Accuracy of a 2-minute eye-tracking assessment to differentiate young children with and without autism / Kristelle HUDRY in Molecular Autism, 16 (2025)  

Public ISBD [article]  inMolecular Autism > 16 (2025) . - 36 Titre : Accuracy of a 2-minute eye-tracking assessment to differentiate young children with and without autism Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Kristelle HUDRY, Auteur ; Lacey CHETCUTI, Auteur ; Diana Weiting TAN, Auteur ; Alena CLARK, Auteur ; Alexandra AULICH, Auteur ; Catherine A. BENT, Auteur ; Cherie C. GREEN, Auteur ; Jodie SMITH, Auteur ; Kathryn FORDYCE, Auteur ; Masaru NINOMIYA, Auteur ; Atsushi SAITO, Auteur ; Shuji HAKOSHIMA, Auteur ; Andrew J. O. WHITEHOUSE, Auteur ; Kristelle Secondary HUDRY, Auteur ; Lacey CHETCUTI, Auteur ; Diana Weiting TAN, Auteur ; Alena CLARK, Auteur ; Alexandra AULICH, Auteur ; Catherine A. BENT, Auteur ; Cherie C. GREEN, Auteur ; Jodie SMITH, Auteur ; Kathryn FORDYCE, Auteur ; Masaru NINOMIYA, Auteur ; Atsushi SAITO, Auteur ; Shuji HAKOSHIMA, Auteur ; Andrew J. O. WHITEHOUSE, Auteur Article en page(s) : 36 Langues : Anglais (eng) Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : BACKGROUND: Eye-tracking could expedite autism identification/diagnosis through standardisation and objectivity. We tested whether Gazefinder autism assessment, with Classification Algorithm derived from gaze fixation durations, would have good accuracy (area under the curve [AUC] ≥ 0.80) to differentiate 2-4-year-old autistic from non-autistic children. METHODS: Community sampling (March 2019-March 2021) of 2:00–4:11 year-olds included children recruited into a diagnosed Autism Group (‘cases’) and Non-Autism ‘Control’ Group (with likely undiagnosed autism minimised). We recruited well beyond minimum necessary sample size to ensure within-group heterogeneity and allow exploratory subgroup analysis. Alongside Gazefinder eye-tracking attempted with all recruited participants, we collected parent-report measures for all children, and clinical/behavioural measures with autistic children. RESULTS: 102 autistic (81.4% male; M(age)= 44mths; SD = 8.8) and 101 non-autistic children (57.4% male; M = 40; SD = 10.5) were recruited and eligible; the former slightly older, proportionately more male, and reflecting greater socio-demographic diversity. Gazefinder autism assessment was completed with 101 non-autistic children (n = 1 returning minimal data), and attempted with 100- and completed with 96 autistic children (n = 2 not attempted following adverse responses to clinical testing; n = 4 attempted but unable to calibrate). The Non-Autism Group returned significantly more overall tracking data. The final Classification Algorithm (range 0-100; threshold score = 28.6)—derived from n = 196 children’s fixation durations to elements of social/non-social scenes, human face presentations, and referential attention trials—had AUC = 0.82 (sensitivity = 0.82, specificity = 0.70). Compared to those correctly classified, autistic children misclassified as ‘controls’ showed greater overall tracking, and less pronounced autism features and developmental disability. Compared to correctly classified non-autistic children, those misclassified as ‘cases’ were older with lower overall tracking. LIMITATIONS: Our groups differed on socio-demographic characteristics and overall tracking (included within the Classification Algorithm). We used the ‘Scene 10A’ stimulus set as provided, without update/modification. Industry employees who developed the final Algorithm were non-blinded to child group, and considered only gaze fixation durations. Community sampling and ‘case-control’ design—comparing diagnosed autistic vs. non-autistic children—could be improved via future referral-based recruitment. CONCLUSIONS: Most children tolerated Gazefinder autism assessment, and our Classification Algorithm properties approached those reported from other Gazefinder use and established clinical assessments. Independent replication is required, and research informing the most suitable clinical application of this technology. