Emotion regulation as central to psychopathology across childhood and adolescence: a commentary on Nobakht et al. (2023) / Shannon SHAUGHNESSY in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 65-3 (March 2023)  

Public ISBD [article]  inJournal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 65-3 (March 2023) . - p.354-357 Titre : Emotion regulation as central to psychopathology across childhood and adolescence: a commentary on Nobakht et al. (2023) Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Shannon SHAUGHNESSY, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.354-357 Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : An important goal of clinical/developmental research is to identify factors contributing to the onset and maintenance of psychopathology ? particularly factors that could be modified through intervention. Large-scale, multi-informant, longitudinal studies provide valuable opportunities for testing such etiological hypotheses, as illustrated by Nobakht et al.'s recent six-wave cohort study spanning ages 4?14. At a within-person level, emotion regulation (ER) deficits consistently predicted oppositional defiant disorder (ODD) symptoms (including both irritability and defiance), whereas victimization did not. These results comport with growing evidence highlighting ER's centrality to ODD and psychopathology more broadly. While the ER findings carry promising implications, caution is warranted in interpreting the results for victimization given that its association with psychopathology is well-documented. More research is needed to test precise questions about within- and between-person processes involving ER, victimization, and psychopathology across development. Pressing research questions include whether, how, and when youths' ER can be modified, and with what effects on clinical outcomes. En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.13910 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=520 [article] Emotion regulation as central to psychopathology across childhood and adolescence: a commentary on Nobakht et al. (2023) [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Shannon SHAUGHNESSY, Auteur . - p.354-357. in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 65-3 (March 2023) . - p.354-357 Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : An important goal of clinical/developmental research is to identify factors contributing to the onset and maintenance of psychopathology ? particularly factors that could be modified through intervention. Large-scale, multi-informant, longitudinal studies provide valuable opportunities for testing such etiological hypotheses, as illustrated by Nobakht et al.'s recent six-wave cohort study spanning ages 4?14. At a within-person level, emotion regulation (ER) deficits consistently predicted oppositional defiant disorder (ODD) symptoms (including both irritability and defiance), whereas victimization did not. These results comport with growing evidence highlighting ER's centrality to ODD and psychopathology more broadly. While the ER findings carry promising implications, caution is warranted in interpreting the results for victimization given that its association with psychopathology is well-documented. More research is needed to test precise questions about within- and between-person processes involving ER, victimization, and psychopathology across development. Pressing research questions include whether, how, and when youths' ER can be modified, and with what effects on clinical outcomes. En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.13910 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=520

Network analysis of ecological momentary assessment identifies frustration as a central node in irritability / Wan-Ling TSENG in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 64-8 (August 2023)  

