Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised (ADI-R) Algorithms for Toddlers and Young Preschoolers: Application in a Non-US Sample of 1,104 Children / Annelies A. DE BILDT in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 45-7 (July 2015)  

Public ISBD [article]  inJournal of Autism and Developmental Disorders > 45-7 (July 2015) . - p.2076-2091 Titre : Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised (ADI-R) Algorithms for Toddlers and Young Preschoolers: Application in a Non-US Sample of 1,104 Children Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Annelies A. DE BILDT, Auteur ; Sjoerd SYTEMA, Auteur ; Eric ZANDER, Auteur ; Sven BÖLTE, Auteur ; Harald STURM, Auteur ; Nurit YIRMIYA, Auteur ; Maya YAARI, Auteur ; Tony CHARMAN, Auteur ; Erica SALOMONE, Auteur ; Ann LECOUTEUR, Auteur ; Jonathan GREEN, Auteur ; Ricardo CANAL-BEDIA, Auteur ; Patricia GARCÍA PRIMO, Auteur ; Emma VAN DAALEN, Auteur ; Maretha V. DE JONGE, Auteur ; Emilía GUÐMUNDSDÓTTIR, Auteur ; Sigurrós JÓHANNSDÓTTIR, Auteur ; Marija RALEVA, Auteur ; Meri BOSKOVSKA, Auteur ; Bernadette ROGE, Auteur ; Sophie BADUEL, Auteur ; Irma MOILANEN, Auteur ; Anneli YLIHERVA, Auteur ; Jan K. BUITELAAR, Auteur ; IrisJ OOSTERLING, Auteur Année de publication : 2015 Article en page(s) : p.2076-2091 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Autism spectrum disorders  Early diagnosis  Assessment Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : The current study aimed to investigate the Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised (ADI-R) algorithms for toddlers and young preschoolers (Kim and Lord, J Autism Dev Disord 42(1):82–93, 2012) in a non-US sample from ten sites in nine countries (n = 1,104). The construct validity indicated a good fit of the algorithms. The diagnostic validity was lower, with satisfactorily high specificities but moderate sensitivities. Young children with clinical ASD and lower language ability were largely in the mild-to-moderate or moderate-to-severe concern ranges of the ADI-R, nearly half of the older and phrase speech ASD-group fell into the little-to-no concern range. Although broadly the findings support the toddler algorithms, further work is required to understand why they might have different properties in different samples to further inform research and clinical use. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10803-015-2372-2 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=261 [article] Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised (ADI-R) Algorithms for Toddlers and Young Preschoolers: Application in a Non-US Sample of 1,104 Children [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Annelies A. DE BILDT, Auteur ; Sjoerd SYTEMA, Auteur ; Eric ZANDER, Auteur ; Sven BÖLTE, Auteur ; Harald STURM, Auteur ; Nurit YIRMIYA, Auteur ; Maya YAARI, Auteur ; Tony CHARMAN, Auteur ; Erica SALOMONE, Auteur ; Ann LECOUTEUR, Auteur ; Jonathan GREEN, Auteur ; Ricardo CANAL-BEDIA, Auteur ; Patricia GARCÍA PRIMO, Auteur ; Emma VAN DAALEN, Auteur ; Maretha V. DE JONGE, Auteur ; Emilía GUÐMUNDSDÓTTIR, Auteur ; Sigurrós JÓHANNSDÓTTIR, Auteur ; Marija RALEVA, Auteur ; Meri BOSKOVSKA, Auteur ; Bernadette ROGE, Auteur ; Sophie BADUEL, Auteur ; Irma MOILANEN, Auteur ; Anneli YLIHERVA, Auteur ; Jan K. BUITELAAR, Auteur ; IrisJ OOSTERLING, Auteur . - 2015 . - p.2076-2091. Langues : Anglais (eng) in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders > 45-7 (July 2015) . - p.2076-2091 Mots-clés : Autism spectrum disorders  Early diagnosis  Assessment Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : The current study aimed to investigate the Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised (ADI-R) algorithms for toddlers and young preschoolers (Kim and Lord, J Autism Dev Disord 42(1):82–93, 2012) in a non-US sample from ten sites in nine countries (n = 1,104). The construct validity indicated a good fit of the algorithms. The diagnostic validity was lower, with satisfactorily high specificities but moderate sensitivities. Young children with clinical ASD and lower language ability were largely in the mild-to-moderate or moderate-to-severe concern ranges of the ADI-R, nearly half of the older and phrase speech ASD-group fell into the little-to-no concern range. Although broadly the findings support the toddler algorithms, further work is required to understand why they might have different properties in different samples to further inform research and clinical use. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10803-015-2372-2 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=261