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ACTRN12619000317190 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13229-025-00670-4. En ligne : https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13229-025-00670-4 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=569 [article] Accuracy of a 2-minute eye-tracking assessment to differentiate young children with and without autism [texte imprimé] / Kristelle HUDRY, Auteur ; Lacey CHETCUTI, Auteur ; Diana Weiting TAN, Auteur ; Alena CLARK, Auteur ; Alexandra AULICH, Auteur ; Catherine A. BENT, Auteur ; Cherie C. GREEN, Auteur ; Jodie SMITH, Auteur ; Kathryn FORDYCE, Auteur ; Masaru NINOMIYA, Auteur ; Atsushi SAITO, Auteur ; Shuji HAKOSHIMA, Auteur ; Andrew J. O. WHITEHOUSE, Auteur ; Kristelle Secondary HUDRY, Auteur ; Lacey CHETCUTI, Auteur ; Diana Weiting TAN, Auteur ; Alena CLARK, Auteur ; Alexandra AULICH, Auteur ; Catherine A. BENT, Auteur ; Cherie C. GREEN, Auteur ; Jodie SMITH, Auteur ; Kathryn FORDYCE, Auteur ; Masaru NINOMIYA, Auteur ; Atsushi SAITO, Auteur ; Shuji HAKOSHIMA, Auteur ; Andrew J. O. WHITEHOUSE, Auteur . - 36. Langues : Anglais (eng) in Molecular Autism > 16 (2025) . - 36 Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : BACKGROUND: Eye-tracking could expedite autism identification/diagnosis through standardisation and objectivity. We tested whether Gazefinder autism assessment, with Classification Algorithm derived from gaze fixation durations, would have good accuracy (area under the curve [AUC] ≥ 0.80) to differentiate 2-4-year-old autistic from non-autistic children. METHODS: Community sampling (March 2019-March 2021) of 2:00–4:11 year-olds included children recruited into a diagnosed Autism Group (‘cases’) and Non-Autism ‘Control’ Group (with likely undiagnosed autism minimised). We recruited well beyond minimum necessary sample size to ensure within-group heterogeneity and allow exploratory subgroup analysis. Alongside Gazefinder eye-tracking attempted with all recruited participants, we collected parent-report measures for all children, and clinical/behavioural measures with autistic children. RESULTS: 102 autistic (81.4% male; M(age)= 44mths; SD = 8.8) and 101 non-autistic children (57.4% male; M = 40; SD = 10.5) were recruited and eligible; the former slightly older, proportionately more male, and reflecting greater socio-demographic diversity. Gazefinder autism assessment was completed with 101 non-autistic children (n = 1 returning minimal data), and attempted with 100- and completed with 96 autistic children (n = 2 not attempted following adverse responses to clinical testing; n = 4 attempted but unable to calibrate). The Non-Autism Group returned significantly more overall tracking data. The final Classification Algorithm (range 0-100; threshold score = 28.6)—derived from n = 196 children’s fixation durations to elements of social/non-social scenes, human face presentations, and referential attention trials—had AUC = 0.82 (sensitivity = 0.82, specificity = 0.70). Compared to those correctly classified, autistic children misclassified as ‘controls’ showed greater overall tracking, and less pronounced autism features and developmental disability. Compared to correctly classified non-autistic children, those misclassified as ‘cases’ were older with lower overall tracking. LIMITATIONS: Our groups differed on socio-demographic characteristics and overall tracking (included within the Classification Algorithm). We used the ‘Scene 10A’ stimulus set as provided, without update/modification. Industry employees who developed the final Algorithm were non-blinded to child group, and considered only gaze fixation durations. Community sampling and ‘case-control’ design—comparing diagnosed autistic vs. non-autistic children—could be improved via future referral-based recruitment. CONCLUSIONS: Most children tolerated Gazefinder autism assessment, and our Classification Algorithm properties approached those reported from other Gazefinder use and established clinical assessments. Independent replication is required, and research informing the most suitable clinical application of this technology. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ACTRN12619000317190 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13229-025-00670-4. En ligne : https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13229-025-00670-4 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=569

