Adolescent girls' stress responses as prospective predictors of self-injurious thoughts and behaviors: A person-centered, multilevel study / Jason José BENDEZÚ in Development and Psychopathology, 34-4 (October 2022)  

Public ISBD [article]  inDevelopment and Psychopathology > 34-4 (October 2022) . - p.1447-1467 Titre : Adolescent girls' stress responses as prospective predictors of self-injurious thoughts and behaviors: A person-centered, multilevel study Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Jason José BENDEZÚ, Auteur ; Casey D. CALHOUN, Auteur ; Megan W. PATTERSON, Auteur ; Abigail FINDLEY, Auteur ; Karen D. RUDOLPH, Auteur ; Paul HASTINGS, Auteur ; Matthew K. NOCK, Auteur ; Mitchell J. PRINSTEIN, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.1447-1467 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Adolescent  Adolescent Behavior/psychology  Child  Female  Humans  Hydrocortisone  Self-Injurious Behavior/psychology  Suicidal Ideation  adolescence  cortisol  negative affect  nonsuicidal self-injury  positive affect Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Adolescent risk for self-injurious thoughts and behaviors (STBs) involves disturbance across multiple systems (e.g., affective valence, arousal regulatory, cognitive and social processes). However, research integrating information across these systems is lacking. Utilizing a multiple-levels-of-analysis approach, this person-centered study identified psychobiological stress response profiles and linked them to cognitive processes, interpersonal behaviors, and STBs. At baseline, adolescent girls (N = 241, M(age) = 14.68 years, Range = 12-17) at risk for STBs completed the Trier Social Stress Test (TSST), questionnaires, and STB interviews. Positive affect (PA), negative affect (NA), and salivary cortisol (SC) were assessed before and after the TSST. STBs were assessed again during 3, 6, and 9 month follow-up interviews. Multitrajectory modeling of girls' PA, NA, and SC revealed four profiles, which were compared on cognitive and behavioral correlates as well as STB outcomes. Relative to normative, girls in the affective distress, hyperresponsive, and hyporesponsive subgroups were more likely to report negative cognitive style (all three groups) and excessive reassurance seeking (hyporesponsive only) at baseline, as well as nonsuicidal self-injury (all three groups) and suicidal ideation and attempt (hyporesponsive only) at follow-up. Girls' close friendship characteristics moderated several profile-STB links. A synthesis of the findings is presented alongside implications for person-centered tailoring of intervention efforts. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0954579420002229 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=489 [article] Adolescent girls' stress responses as prospective predictors of self-injurious thoughts and behaviors: A person-centered, multilevel study [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Jason José BENDEZÚ, Auteur ; Casey D. CALHOUN, Auteur ; Megan W. PATTERSON, Auteur ; Abigail FINDLEY, Auteur ; Karen D. RUDOLPH, Auteur ; Paul HASTINGS, Auteur ; Matthew K. NOCK, Auteur ; Mitchell J. PRINSTEIN, Auteur . - p.1447-1467. Langues : Anglais (eng) in Development and Psychopathology > 34-4 (October 2022) . - p.1447-1467 Mots-clés : Adolescent  Adolescent Behavior/psychology  Child  Female  Humans  Hydrocortisone  Self-Injurious Behavior/psychology  Suicidal Ideation  adolescence  cortisol  negative affect  nonsuicidal self-injury  positive affect Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Adolescent risk for self-injurious thoughts and behaviors (STBs) involves disturbance across multiple systems (e.g., affective valence, arousal regulatory, cognitive and social processes). However, research integrating information across these systems is lacking. Utilizing a multiple-levels-of-analysis approach, this person-centered study identified psychobiological stress response profiles and linked them to cognitive processes, interpersonal behaviors, and STBs. At baseline, adolescent girls (N = 241, M(age) = 14.68 years, Range = 12-17) at risk for STBs completed the Trier Social Stress Test (TSST), questionnaires, and STB interviews. Positive affect (PA), negative affect (NA), and salivary cortisol (SC) were assessed before and after the TSST. STBs were assessed again during 3, 6, and 9 month follow-up interviews. Multitrajectory modeling of girls' PA, NA, and SC revealed four profiles, which were compared on cognitive and behavioral correlates as well as STB outcomes. Relative to normative, girls in the affective distress, hyperresponsive, and hyporesponsive subgroups were more likely to report negative cognitive style (all three groups) and excessive reassurance seeking (hyporesponsive only) at baseline, as well as nonsuicidal self-injury (all three groups) and suicidal ideation and attempt (hyporesponsive only) at follow-up. Girls' close friendship characteristics moderated several profile-STB links. A synthesis of the findings is presented alongside implications for person-centered tailoring of intervention efforts. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0954579420002229 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=489