Public ISBD [article]  inJournal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 64-8 (August 2023) . - p.1212-1221 Titre : Network analysis of ecological momentary assessment identifies frustration as a central node in irritability Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Wan-Ling TSENG, Auteur ; Reut NAIM, Auteur ; Amanda CHUE, Auteur ; Shannon SHAUGHNESSY, Auteur ; Jennifer MEIGS, Auteur ; Daniel S. PINE, Auteur ; Ellen LEIBENLUFT, Auteur ; Katharina KIRCANSKI, Auteur ; Melissa A. BROTMAN, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.1212-1221 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Irritability  frustration  anger  mood  anxiety  ecological momentary assessment  network analysis Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Background Irritability presents transdiagnostically, commonly occurring with anxiety and other mood symptoms. However, little is known about the temporal and dynamic interplay among irritability-related clinical phenomena. Using a novel network analytic approach with smartphone-based ecological momentary assessment (EMA), we examined how irritability and other anxiety and mood symptoms were connected. Methods Sample included 152 youth ages 8 18 years (M + SD = 12.28 + 2.53; 69.74% male; 65.79% White) across several diagnostic groups enriched for irritability including disruptive mood dysregulation disorder (n = 34), oppositional defiant disorder (n = 9), attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (n = 47), anxiety disorder (n = 29), and healthy comparisons (n = 33). Participants completed EMA on irritability-related constructs and other mood and anxiety symptoms three times a day for 7 days. EMA probed symptoms on two timescales: since the last prompt (between-prompt) versus at the time of the prompt (momentary). Irritability was also assessed using parent-, child- and clinician-reports (Affective Reactivity Index; ARI), following EMA. Multilevel vector autoregressive (mlVAR) models estimated a temporal, a contemporaneous within-subject and a between-subject network of symptoms, separately for between-prompt and momentary symptoms. Results For between-prompt symptoms, frustration emerged as the most central node in both within- and between-subject networks and predicted more mood changes at the next timepoint in the temporal network. For momentary symptoms, sadness and anger emerged as the most central node in the within- and between-subject network, respectively. While anger was positively related to sadness within individuals and measurement occasions, anger was more broadly positively related to sadness, mood lability, and worry between/across individuals. Finally, mean levels, not variability, of EMA-indexed irritability were strongly related to ARI scores. Conclusions This study advances current understanding of symptom-level and temporal dynamics of irritability. Results suggest frustration as a potential clinically relevant treatment target. Future experimental work and clinical trials that systematically manipulate irritability-related features (e.g. frustration, unfairness) will elucidate the causal relations among clinical variables. En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.13794 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=508 [article] Network analysis of ecological momentary assessment identifies frustration as a central node in irritability [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Wan-Ling TSENG, Auteur ; Reut NAIM, Auteur ; Amanda CHUE, Auteur ; Shannon SHAUGHNESSY, Auteur ; Jennifer MEIGS, Auteur ; Daniel S. PINE, Auteur ; Ellen LEIBENLUFT, Auteur ; Katharina KIRCANSKI, Auteur ; Melissa A. BROTMAN, Auteur . - p.1212-1221. Langues : Anglais (eng) in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 64-8 (August 2023) . - p.1212-1221 Mots-clés : Irritability  frustration  anger  mood  anxiety  ecological momentary assessment  network analysis Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Background Irritability presents transdiagnostically, commonly occurring with anxiety and other mood symptoms. However, little is known about the temporal and dynamic interplay among irritability-related clinical phenomena. Using a novel network analytic approach with smartphone-based ecological momentary assessment (EMA), we examined how irritability and other anxiety and mood symptoms were connected. Methods Sample included 152 youth ages 8 18 years (M + SD = 12.28 + 2.53; 69.74% male; 65.79% White) across several diagnostic groups enriched for irritability including disruptive mood dysregulation disorder (n = 34), oppositional defiant disorder (n = 9), attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (n = 47), anxiety disorder (n = 29), and healthy comparisons (n = 33). Participants completed EMA on irritability-related constructs and other mood and anxiety symptoms three times a day for 7 days. EMA probed symptoms on two timescales: since the last prompt (between-prompt) versus at the time of the prompt (momentary). Irritability was also assessed using parent-, child- and clinician-reports (Affective Reactivity Index; ARI), following EMA. Multilevel vector autoregressive (mlVAR) models estimated a temporal, a contemporaneous within-subject and a between-subject network of symptoms, separately for between-prompt and momentary symptoms. Results For between-prompt symptoms, frustration emerged as the most central node in both within- and between-subject networks and predicted more mood changes at the next timepoint in the temporal network. For momentary symptoms, sadness and anger emerged as the most central node in the within- and between-subject network, respectively. While anger was positively related to sadness within individuals and measurement occasions, anger was more broadly positively related to sadness, mood lability, and worry between/across individuals. Finally, mean levels, not variability, of EMA-indexed irritability were strongly related to ARI scores. Conclusions This study advances current understanding of symptom-level and temporal dynamics of irritability. Results suggest frustration as a potential clinically relevant treatment target. Future experimental work and clinical trials that systematically manipulate irritability-related features (e.g. frustration, unfairness) will elucidate the causal relations among clinical variables. En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.13794 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=508

Using ecological momentary assessment to enhance irritability phenotyping in a transdiagnostic sample of youth / Reut NAIM in Development and Psychopathology, 33-5 (December 2021)  

