
- <Centre d'Information et de documentation du CRA Rhône-Alpes
- CRA
- Informations pratiques
-
Adresse
Centre d'information et de documentation
Horaires
du CRA Rhône-Alpes
Centre Hospitalier le Vinatier
bât 211
95, Bd Pinel
69678 Bron CedexLundi au Vendredi
Contact
9h00-12h00 13h30-16h00Tél: +33(0)4 37 91 54 65
Mail
Fax: +33(0)4 37 91 54 37
-
Adresse
Résultat de la recherche
2 recherche sur le mot-clé 'dimensional models'
Visionner les documents numériques
Affiner la recherche Générer le flux rss de la recherche
Partager le résultat de cette recherche
Faire une suggestionMeasuring early life adversity: A dimensional approach / Ilana S. BERMAN in Development and Psychopathology, 34-2 (May 2022)
![]()
[article]
Titre : Measuring early life adversity: A dimensional approach Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Ilana S. BERMAN, Auteur ; Katie A. MCLAUGHLIN, Auteur ; Nim TOTTENHAM, Auteur ; Keith M. GODFREY, Auteur ; Teresa E. SEEMAN, Auteur ; Eric LOUCKS, Auteur ; Stephen J. SUOMI, Auteur ; Andrea DANESE, Auteur ; Margaret A. SHERIDAN, Auteur Article en page(s) : 499-511 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : dimensional models adversity measurement deprivation and threat adverse early experiences ACEs Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Exposure to adversity in childhood is associated with elevations in numerous physical and mental health outcomes across the life course. The biological embedding of early experience during periods of developmental plasticity is one pathway that contributes to these associations. Dimensional models specify mechanistic pathways linking different dimensions of adversity to health and well-being outcomes later in life. While findings from existing studies testing these dimensions have provided promising preliminary support for these models, less agreement exists about how to measure the experiences that comprise each dimension. Here, we review existing approaches to measuring two dimensions of adversity: threat and deprivation. We recommend specific measures for measuring these constructs and, when possible, document when the same measure can be used by different reporters and across the lifespan to maximize the utility with which these recommendations can be applied. Through this approach, we hope to stimulate progress in understanding how particular dimensions of early environmental experience contribute to lifelong health. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0954579421001826 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=474
in Development and Psychopathology > 34-2 (May 2022) . - 499-511[article] Measuring early life adversity: A dimensional approach [texte imprimé] / Ilana S. BERMAN, Auteur ; Katie A. MCLAUGHLIN, Auteur ; Nim TOTTENHAM, Auteur ; Keith M. GODFREY, Auteur ; Teresa E. SEEMAN, Auteur ; Eric LOUCKS, Auteur ; Stephen J. SUOMI, Auteur ; Andrea DANESE, Auteur ; Margaret A. SHERIDAN, Auteur . - 499-511.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Development and Psychopathology > 34-2 (May 2022) . - 499-511
Mots-clés : dimensional models adversity measurement deprivation and threat adverse early experiences ACEs Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Exposure to adversity in childhood is associated with elevations in numerous physical and mental health outcomes across the life course. The biological embedding of early experience during periods of developmental plasticity is one pathway that contributes to these associations. Dimensional models specify mechanistic pathways linking different dimensions of adversity to health and well-being outcomes later in life. While findings from existing studies testing these dimensions have provided promising preliminary support for these models, less agreement exists about how to measure the experiences that comprise each dimension. Here, we review existing approaches to measuring two dimensions of adversity: threat and deprivation. We recommend specific measures for measuring these constructs and, when possible, document when the same measure can be used by different reporters and across the lifespan to maximize the utility with which these recommendations can be applied. Through this approach, we hope to stimulate progress in understanding how particular dimensions of early environmental experience contribute to lifelong health. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0954579421001826 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=474 Research Review: Assessment of early-life adversity and trauma – cumulative risk and dimensional approaches / Laura MACHLIN in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 66-11 (November 2025)
![]()
[article]
Titre : Research Review: Assessment of early-life adversity and trauma – cumulative risk and dimensional approaches Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Laura MACHLIN, Auteur ; Margaret A. SHERIDAN, Auteur ; Angelina Pei-Tzu TSAI, Auteur ; Katie A. MCLAUGHLIN, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.1748-1764 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Early-life adversity assessment cumulative risk dimensional models threat deprivation Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : In this research review, we present approaches and recommendations for assessing early-life adversity and childhood trauma aligned with two leading conceptual models of adversity: cumulative risk and dimensional models. We summarize the measurement implications of each conceptual model and common approaches for assessing early-life adversity in studies utilizing each of these models. We consider other critical components in the assessment of early-life adversity and trauma, including retrospective and prospective reporting, objective and subjective measurement, and caregiver and child reporting. Finally, we briefly summarize the existing interview and questionnaire measures that are widely used to assess early-life adversity and trauma using both cumulative risk and dimensional approaches. This work suggests that there is greater heterogeneity in measures used to assess the dimensional model relative to those used to assess the cumulative risk model, which allows for more flexibility in the assessment of early-life adversity. In addition, we observed that more detailed measures were available to assess experiences of threat compared to experiences of deprivation. Measures that assess adversity experiences in terms of frequency and severity across multiple dimensions of experience within a single measure are needed to facilitate consistent and reliable assessment of early-life adversity and trauma, particularly when applying dimensional models. En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.14170 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=571
in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 66-11 (November 2025) . - p.1748-1764[article] Research Review: Assessment of early-life adversity and trauma – cumulative risk and dimensional approaches [texte imprimé] / Laura MACHLIN, Auteur ; Margaret A. SHERIDAN, Auteur ; Angelina Pei-Tzu TSAI, Auteur ; Katie A. MCLAUGHLIN, Auteur . - p.1748-1764.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 66-11 (November 2025) . - p.1748-1764
Mots-clés : Early-life adversity assessment cumulative risk dimensional models threat deprivation Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : In this research review, we present approaches and recommendations for assessing early-life adversity and childhood trauma aligned with two leading conceptual models of adversity: cumulative risk and dimensional models. We summarize the measurement implications of each conceptual model and common approaches for assessing early-life adversity in studies utilizing each of these models. We consider other critical components in the assessment of early-life adversity and trauma, including retrospective and prospective reporting, objective and subjective measurement, and caregiver and child reporting. Finally, we briefly summarize the existing interview and questionnaire measures that are widely used to assess early-life adversity and trauma using both cumulative risk and dimensional approaches. This work suggests that there is greater heterogeneity in measures used to assess the dimensional model relative to those used to assess the cumulative risk model, which allows for more flexibility in the assessment of early-life adversity. In addition, we observed that more detailed measures were available to assess experiences of threat compared to experiences of deprivation. Measures that assess adversity experiences in terms of frequency and severity across multiple dimensions of experience within a single measure are needed to facilitate consistent and reliable assessment of early-life adversity and trauma, particularly when applying dimensional models. En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.14170 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=571