Developmental changes in genetic and environmental influences on rule-breaking and aggression: age and pubertal development / K. Paige HARDEN in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 56-12 (December 2015)  

Public ISBD [article]  inJournal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 56-12 (December 2015) . - p.1370-1379 Titre : Developmental changes in genetic and environmental influences on rule-breaking and aggression: age and pubertal development Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : K. Paige HARDEN, Auteur ; Megan W. PATTERSON, Auteur ; Daniel A. BRILEY, Auteur ; Laura E. ENGELHARDT, Auteur ; Natalie KRETSCH, Auteur ; Frank D. MANN, Auteur ; Jennifer L. TACKETT, Auteur ; Elliot M. TUCKER-DROB, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.1370-1379 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Antisocial behavior  aggression  rule-breaking  puberty  adolescence  behavior genetics Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Background Antisocial behavior (ASB) can be meaningfully divided into nonaggressive rule-breaking versus aggressive dimensions, which differ in developmental course and etiology. Previous research has found that genetic influences on rule-breaking, but not aggression, increase from late childhood to mid-adolescence. This study tested the extent to which the developmental increase in genetic influence on rule-breaking was associated with pubertal development compared to chronological age. Method Child and adolescent twins (n = 1,031), ranging in age from 8 to 20 years (M age = 13.5 years), were recruited from public schools as part of the Texas Twin Project. Participants reported on their pubertal development using the Pubertal Development Scale and on their involvement in ASB on items from the Child Behavior Checklist. Measurement invariance of ASB subtypes across age groups (?12 years vs. >12 years old) was tested using confirmatory factor analyses. Quantitative genetic modeling was used to test whether the genetic and environmental influences on aggression and rule-breaking were moderated by age, pubertal status, or both. Results Quantitative genetic modeling indicated that genetic influences specific to rule-breaking increased as a function of pubertal development controlling for age (a gene × puberty interaction), but did not vary as a function of age controlling for pubertal status. There were no developmental differences in the genetic etiology of aggression. Family-level environmental influences common to aggression and rule-breaking decreased with age, further contributing to the differentiation between these subtypes of ASB from childhood to adolescence. Conclusions Future research should discriminate between alternative possible mechanisms underlying gene × puberty interactions on rule-breaking forms of antisocial behavior, including possible effects of pubertal hormones on gene expression. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12419 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=273 [article] Developmental changes in genetic and environmental influences on rule-breaking and aggression: age and pubertal development [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / K. Paige HARDEN, Auteur ; Megan W. PATTERSON, Auteur ; Daniel A. BRILEY, Auteur ; Laura E. ENGELHARDT, Auteur ; Natalie KRETSCH, Auteur ; Frank D. MANN, Auteur ; Jennifer L. TACKETT, Auteur ; Elliot M. TUCKER-DROB, Auteur . - p.1370-1379. Langues : Anglais (eng) in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 56-12 (December 2015) . - p.1370-1379 Mots-clés : Antisocial behavior  aggression  rule-breaking  puberty  adolescence  behavior genetics Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Background Antisocial behavior (ASB) can be meaningfully divided into nonaggressive rule-breaking versus aggressive dimensions, which differ in developmental course and etiology. Previous research has found that genetic influences on rule-breaking, but not aggression, increase from late childhood to mid-adolescence. This study tested the extent to which the developmental increase in genetic influence on rule-breaking was associated with pubertal development compared to chronological age. Method Child and adolescent twins (n = 1,031), ranging in age from 8 to 20 years (M age = 13.5 years), were recruited from public schools as part of the Texas Twin Project. Participants reported on their pubertal development using the Pubertal Development Scale and on their involvement in ASB on items from the Child Behavior Checklist. Measurement invariance of ASB subtypes across age groups (?12 years vs. >12 years old) was tested using confirmatory factor analyses. Quantitative genetic modeling was used to test whether the genetic and environmental influences on aggression and rule-breaking were moderated by age, pubertal status, or both. Results Quantitative genetic modeling indicated that genetic influences specific to rule-breaking increased as a function of pubertal development controlling for age (a gene × puberty interaction), but did not vary as a function of age controlling for pubertal status. There were no developmental differences in the genetic etiology of aggression. Family-level environmental influences common to aggression and rule-breaking decreased with age, further contributing to the differentiation between these subtypes of ASB from childhood to adolescence. Conclusions Future research should discriminate between alternative possible mechanisms underlying gene × puberty interactions on rule-breaking forms of antisocial behavior, including possible effects of pubertal hormones on gene expression. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12419 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=273

---

1 (1 - 2 / 2)