
- <Centre d'Information et de documentation du CRA Rhône-Alpes
- CRA
- Informations pratiques
-
Adresse
Centre d'information et de documentation
Horaires
du CRA Rhône-Alpes
Centre Hospitalier le Vinatier
bât 211
95, Bd Pinel
69678 Bron CedexLundi au Vendredi
Contact
9h00-12h00 13h30-16h00Tél: +33(0)4 37 91 54 65
Mail
Fax: +33(0)4 37 91 54 37
-
Adresse
Détail de l'auteur
Auteur Cheng-Kai JIN |
Documents disponibles écrits par cet auteur (2)



Empathizing, systemizing, empathizing-systemizing difference and their association with autistic traits in children with autism spectrum disorder, with and without intellectual disability / Ning PAN in Autism Research, 15-7 (July 2022)
![]()
[article]
Titre : Empathizing, systemizing, empathizing-systemizing difference and their association with autistic traits in children with autism spectrum disorder, with and without intellectual disability Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Ning PAN, Auteur ; Bonnie AUYEUNG, Auteur ; Xin WANG, Auteur ; Li-Zi LIN, Auteur ; Hai-Lin LI, Auteur ; Xiao-Ling ZHAN, Auteur ; Cheng-Kai JIN, Auteur ; Jin JING, Auteur ; Xiu-Hong LI, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.1348-1357 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : autism spectrum disorder empathy intellectual disability systemizing Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Empathizing, systemizing, and empathizing-systemizing difference can be linked to autistic traits in the general adult population and those with autism spectrum disorder (ASD), but these profiles and associations remain unclear in children with ASD, with and without intellectual disability (ASD?+?ID; ASD-noID). We recruited three groups including 160 boys with ASD (73 ASD?+?ID; 87 ASD-noID) and 99 typically developing (TD) boys (6-12?years). We measured empathizing, systemizing, and empathizing-systemizing difference using the parent-reported child Empathy and Systemizing Quotient (EQ-C/SQ-C). We measured autistic traits using the Social Responsiveness Scale (SRS). Among the three groups, children with ASD?+?ID and ASD-noID scored lower on the EQ-C and SQ-C than TD children (all p?0.001). There was no difference in the EQ-C between children with ASD?+?ID and ASD-noID (16.59?+?5.53 vs. 16.23?+?5.85, p = 0.973), and the difference in the SQ-C attenuated to null when adjusting for intelligence between children with ASD-noID and TD children (18.89?+?7.80 vs. 24.15?+?6.73, p = 0.089). Children with ASD?+?ID scored higher on empathizing-systemizing difference than TD children but lower than children with ASD-noID (all p?0.05). Negative associations between EQ-C and all autistic traits, null associations between SQ-C and all autistic traits, and positive associations between empathizing-systemizing difference and all autistic traits were found in all groups. We observed differences in empathizing, systemizing, and empathizing-systemizing difference and the consistency of their associations with autistic traits among the three groups. Our findings provide implication that behavioral interventions of ASD should consider the balance of empathizing and systemizing. LAY SUMMARY: We examined the profiles of empathizing, systemizing, and empathizing-systemizing difference in children with autism spectrum disorder, with and without intellectual disability (ASD?+?ID; ASD-noID), and typically developing (TD) children aged 6-12?years. We observed differences in these profiles and the consistency of their associations with autistic traits among the three groups. Empathizing and empathizing-systemizing difference, rather than systemizing, were associated with autistic traits within the three groups. Our findings provide implication that behavioral interventions of ASD should consider these imbalance profiles. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/aur.2766 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=477
in Autism Research > 15-7 (July 2022) . - p.1348-1357[article] Empathizing, systemizing, empathizing-systemizing difference and their association with autistic traits in children with autism spectrum disorder, with and without intellectual disability [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Ning PAN, Auteur ; Bonnie AUYEUNG, Auteur ; Xin WANG, Auteur ; Li-Zi LIN, Auteur ; Hai-Lin LI, Auteur ; Xiao-Ling ZHAN, Auteur ; Cheng-Kai JIN, Auteur ; Jin JING, Auteur ; Xiu-Hong LI, Auteur . - p.1348-1357.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Autism Research > 15-7 (July 2022) . - p.1348-1357