Changes in Prevalence of Autism Spectrum Disorders in 2001–2011: Findings from the Stockholm Youth Cohort / Selma IDRING in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 45-6 (June 2015)  

Public ISBD [article]  inJournal of Autism and Developmental Disorders > 45-6 (June 2015) . - p.1766-1773 Titre : Changes in Prevalence of Autism Spectrum Disorders in 2001–2011: Findings from the Stockholm Youth Cohort Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Selma IDRING, Auteur ; Michael LUNDBERG, Auteur ; Harald STURM, Auteur ; Christina DALMAN, Auteur ; Clara GUMPERT, Auteur ; Dheeraj RAI, Auteur ; Brian K. LEE, Auteur ; Cecilia MAGNUSSON, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.1766-1773 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Autism spectrum disorders  Intellectual disability  Prevalence  Time trend  Stockholm  Sweden Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : In a record-linkage study in Stockholm, Sweden, the year 2011 prevalence of diagnosed autism spectrum disorders (ASD) was found to be 0.40, 1.74, 2.46, and 1.76 % among 0–5, 6–12, 13–17, and 18–27 year olds, respectively. The corresponding proportion of cases with a recorded diagnosis of intellectual disability was 17.4, 22.1, 26.1 and 29.4 %. Between 2001 and 2011, ASD prevalence increased almost 3.5 fold among children aged 2–17 years. The increase was mainly accounted for by an eightfold increase of ASD without intellectual disability (from 0.14 to 1.10 %), while the prevalence of ASD with intellectual disability increased only slightly (from 0.28 to 0.34 %). The increase in ASD prevalence is likely contributed to by extrinsic factors such as increased awareness and diagnostics. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10803-014-2336-y Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=259 [article] Changes in Prevalence of Autism Spectrum Disorders in 2001–2011: Findings from the Stockholm Youth Cohort [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Selma IDRING, Auteur ; Michael LUNDBERG, Auteur ; Harald STURM, Auteur ; Christina DALMAN, Auteur ; Clara GUMPERT, Auteur ; Dheeraj RAI, Auteur ; Brian K. LEE, Auteur ; Cecilia MAGNUSSON, Auteur . - p.1766-1773. Langues : Anglais (eng) in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders > 45-6 (June 2015) . - p.1766-1773 Mots-clés : Autism spectrum disorders  Intellectual disability  Prevalence  Time trend  Stockholm  Sweden Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : In a record-linkage study in Stockholm, Sweden, the year 2011 prevalence of diagnosed autism spectrum disorders (ASD) was found to be 0.40, 1.74, 2.46, and 1.76 % among 0–5, 6–12, 13–17, and 18–27 year olds, respectively. The corresponding proportion of cases with a recorded diagnosis of intellectual disability was 17.4, 22.1, 26.1 and 29.4 %. Between 2001 and 2011, ASD prevalence increased almost 3.5 fold among children aged 2–17 years. The increase was mainly accounted for by an eightfold increase of ASD without intellectual disability (from 0.14 to 1.10 %), while the prevalence of ASD with intellectual disability increased only slightly (from 0.28 to 0.34 %). The increase in ASD prevalence is likely contributed to by extrinsic factors such as increased awareness and diagnostics. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10803-014-2336-y Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=259