Autistic and autism community perspectives on infant and family support in the first two years of life: Findings from a community consultation survey / Catherine A BENT in Autism, 29-9 (September 2025)  

Public ISBD [article]  inAutism > 29-9 (September 2025) . - p.2282-2296 Titre : Autistic and autism community perspectives on infant and family support in the first two years of life: Findings from a community consultation survey Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Catherine A BENT, Auteur ; Alexandra AULICH, Auteur ; Christos CONSTANTINE, Auteur ; Esther FIDOCK, Auteur ; Patrick DWYER, Auteur ; Cherie GREEN, Auteur ; Jodie SMITH, Auteur ; Ava N GURBA, Auteur ; Lucas T HARRINGTON, Auteur ; Katherine E GORE, Auteur ; Aspasia Stacey RABBA, Auteur ; Lauren N AYTON, Auteur ; Kathryn FORDYCE, Auteur ; Jonathan GREEN, Auteur ; Rachel JELLETT, Auteur ; Lyndel J KENNEDY, Auteur ; Katherine E MACDUFFIE, Auteur ; Shoba S MEERA, Auteur ; Linda R WATSON, Auteur ; Andrew JO WHITEHOUSE, Auteur ; Kristelle HUDRY, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.2282-2296 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : autism  autistic  infancy  intervention  neurodiversity  parenting  participatory research  support Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Emerging evidence suggests parenting supports implemented in the first 2 years of life may influence developmental outcomes for infants more likely to be Autistic. Yet questions remain about acceptability of these supports to the Autistic and autism communities. Through mixed-methods participatory research - co-designed and produced by Autistic and non-Autistic researchers - we sought diverse community perspectives on this topic, including to understand the relative acceptability of different support options. A total of 238 participants completed our online survey: 128 Autistic and 110 non-Autistic respondents, some of whom also self-identified as parents of Autistic, otherwise neurodivergent, and/or neurotypical children, and/or as health/education professionals and/or researchers. Most participants agreed that very-early-in-life approaches should help parents understand and support their children, and disagreed that these should seek to suppress autistic behaviour. Most agreed with the goal of respecting infant autonomy, and that parent education towards creating sensitive, accommodating environments could be appropriate, albeit with nuanced differences-of-opinion regarding the acceptability of specific therapeutic approaches. Participants generally endorsed the terms 'support' (vs 'intervention') and 'early-in-life' (vs 'at-risk'/'pre-emptive'). Engaging equal-power partnerships for the development, delivery of, and discourse around early-in-life autism supports will ensure end-user community values and needs are respected.Lay abstract Most support programmes for Autistic children are available only after they are diagnosed. Research suggests that parenting supports may be helpful for parents and their infants, when provided in the first 2 years of life - before a formal diagnosis is given, but when information suggests an infant is more likely to be Autistic. However, we do not know how acceptable these types of supports might be to the Autistic and autism communities. We asked 238 Autistic and non-autistic people - some of whom were parents, and some of whom were professionals working in research, health and education - about their perspectives on very-early supports. People generally agreed that it could be acceptable to work with parents to help them understand and support their child?s specific needs and unique ways of communicating. People suggested a variety of support strategies could be acceptable, including parent education, changing the environment to meet an infant?s needs, and creating opportunities for infants' to make choices and exercise control. People preferred respectful and accurate language - including the term 'support' (rather than 'intervention') and 'early-in-life' (rather than 'at-risk' of autism, or 'pre-emptive' when describing developmental stage). Continuing to work with community members will help to make sure autism support programmes are relevant and helpful. En ligne : https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/13623613241262077 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=566 [article] Autistic and autism community perspectives on infant and family support in the first two years of life: Findings from a community consultation survey [texte imprimé] / Catherine A BENT, Auteur ; Alexandra AULICH, Auteur ; Christos CONSTANTINE, Auteur ; Esther FIDOCK, Auteur ; Patrick DWYER, Auteur ; Cherie GREEN, Auteur ; Jodie SMITH, Auteur ; Ava N GURBA, Auteur ; Lucas T HARRINGTON, Auteur ; Katherine E GORE, Auteur ; Aspasia Stacey RABBA, Auteur ; Lauren N AYTON, Auteur ; Kathryn FORDYCE, Auteur ; Jonathan GREEN, Auteur ; Rachel JELLETT, Auteur ; Lyndel J KENNEDY, Auteur ; Katherine E MACDUFFIE, Auteur ; Shoba S MEERA, Auteur ; Linda R WATSON, Auteur ; Andrew JO WHITEHOUSE, Auteur ; Kristelle HUDRY, Auteur . - p.2282-2296. Langues : Anglais (eng) in Autism > 29-9 (September 2025) . - p.2282-2296 Mots-clés : autism  autistic  infancy  intervention  neurodiversity  parenting  participatory research  support Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Emerging evidence suggests parenting supports implemented in the first 2 years of life may influence developmental outcomes for infants more likely to be Autistic. Yet questions remain about acceptability of these supports to the Autistic and autism communities. Through mixed-methods participatory research - co-designed and produced by Autistic and non-Autistic researchers - we sought diverse community perspectives on this topic, including to understand the relative acceptability of different support options. A total of 238 participants completed our online survey: 128 Autistic and 110 non-Autistic respondents, some of whom also self-identified as parents of Autistic, otherwise neurodivergent, and/or neurotypical children, and/or as health/education professionals and/or researchers. Most participants agreed that very-early-in-life approaches should help parents understand and support their children, and disagreed that these should seek to suppress autistic behaviour. Most agreed with the goal of respecting infant autonomy, and that parent education towards creating sensitive, accommodating environments could be appropriate, albeit with nuanced differences-of-opinion regarding the acceptability of specific therapeutic approaches. Participants generally endorsed the terms 'support' (vs 'intervention') and 'early-in-life' (vs 'at-risk'/'pre-emptive'). Engaging equal-power partnerships for the development, delivery of, and discourse around early-in-life autism supports will ensure end-user community values and needs are respected.Lay abstract Most support programmes for Autistic children are available only after they are diagnosed. Research suggests that parenting supports may be helpful for parents and their infants, when provided in the first 2 years of life - before a formal diagnosis is given, but when information suggests an infant is more likely to be Autistic. However, we do not know how acceptable these types of supports might be to the Autistic and autism communities. We asked 238 Autistic and non-autistic people - some of whom were parents, and some of whom were professionals working in research, health and education - about their perspectives on very-early supports. People generally agreed that it could be acceptable to work with parents to help them understand and support their child?s specific needs and unique ways of communicating. People suggested a variety of support strategies could be acceptable, including parent education, changing the environment to meet an infant?s needs, and creating opportunities for infants' to make choices and exercise control. People preferred respectful and accurate language - including the term 'support' (rather than 'intervention') and 'early-in-life' (rather than 'at-risk' of autism, or 'pre-emptive' when describing developmental stage). Continuing to work with community members will help to make sure autism support programmes are relevant and helpful. En ligne : https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/13623613241262077 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=566