Public ISBD [article]  inDevelopment and Psychopathology > 33-5 (December 2021) . - p.1734-1746 Titre : Using ecological momentary assessment to enhance irritability phenotyping in a transdiagnostic sample of youth Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Reut NAIM, Auteur ; Ashley SMITH, Auteur ; Amanda CHUE, Auteur ; Hannah GRASSIE, Auteur ; Julia LINKE, Auteur ; Kelly DOMBEK, Auteur ; Shannon SHAUGHNESSY, Auteur ; Cheri MCNEIL, Auteur ; Elise M. CARDINALE, Auteur ; Courtney AGORSOR, Auteur ; Sofia CARDENAS, Auteur ; Julia BROOKS, Auteur ; Anni R. SUBAR, Auteur ; Emily L. JONES, Auteur ; Quyen B. DO, Auteur ; Daniel S. PINE, Auteur ; Ellen LEIBENLUFT, Auteur ; Melissa A. BROTMAN, Auteur ; Katharina KIRCANSKI, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.1734-1746 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : disruptive mood dysregulation disorder  ecological momentary assessment  frustrative nonreward  irritability  transdiagnostic Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Irritability is a transdiagnostic symptom dimension in developmental psychopathology, closely related to the Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) construct of frustrative nonreward. Consistent with the RDoC framework and calls for transdiagnostic, developmentally-sensitive assessment methods, we report data from a smartphone-based, naturalistic ecological momentary assessment (EMA) study of irritability. We assessed 109 children and adolescents (Mage = 12.55 years; 75.20% male) encompassing several diagnostic groups – disruptive mood dysregulation disorder (DMDD), attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), anxiety disorders (ANX), healthy volunteers (HV). The participants rated symptoms three times per day for 1 week. Compliance with the EMA protocol was high. As tested using multilevel modeling, EMA ratings of irritability were strongly and consistently associated with in-clinic, gold-standard measures of irritability. Further, EMA ratings of irritability were significantly related to subjective frustration during a laboratory task eliciting frustrative nonreward. Irritability levels exhibited an expected graduated pattern across diagnostic groups, and the different EMA items measuring irritability were significantly associated with one another within all groups, supporting the transdiagnostic phenomenology of irritability. Additional analyses utilized EMA ratings of anxiety as a comparison with respect to convergent validity and transdiagnostic phenomenology. The results support new measurement tools that can be used in future studies of irritability and frustrative nonreward. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0954579421000717 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=457 [article] Using ecological momentary assessment to enhance irritability phenotyping in a transdiagnostic sample of youth [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Reut NAIM, Auteur ; Ashley SMITH, Auteur ; Amanda CHUE, Auteur ; Hannah GRASSIE, Auteur ; Julia LINKE, Auteur ; Kelly DOMBEK, Auteur ; Shannon SHAUGHNESSY, Auteur ; Cheri MCNEIL, Auteur ; Elise M. CARDINALE, Auteur ; Courtney AGORSOR, Auteur ; Sofia CARDENAS, Auteur ; Julia BROOKS, Auteur ; Anni R. SUBAR, Auteur ; Emily L. JONES, Auteur ; Quyen B. DO, Auteur ; Daniel S. PINE, Auteur ; Ellen LEIBENLUFT, Auteur ; Melissa A. BROTMAN, Auteur ; Katharina KIRCANSKI, Auteur . - p.1734-1746. Langues : Anglais (eng) in Development and Psychopathology > 33-5 (December 2021) . - p.1734-1746 Mots-clés : disruptive mood dysregulation disorder  ecological momentary assessment  frustrative nonreward  irritability  transdiagnostic Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Irritability is a transdiagnostic symptom dimension in developmental psychopathology, closely related to the Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) construct of frustrative nonreward. Consistent with the RDoC framework and calls for transdiagnostic, developmentally-sensitive assessment methods, we report data from a smartphone-based, naturalistic ecological momentary assessment (EMA) study of irritability. We assessed 109 children and adolescents (Mage = 12.55 years; 75.20% male) encompassing several diagnostic groups – disruptive mood dysregulation disorder (DMDD), attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), anxiety disorders (ANX), healthy volunteers (HV). The participants rated symptoms three times per day for 1 week. Compliance with the EMA protocol was high. As tested using multilevel modeling, EMA ratings of irritability were strongly and consistently associated with in-clinic, gold-standard measures of irritability. Further, EMA ratings of irritability were significantly related to subjective frustration during a laboratory task eliciting frustrative nonreward. Irritability levels exhibited an expected graduated pattern across diagnostic groups, and the different EMA items measuring irritability were significantly associated with one another within all groups, supporting the transdiagnostic phenomenology of irritability. Additional analyses utilized EMA ratings of anxiety as a comparison with respect to convergent validity and transdiagnostic phenomenology. The results support new measurement tools that can be used in future studies of irritability and frustrative nonreward. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0954579421000717 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=457

---

1 (1 - 3 / 3)