Centre d'Information et de documentation du CRA Rhône-Alpes
CRA
Informations pratiques
-
Adresse
Centre d'information et de documentation
du CRA Rhône-Alpes
Centre Hospitalier le Vinatier
bât 211
95, Bd Pinel
69678 Bron CedexHoraires
Lundi au Vendredi
9h00-12h00 13h30-16h00Contact
Tél: +33(0)4 37 91 54 65
Mail
Fax: +33(0)4 37 91 54 37
-
Résultat de la recherche
2 recherche sur le mot-clé 'Theoretical framework'
Affiner la recherche Générer le flux rss de la recherche
Partager le résultat de cette recherche Faire une suggestion
Conceptualising paranoia in ASD: A systematic review and development of a theoretical framework / Debbie SPAIN in Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 25 (May 2016)
[article]
Titre : Conceptualising paranoia in ASD: A systematic review and development of a theoretical framework Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Debbie SPAIN, Auteur ; Jacqueline SIN, Auteur ; Daniel FREEMAN, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.97-111 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Autism spectrum disorder Asperger syndrome Paranoia Systematic review Theoretical framework Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Paranoia, unfounded ideation that others deliberately intend harm, has predominately been studied in schizophrenia. Increasingly, it is recognised that there is a spectrum of severity of excessive mistrust across the general population. Relatively little is known about paranoia in individuals with autism spectrum disorders (ASD), but rates could be expected to be higher given both difficulties in understanding others’ mental states and frequent experiences of negative social interactions. A systematic search of English-language peer-reviewed publications was undertaken to synthesise empirical research about paranoia in ASD. Seven studies, comprising a total of 180 ASD participants, met the inclusion criteria. All the studies were cross-sectional, thereby limiting causal interpretations. Individuals with ASD were consistently found to have higher levels of paranoia compared to non-clinical controls, and lower levels than individuals with current psychotic experiences manifesting in the context of schizophrenia. Furthermore, the initial evidence indicates that paranoia in ASD may be linked with theory of mind performance, negative affect, and jumping to conclusions, but not to attributional style. As in typically-developing populations, causal and maintaining mechanisms for paranoia in ASD, against a background of genetic and environmental risk, most likely include cognitive and affective processes interacting with social factors. We hypothesise, however, that core ASD characteristics and associated neurocognitive impairments also serve to precipitate and perpetuate paranoia. A framework to guide further investigation is outlined. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2016.02.002 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=285
in Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders > 25 (May 2016) . - p.97-111[article] Conceptualising paranoia in ASD: A systematic review and development of a theoretical framework [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Debbie SPAIN, Auteur ; Jacqueline SIN, Auteur ; Daniel FREEMAN, Auteur . - p.97-111.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders > 25 (May 2016) . - p.97-111
Mots-clés : Autism spectrum disorder Asperger syndrome Paranoia Systematic review Theoretical framework Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Paranoia, unfounded ideation that others deliberately intend harm, has predominately been studied in schizophrenia. Increasingly, it is recognised that there is a spectrum of severity of excessive mistrust across the general population. Relatively little is known about paranoia in individuals with autism spectrum disorders (ASD), but rates could be expected to be higher given both difficulties in understanding others’ mental states and frequent experiences of negative social interactions. A systematic search of English-language peer-reviewed publications was undertaken to synthesise empirical research about paranoia in ASD. Seven studies, comprising a total of 180 ASD participants, met the inclusion criteria. All the studies were cross-sectional, thereby limiting causal interpretations. Individuals with ASD were consistently found to have higher levels of paranoia compared to non-clinical controls, and lower levels than individuals with current psychotic experiences manifesting in the context of schizophrenia. Furthermore, the initial evidence indicates that paranoia in ASD may be linked with theory of mind performance, negative affect, and jumping to conclusions, but not to attributional style. As in typically-developing populations, causal and maintaining mechanisms for paranoia in ASD, against a background of genetic and environmental risk, most likely include cognitive and affective processes interacting with social factors. We hypothesise, however, that core ASD characteristics and associated neurocognitive impairments also serve to precipitate and perpetuate paranoia. A framework to guide further investigation is outlined. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2016.02.002 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=285 Systematic Review of the Relationship Between Autism Stigma and Informal Caregiver Mental Health / C. PAPADOPOULOS in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 49-4 (April 2019)
[article]
Titre : Systematic Review of the Relationship Between Autism Stigma and Informal Caregiver Mental Health Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : C. PAPADOPOULOS, Auteur ; A. LODDER, Auteur ; G. CONSTANTINOU, Auteur ; G. RANDHAWA, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.1665-1685 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Autism Caregiver Carer Mental health Stigma Theoretical framework Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Families play a crucial role in determining the mental health of the autistic individual(s) they are caring for. However, the stigma associated with autism can impair caregiver health. To investigate this, empirical evidence pertaining to stigma's impact on informal caregivers' mental health was systematically reviewed. All twelve included studies (n = 1442 informal caregivers) consistently reported the impact of autism related stigma upon caregiver mental health to be significant, meaningful and complex. A new theoretical framework describing the relationship between stigma and caregiver mental health is constructed. Moderating variables include those both changeable through intervention (e.g. hopelessness, self-esteem, self-compassion) and not changeable (gender, culture, financial burden and time since diagnosis). Implications and recommendations for professionals, interventions and future research are proposed. En ligne : https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10803-018-3835-z Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=388
in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders > 49-4 (April 2019) . - p.1665-1685[article] Systematic Review of the Relationship Between Autism Stigma and Informal Caregiver Mental Health [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / C. PAPADOPOULOS, Auteur ; A. LODDER, Auteur ; G. CONSTANTINOU, Auteur ; G. RANDHAWA, Auteur . - p.1665-1685.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders > 49-4 (April 2019) . - p.1665-1685
Mots-clés : Autism Caregiver Carer Mental health Stigma Theoretical framework Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Families play a crucial role in determining the mental health of the autistic individual(s) they are caring for. However, the stigma associated with autism can impair caregiver health. To investigate this, empirical evidence pertaining to stigma's impact on informal caregivers' mental health was systematically reviewed. All twelve included studies (n = 1442 informal caregivers) consistently reported the impact of autism related stigma upon caregiver mental health to be significant, meaningful and complex. A new theoretical framework describing the relationship between stigma and caregiver mental health is constructed. Moderating variables include those both changeable through intervention (e.g. hopelessness, self-esteem, self-compassion) and not changeable (gender, culture, financial burden and time since diagnosis). Implications and recommendations for professionals, interventions and future research are proposed. En ligne : https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10803-018-3835-z Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=388