Brief Report: Perceived Evidence and Use of Autism Intervention Strategies in Early Intervention Providers / Jessica PAYNTER in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 50-3 (March 2020)  

Public ISBD [article]  inJournal of Autism and Developmental Disorders > 50-3 (March 2020) . - p.1088-1094 Titre : Brief Report: Perceived Evidence and Use of Autism Intervention Strategies in Early Intervention Providers Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Jessica PAYNTER, Auteur ; Sarah LUSKIN-SAXBY, Auteur ; Deb KEEN, Auteur ; Kathryn FORDYCE, Auteur ; Grace FROST, Auteur ; Christine IMMS, Auteur ; Scott MILLER, Auteur ; Rebecca SUTHERLAND, Auteur ; David TREMBATH, Auteur ; Madonna TUCKER, Auteur ; Ullrich ECKER, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.1088-1094 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Autism spectrum disorder  Debunking  Evidence-based practice  Knowledge translation  Misinformation Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Use of empirically unsupported practices is a challenge in the field of autism spectrum disorder (ASD). We explored whether attitudes and perceived evidence were linked to intended practice use in early intervention staff. Seventy-one participants completed ratings of the evidence base, current and future use of six ASD intervention practices, and reported attitudes to research and evidence-based practice. Participants reported greater use and rated the evidence base higher for the empirically supported practices. However, variability in accuracy of evidence base ratings was observed across individuals. Higher perceived evidence was linked to greater future use intentions for empirically supported and unsupported practices. The need for accurate information across practice types is highlighted. Self-report methodology limitations and future research directions are discussed. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10803-019-04332-2 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=420 [article] Brief Report: Perceived Evidence and Use of Autism Intervention Strategies in Early Intervention Providers [texte imprimé] / Jessica PAYNTER, Auteur ; Sarah LUSKIN-SAXBY, Auteur ; Deb KEEN, Auteur ; Kathryn FORDYCE, Auteur ; Grace FROST, Auteur ; Christine IMMS, Auteur ; Scott MILLER, Auteur ; Rebecca SUTHERLAND, Auteur ; David TREMBATH, Auteur ; Madonna TUCKER, Auteur ; Ullrich ECKER, Auteur . - p.1088-1094. Langues : Anglais (eng) in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders > 50-3 (March 2020) . - p.1088-1094 Mots-clés : Autism spectrum disorder  Debunking  Evidence-based practice  Knowledge translation  Misinformation Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Use of empirically unsupported practices is a challenge in the field of autism spectrum disorder (ASD). We explored whether attitudes and perceived evidence were linked to intended practice use in early intervention staff. Seventy-one participants completed ratings of the evidence base, current and future use of six ASD intervention practices, and reported attitudes to research and evidence-based practice. Participants reported greater use and rated the evidence base higher for the empirically supported practices. However, variability in accuracy of evidence base ratings was observed across individuals. Higher perceived evidence was linked to greater future use intentions for empirically supported and unsupported practices. The need for accurate information across practice types is highlighted. Self-report methodology limitations and future research directions are discussed. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10803-019-04332-2 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=420