The added value of the combined use of the Autism Diagnostic Interview–Revised and the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule: Diagnostic validity in a clinical Swedish sample of toddlers and young preschoolers / Eric ZANDER in Autism, 19-2 (February 2015)  

Public ISBD [article]  inAutism > 19-2 (February 2015) . - p.187-199 Titre : The added value of the combined use of the Autism Diagnostic Interview–Revised and the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule: Diagnostic validity in a clinical Swedish sample of toddlers and young preschoolers Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Eric ZANDER, Auteur ; Harald STURM, Auteur ; Sven BÖLTE, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.187-199 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Asperger syndrome  assessment  Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (4th ed)  early detection  pervasive developmental disorder  psychometrics Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : The diagnostic validity of the new research algorithms of the Autism Diagnostic Interview–Revised and the revised algorithms of the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule was examined in a clinical sample of children aged 18–47 months. Validity was determined for each instrument separately and their combination against a clinical consensus diagnosis. A total of N = 268 children (n = 171 with autism spectrum disorder) were assessed. The new Autism Diagnostic Interview–Revised algorithms (research cutoff) gave excellent specificities (91%?96%) but low sensitivities (44%?52%). Applying adjusted cutoffs (lower than recommended based on receiver operating characteristics) yielded a better balance between sensitivity (77%?82%) and specificity (60%?62%). Findings for the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule were consistent with previous studies showing high sensitivity (94%?100%) and alongside lower specificity (52%?76%) when using the autism spectrum cutoff, but better balanced sensitivity (81%?94%) and specificity (81%?83%) when using the autism cutoff. A combination of both the Autism Diagnostic Interview–Revised (with adjusted cutoff) and the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule (autism spectrum cutoff) yielded balanced sensitivity (77%?80%) and specificity (87%?90%). Results favor a combined usage of the Autism Diagnostic Interview–Revised and Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule in young children with unclear developmental problems, including suspicion of autism spectrum disorder. Evaluated separately, the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule (cutoff for autism) provides a better diagnostic accuracy than the Autism Diagnostic Interview–Revised. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1362361313516199 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=257 [article] The added value of the combined use of the Autism Diagnostic Interview–Revised and the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule: Diagnostic validity in a clinical Swedish sample of toddlers and young preschoolers [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Eric ZANDER, Auteur ; Harald STURM, Auteur ; Sven BÖLTE, Auteur . - p.187-199. Langues : Anglais (eng) in Autism > 19-2 (February 2015) . - p.187-199 Mots-clés : Asperger syndrome  assessment  Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (4th ed)  early detection  pervasive developmental disorder  psychometrics Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : The diagnostic validity of the new research algorithms of the Autism Diagnostic Interview–Revised and the revised algorithms of the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule was examined in a clinical sample of children aged 18–47 months. Validity was determined for each instrument separately and their combination against a clinical consensus diagnosis. A total of N = 268 children (n = 171 with autism spectrum disorder) were assessed. The new Autism Diagnostic Interview–Revised algorithms (research cutoff) gave excellent specificities (91%?96%) but low sensitivities (44%?52%). Applying adjusted cutoffs (lower than recommended based on receiver operating characteristics) yielded a better balance between sensitivity (77%?82%) and specificity (60%?62%). Findings for the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule were consistent with previous studies showing high sensitivity (94%?100%) and alongside lower specificity (52%?76%) when using the autism spectrum cutoff, but better balanced sensitivity (81%?94%) and specificity (81%?83%) when using the autism cutoff. A combination of both the Autism Diagnostic Interview–Revised (with adjusted cutoff) and the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule (autism spectrum cutoff) yielded balanced sensitivity (77%?80%) and specificity (87%?90%). Results favor a combined usage of the Autism Diagnostic Interview–Revised and Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule in young children with unclear developmental problems, including suspicion of autism spectrum disorder. Evaluated separately, the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule (cutoff for autism) provides a better diagnostic accuracy than the Autism Diagnostic Interview–Revised. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1362361313516199 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=257

---

1 (1 - 3 / 3)