We identified three interrelated domains. First, methodological issues related to measurement and data collection methods. Second, the role of memory in influencing retrospective reports of maltreatment. Finally, the motivations individuals may have to disclose, withhold, or fabricate information about maltreatment. Conclusions A greater understanding of maltreatment measurement disagreement may point to new ways to conceptualise and assess maltreatment. Furthermore, it may help uncover mechanisms underlying maltreatment-related psychopathology and targets for novel interventions. En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.14048 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=543 [article] Research Review: Why do prospective and retrospective measures of maltreatment differ? A narrative review [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Oonagh COLEMAN, Auteur ; Jessie R. BALDWIN, Auteur ; Tim DALGLEISH, Auteur ; Kelly ROSE-CLARKE, Auteur ; Cathy Spatz WIDOM, Auteur ; Andrea DANESE, Auteur . - p.1662-1677. Langues : Anglais (eng) in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 65-12 (December 2024) . - p.1662-1677 Mots-clés : Childhood maltreatment  childhood trauma  child abuse  neglect  memory  psychopathology Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Background Childhood maltreatment contributes to a large mental health burden worldwide. Different measures of childhood maltreatment are not equivalent and may capture meaningful differences. In particular, prospective and retrospective measures of maltreatment identify different groups of individuals and are differentially associated with psychopathology. However, the reasons behind these discrepancies have not yet been comprehensively mapped. Methods In this review, we draw on multi-disciplinary research and present an integrated framework to explain maltreatment measurement disagreement. Results We identified three interrelated domains. First, methodological issues related to measurement and data collection methods. Second, the role of memory in influencing retrospective reports of maltreatment. Finally, the motivations individuals may have to disclose, withhold, or fabricate information about maltreatment. Conclusions A greater understanding of maltreatment measurement disagreement may point to new ways to conceptualise and assess maltreatment. Furthermore, it may help uncover mechanisms underlying maltreatment-related psychopathology and targets for novel interventions. En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.14048 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=543

---

1 (1 - 1 / 1)