Clinician Proposed Predictors of Spoken Language Outcomes for Minimally Verbal Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder / David TREMBATH in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 51-2 (February 2021)  

Public ISBD [article]  inJournal of Autism and Developmental Disorders > 51-2 (February 2021) . - p.564-575 Titre : Clinician Proposed Predictors of Spoken Language Outcomes for Minimally Verbal Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : David TREMBATH, Auteur ; Rebecca SUTHERLAND, Auteur ; Teena CAITHNESS, Auteur ; Cheryl DISSANAYAKE, Auteur ; Valsamma EAPEN, Auteur ; Kathryn FORDYCE, Auteur ; Grace FROST, Auteur ; Teresa IACONO, Auteur ; Nicole MAHLER, Auteur ; Anne MASI, Auteur ; Jessica PAYNTER, Auteur ; Katherine PYE, Auteur ; Sheena REILLY, Auteur ; Veronica ROSE, Auteur ; Stephanie SIEVERS, Auteur ; Abirami THIRUMANICKAM, Auteur ; Marleen F. WESTERVELD, Auteur ; Madonna TUCKER, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.564-575 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Autism  Communication  Minimally verbal  Predictor  Speech pathology Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Our aim was to explore insights from clinical practice that may inform efforts to understand and account for factors that predict spoken language outcomes for children with Autism Spectrum Disorder who use minimal verbal language. We used a qualitative design involving three focus groups with 14 speech pathologists to explore their views and experiences. Using the Framework Method of analysis, we identified 9 themes accounting for 183 different participant references to potential factors. Participants highlighted the relevance of clusters of fine-grained social, communication, and learning behaviours, including novel insights into prelinguistic vocal behaviours. The participants suggested the potential value of dynamic assessment in predicting spoken language outcomes. The findings can inform efforts to developing clinically relevant methods for predicting children's communication outcomes. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10803-020-04550-z Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=440 [article] Clinician Proposed Predictors of Spoken Language Outcomes for Minimally Verbal Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder [texte imprimé] / David TREMBATH, Auteur ; Rebecca SUTHERLAND, Auteur ; Teena CAITHNESS, Auteur ; Cheryl DISSANAYAKE, Auteur ; Valsamma EAPEN, Auteur ; Kathryn FORDYCE, Auteur ; Grace FROST, Auteur ; Teresa IACONO, Auteur ; Nicole MAHLER, Auteur ; Anne MASI, Auteur ; Jessica PAYNTER, Auteur ; Katherine PYE, Auteur ; Sheena REILLY, Auteur ; Veronica ROSE, Auteur ; Stephanie SIEVERS, Auteur ; Abirami THIRUMANICKAM, Auteur ; Marleen F. WESTERVELD, Auteur ; Madonna TUCKER, Auteur . - p.564-575. Langues : Anglais (eng) in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders > 51-2 (February 2021) . - p.564-575 Mots-clés : Autism  Communication  Minimally verbal  Predictor  Speech pathology Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Our aim was to explore insights from clinical practice that may inform efforts to understand and account for factors that predict spoken language outcomes for children with Autism Spectrum Disorder who use minimal verbal language. We used a qualitative design involving three focus groups with 14 speech pathologists to explore their views and experiences. Using the Framework Method of analysis, we identified 9 themes accounting for 183 different participant references to potential factors. Participants highlighted the relevance of clusters of fine-grained social, communication, and learning behaviours, including novel insights into prelinguistic vocal behaviours. The participants suggested the potential value of dynamic assessment in predicting spoken language outcomes. The findings can inform efforts to developing clinically relevant methods for predicting children's communication outcomes. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10803-020-04550-z Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=440

