- <Centre d'Information et de documentation du CRA Rhône-Alpes
- CRA
- Informations pratiques
-
Adresse
Centre d'information et de documentation
Horaires
du CRA Rhône-Alpes
Centre Hospitalier le Vinatier
bât 211
95, Bd Pinel
69678 Bron CedexLundi au Vendredi
Contact
9h00-12h00 13h30-16h00Tél: +33(0)4 37 91 54 65
Mail
Fax: +33(0)4 37 91 54 37
-
Adresse
Résultat de la recherche
2 recherche sur le mot-clé 'cognitive functions'
Affiner la recherche Générer le flux rss de la recherche
Partager le résultat de cette recherche Faire une suggestion
Editorial: Research Domain Criteria (RDoC): a new psychiatric nosology whose time has not yet come / Bradley S. PETERSON in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 56-7 (July 2015)
[article]
Titre : Editorial: Research Domain Criteria (RDoC): a new psychiatric nosology whose time has not yet come Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Bradley S. PETERSON, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.719-722 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Nosology Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM) neural systems behavioural cognitive functions developmental trajectories Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : In developing new ways of classifying mental disorders, RDoC is developing a new nosology, a new way of dividing nature at its seams. Given the NIMH influence on research agendas across the world, this scientific agenda will have important consequences for researchers and clinicians worldwide. Defining discrete neural systems and the behavioral and cognitive functions they subserve is scientifically important. Understanding how these systems relate to clinical problems, patient suffering, and improved treatments has immense potential practical value for clinical care worldwide. This Editorial places the RDoC framework in context and then sets out a series of conceptual, empirical, and developmental challenges for RDoC. Together these challenges suggest that RDoC is premature as a nosology and, as currently implemented, risks being reified and overly rigid in its application. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12439 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=260
in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 56-7 (July 2015) . - p.719-722[article] Editorial: Research Domain Criteria (RDoC): a new psychiatric nosology whose time has not yet come [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Bradley S. PETERSON, Auteur . - p.719-722.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 56-7 (July 2015) . - p.719-722
Mots-clés : Nosology Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM) neural systems behavioural cognitive functions developmental trajectories Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : In developing new ways of classifying mental disorders, RDoC is developing a new nosology, a new way of dividing nature at its seams. Given the NIMH influence on research agendas across the world, this scientific agenda will have important consequences for researchers and clinicians worldwide. Defining discrete neural systems and the behavioral and cognitive functions they subserve is scientifically important. Understanding how these systems relate to clinical problems, patient suffering, and improved treatments has immense potential practical value for clinical care worldwide. This Editorial places the RDoC framework in context and then sets out a series of conceptual, empirical, and developmental challenges for RDoC. Together these challenges suggest that RDoC is premature as a nosology and, as currently implemented, risks being reified and overly rigid in its application. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12439 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=260 Research Review: Neuropsychological test performance in pediatric obsessive–compulsive disorder – a meta-analysis / Amitai ABRAMOVITCH in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 56-8 (August 2015)
[article]
Titre : Research Review: Neuropsychological test performance in pediatric obsessive–compulsive disorder – a meta-analysis Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Amitai ABRAMOVITCH, Auteur ; Jonathan S. ABRAMOWITZ, Auteur ; Andrew MITTELMAN, Auteur ; Abigail STARK, Auteur ; Kesley RAMSEY, Auteur ; Daniel A. GELLER, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.837-847 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Obsessive–compulsive disorder pediatric neuropsychology meta-analysis executive function developmental cognitive functions Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Background Research into the neuropsychology of pediatric obsessive–compulsive disorder (OCD) reveals inconsistent results, limiting the ability to draw conclusions about possible neurocognitive deficits in youth with OCD. The aim of this study was to conduct a meta-analysis of the available literature. Methods We identified 36 studies, of which 11 studies met inclusion criteria. Results were categorized into nine functional subdomains: planning, response inhibition/interference control, set shifting/cognitive flexibility, verbal memory, nonverbal memory, processing speed, working memory, visuospatial functions, and attention. For each domain, weighted pooled Hedges' g effect size was calculated using random model analyses. Results Small effect sizes were found across all subdomains, none of which were found to be statistically significant. Discussion Results indicate that youth with OCD do not exhibit noteworthy neuropsychological deficits. This is in line with recent suggestions that OCD may not be characterized by clinically meaningful neuropsychological impairments. However, the small number of available controlled studies highlights the urgent need for more neuropsychological research in this population, as well as for further exploration of the neurodevelopmental hypothesis in pediatric OCD. Finally, the relatively low persistence rates of OCD into adulthood should be taken under consideration, especially in the context of the putative neuropsychological performance differences between adult and pediatric OCD populations. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12414 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=263
in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 56-8 (August 2015) . - p.837-847[article] Research Review: Neuropsychological test performance in pediatric obsessive–compulsive disorder – a meta-analysis [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Amitai ABRAMOVITCH, Auteur ; Jonathan S. ABRAMOWITZ, Auteur ; Andrew MITTELMAN, Auteur ; Abigail STARK, Auteur ; Kesley RAMSEY, Auteur ; Daniel A. GELLER, Auteur . - p.837-847.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 56-8 (August 2015) . - p.837-847
Mots-clés : Obsessive–compulsive disorder pediatric neuropsychology meta-analysis executive function developmental cognitive functions Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Background Research into the neuropsychology of pediatric obsessive–compulsive disorder (OCD) reveals inconsistent results, limiting the ability to draw conclusions about possible neurocognitive deficits in youth with OCD. The aim of this study was to conduct a meta-analysis of the available literature. Methods We identified 36 studies, of which 11 studies met inclusion criteria. Results were categorized into nine functional subdomains: planning, response inhibition/interference control, set shifting/cognitive flexibility, verbal memory, nonverbal memory, processing speed, working memory, visuospatial functions, and attention. For each domain, weighted pooled Hedges' g effect size was calculated using random model analyses. Results Small effect sizes were found across all subdomains, none of which were found to be statistically significant. Discussion Results indicate that youth with OCD do not exhibit noteworthy neuropsychological deficits. This is in line with recent suggestions that OCD may not be characterized by clinically meaningful neuropsychological impairments. However, the small number of available controlled studies highlights the urgent need for more neuropsychological research in this population, as well as for further exploration of the neurodevelopmental hypothesis in pediatric OCD. Finally, the relatively low persistence rates of OCD into adulthood should be taken under consideration, especially in the context of the putative neuropsychological performance differences between adult and pediatric OCD populations. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12414 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=263