Mots-clés : autism spectrum disorder empathy intellectual disability systemizing Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Empathizing, systemizing, and empathizing-systemizing difference can be linked to autistic traits in the general adult population and those with autism spectrum disorder (ASD), but these profiles and associations remain unclear in children with ASD, with and without intellectual disability (ASD?+?ID; ASD-noID). We recruited three groups including 160 boys with ASD (73 ASD?+?ID; 87 ASD-noID) and 99 typically developing (TD) boys (6-12?years). We measured empathizing, systemizing, and empathizing-systemizing difference using the parent-reported child Empathy and Systemizing Quotient (EQ-C/SQ-C). We measured autistic traits using the Social Responsiveness Scale (SRS). Among the three groups, children with ASD?+?ID and ASD-noID scored lower on the EQ-C and SQ-C than TD children (all p?0.001). There was no difference in the EQ-C between children with ASD?+?ID and ASD-noID (16.59?+?5.53 vs. 16.23?+?5.85, p = 0.973), and the difference in the SQ-C attenuated to null when adjusting for intelligence between children with ASD-noID and TD children (18.89?+?7.80 vs. 24.15?+?6.73, p = 0.089). Children with ASD?+?ID scored higher on empathizing-systemizing difference than TD children but lower than children with ASD-noID (all p?0.05). Negative associations between EQ-C and all autistic traits, null associations between SQ-C and all autistic traits, and positive associations between empathizing-systemizing difference and all autistic traits were found in all groups. We observed differences in empathizing, systemizing, and empathizing-systemizing difference and the consistency of their associations with autistic traits among the three groups. Our findings provide implication that behavioral interventions of ASD should consider the balance of empathizing and systemizing. LAY SUMMARY: We examined the profiles of empathizing, systemizing, and empathizing-systemizing difference in children with autism spectrum disorder, with and without intellectual disability (ASD?+?ID; ASD-noID), and typically developing (TD) children aged 6-12?years. We observed differences in these profiles and the consistency of their associations with autistic traits among the three groups. Empathizing and empathizing-systemizing difference, rather than systemizing, were associated with autistic traits within the three groups. Our findings provide implication that behavioral interventions of ASD should consider these imbalance profiles. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/aur.2766 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=477 The validity and reliability of the simplified Chinese version of the Social Communication Questionnaire / Si-Yu LIU in Autism Research, 15-9 (September 2022)
![]()
[article]
Titre : The validity and reliability of the simplified Chinese version of the Social Communication Questionnaire Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Si-Yu LIU, Auteur ; Xin WANG, Auteur ; Qiang CHEN, Auteur ; Jia-Jie CHEN, Auteur ; Cheng-Kai JIN, Auteur ; Xiao-Ling ZHAN, Auteur ; Cui-Hua GUO, Auteur ; Xiu-Hong LI, Auteur ; Li-Zi LIN, Auteur ; Jin JING, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.1732-1741 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Autism Spectrum Disorder/diagnosis Child Child, Preschool China Communication Humans Psychometrics Reproducibility of Results Surveys and Questionnaires Social Communication Questionnaire autism spectrum disorder reliability validity Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : This study aims to validate the simplified Chinese version of the Social Communication Questionnaire (SCQ) in children aged 2-12years from both general and clinical populations. We recruited 819 Chinese children in this study, including 505 typically developing (TD) children, 202 children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and 112 children with non-ASD neurodevelopmental disorders. All the children's parents completed the simplified Chinese version of the SCQ and all children with ASD were additionally assessed for intelligence and the Childhood Autism Rating Scale to confirm their diagnosis. We have developed a 40-item, 4-factor structure of SCQ with two domains (social communication and social interaction; and restricted, repetitive, and