Correction to: Spoken Language Change in Children on the Autism Spectrum Receiving Community-Based Interventions / David TREMBATH ; Matt Stainer ; Teena CAITHNESS ; Cheryl DISSANAYAKE ; Valsamma EAPEN ; Kathryn FORDYCE ; Veronica FREWER ; Grace FROST ; Kristelle HUDRY ; Teresa IACONO ; Nicole MAHLER ; Anne MASI ; Jessica PAYNTER ; Katherine PYE ; Shannon Quan ; Leanne Shellshear ; Rebecca SUTHERLAND ; Stephanie SIEVERS ; Abirami THIRUMANICKAM ; Marleen F. WESTERVELD ; Madonna TUCKER in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 53-6 (June 2023)  

Public ISBD [article]  inJournal of Autism and Developmental Disorders > 53-6 (June 2023) . - p.2548-2548 Titre : Correction to: Spoken Language Change in Children on the Autism Spectrum Receiving Community-Based Interventions : Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : David TREMBATH, Auteur ; Matt Stainer, Auteur ; Teena CAITHNESS, Auteur ; Cheryl DISSANAYAKE, Auteur ; Valsamma EAPEN, Auteur ; Kathryn FORDYCE, Auteur ; Veronica FREWER, Auteur ; Grace FROST, Auteur ; Kristelle HUDRY, Auteur ; Teresa IACONO, Auteur ; Nicole MAHLER, Auteur ; Anne MASI, Auteur ; Jessica PAYNTER, Auteur ; Katherine PYE, Auteur ; Shannon Quan, Auteur ; Leanne Shellshear, Auteur ; Rebecca SUTHERLAND, Auteur ; Stephanie SIEVERS, Auteur ; Abirami THIRUMANICKAM, Auteur ; Marleen F. WESTERVELD, Auteur ; Madonna TUCKER, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.2548-2548 Langues : Anglais (eng) Index. décimale : PER Périodiques En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-022-05633-9 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=506 [article] Correction to: Spoken Language Change in Children on the Autism Spectrum Receiving Community-Based Interventions : Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders [texte imprimé] / David TREMBATH, Auteur ; Matt Stainer, Auteur ; Teena CAITHNESS, Auteur ; Cheryl DISSANAYAKE, Auteur ; Valsamma EAPEN, Auteur ; Kathryn FORDYCE, Auteur ; Veronica FREWER, Auteur ; Grace FROST, Auteur ; Kristelle HUDRY, Auteur ; Teresa IACONO, Auteur ; Nicole MAHLER, Auteur ; Anne MASI, Auteur ; Jessica PAYNTER, Auteur ; Katherine PYE, Auteur ; Shannon Quan, Auteur ; Leanne Shellshear, Auteur ; Rebecca SUTHERLAND, Auteur ; Stephanie SIEVERS, Auteur ; Abirami THIRUMANICKAM, Auteur ; Marleen F. WESTERVELD, Auteur ; Madonna TUCKER, Auteur . - p.2548-2548. Langues : Anglais (eng) in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders > 53-6 (June 2023) . - p.2548-2548 Index. décimale : PER Périodiques En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-022-05633-9 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=506

Spoken Language Change in Children on the Autism Spectrum Receiving Community-Based Interventions / David TREMBATH ; Matt Stainer ; Teena CAITHNESS ; Cheryl DISSANAYAKE ; Valsamma EAPEN ; Kathryn FORDYCE ; Veronica FREWER ; Grace FROST ; Kristelle HUDRY ; Teresa IACONO ; Nicole MAHLER ; Anne MASI ; Jessica PAYNTER ; Katherine PYE ; Shannon Quan ; Leanne Shellshear ; Rebecca SUTHERLAND ; Stephanie SIEVERS ; Abirami THIRUMANICKAM ; Marleen F. WESTERVELD ; Madonna TUCKER in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 53-6 (June 2023)  

Permalink

Utilisation of evidence-based practices by ASD early intervention service providers / Jessica M. PAYNTER in Autism, 21-2 (February 2017)  

Permalink

---

1 (1 - 7 / 7) Par page : 25 50 100 200