stereotyped patterns of behavior), which showed adequate goodness of fit (comparative fit index [CFI] = 0.96, Tucker-Lewisindex [TLI] = 0.95, standardized root mean squared residual [SRMR] = 0.07, root mean square error of approximation [RMSEA] = 0.05), with good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.92). We have provided different cut-offs to distinguish ASD cases from TD children (11 for children under 4years [sensitivity: 0.96, specificity: 0.95], 12 for children 4years and above [sensitivity: 0.93, specificity: 0.98]) or children with other neurodevelopmental disorders (14 [sensitivity: 0.85, specificity: 0.88]). Through this large sample validation, we confirmed that the simplified Chinese version of the SCQ could be used for children aged 2-12years with relatively good psychometric properties. LAY SUMMARY: We aimed to develop the simplified Chinese version of the Social Communication Questionnaire (SCQ) for Chinese children aged 2-12years as a screening tool to identified potential risk of autism spectrum disorder (ASD). We have developed a 40-item, 4-factor structure of SCQ with two domains, which showed adequate goodness of fit and good psychometric properties. We also provided different cut-offs to identify ASD cases in general or clinical populations. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/aur.2726 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=483
in Autism Research > 15-9 (September 2022) . - p.1732-1741[article] The validity and reliability of the simplified Chinese version of the Social Communication Questionnaire [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Si-Yu LIU, Auteur ; Xin WANG, Auteur ; Qiang CHEN, Auteur ; Jia-Jie CHEN, Auteur ; Cheng-Kai JIN, Auteur ; Xiao-Ling ZHAN, Auteur ; Cui-Hua GUO, Auteur ; Xiu-Hong LI, Auteur ; Li-Zi LIN, Auteur ; Jin JING, Auteur . - p.1732-1741.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Autism Research > 15-9 (September 2022) . - p.1732-1741
Mots-clés : Autism Spectrum Disorder/diagnosis Child Child, Preschool China Communication Humans Psychometrics Reproducibility of Results Surveys and Questionnaires Social Communication Questionnaire autism spectrum disorder reliability validity Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : This study aims to validate the simplified Chinese version of the Social Communication Questionnaire (SCQ) in children aged 2-12years from both general and clinical populations. We recruited 819 Chinese children in this study, including 505 typically developing (TD) children, 202 children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and 112 children with non-ASD neurodevelopmental disorders. All the children's parents completed the simplified Chinese version of the SCQ and all children with ASD were additionally assessed for intelligence and the Childhood Autism Rating Scale to confirm their diagnosis. We have developed a 40-item, 4-factor structure of SCQ with two domains (social communication and social interaction; and restricted, repetitive, and stereotyped patterns of behavior), which showed adequate goodness of fit (comparative fit index [CFI] = 0.96, Tucker-Lewisindex [TLI] = 0.95, standardized root mean squared residual [SRMR] = 0.07, root mean square error of approximation [RMSEA] = 0.05), with good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.92). We have provided different cut-offs to distinguish ASD cases from TD children (11 for children under 4years [sensitivity: 0.96, specificity: 0.95], 12 for children 4years and above [sensitivity: 0.93, specificity: 0.98]) or children with other neurodevelopmental disorders (14 [sensitivity: 0.85, specificity: 0.88]). Through this large sample validation, we confirmed that the simplified Chinese version of the SCQ could be used for children aged 2-12years with relatively good psychometric properties. LAY SUMMARY: We aimed to develop the simplified Chinese version of the Social Communication Questionnaire (SCQ) for Chinese children aged 2-12years as a screening tool to identified potential risk of autism spectrum disorder (ASD). We have developed a 40-item, 4-factor structure of SCQ with two domains, which showed adequate goodness of fit and good psychometric properties. We also provided different cut-offs to identify ASD cases in general or clinical populations. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/aur.2726 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=483