Brief Report: Response to Joint Attention and Object Imitation as Predictors of Expressive and Receptive Language Growth Rate in Young Children on the Autism Spectrum / Kyle M. FROST in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 54-3 (March 2024)  

Public ISBD [article]  inJournal of Autism and Developmental Disorders > 54-3 (March 2024) . - p.1213-1220 Titre : Brief Report: Response to Joint Attention and Object Imitation as Predictors of Expressive and Receptive Language Growth Rate in Young Children on the Autism Spectrum Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Kyle M. FROST, Auteur ; Anamiguel POMALES-RAMOS, Auteur ; Brooke R. INGERSOLL, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.1213-1220 Langues : Anglais (eng) Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Joint attention and imitation are thought to facilitate a developmental cascade of language and social communication skills. Delays in developing these skills may affect the quality of children s social interactions and subsequent language development. We examined how responding to joint attention and object imitation skills predicted rate of expressive and receptive communication growth rate in a heterogeneous sample of autistic children. Children s baseline skills in responding to joint attention uniquely predicted expressive, but not receptive, language growth rate over time, while object imitation did not significantly predict language growth rate over and above joint attention skills. Future research should examine the potential moderating roles of child age and developmental level in explaining associations between joint attention and object imitation and later language development. En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-022-05567-2 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=524 [article] Brief Report: Response to Joint Attention and Object Imitation as Predictors of Expressive and Receptive Language Growth Rate in Young Children on the Autism Spectrum [texte imprimé] / Kyle M. FROST, Auteur ; Anamiguel POMALES-RAMOS, Auteur ; Brooke R. INGERSOLL, Auteur . - p.1213-1220. Langues : Anglais (eng) in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders > 54-3 (March 2024) . - p.1213-1220 Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Joint attention and imitation are thought to facilitate a developmental cascade of language and social communication skills. Delays in developing these skills may affect the quality of children s social interactions and subsequent language development. We examined how responding to joint attention and object imitation skills predicted rate of expressive and receptive communication growth rate in a heterogeneous sample of autistic children. Children s baseline skills in responding to joint attention uniquely predicted expressive, but not receptive, language growth rate over time, while object imitation did not significantly predict language growth rate over and above joint attention skills. Future research should examine the potential moderating roles of child age and developmental level in explaining associations between joint attention and object imitation and later language development. En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-022-05567-2 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=524

Examining the use of implementation science in autism intervention research: A scoping review / James D. LEE in Autism, 29-12 (December 2025)  

Public ISBD [article]  inAutism > 29-12 (December 2025) . - p.2911-2926 Titre : Examining the use of implementation science in autism intervention research: A scoping review Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : James D. LEE, Auteur ; Adriana Kaori TEROL, Auteur ; Jessica E. TSCHIDA, Auteur ; Anamiguel POMALES-RAMOS, Auteur ; Scott MCEATHRON, Auteur ; Anna WALLISCH, Auteur ; Brian A. BOYD, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.2911-2926 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : autism intervention  framework  implementation science  outcomes  strategies Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Although the field of autism intervention has strived to identify evidence-based practices, translating these interventions into real-world settings remains a significant challenge. This gap particularly impacts marginalized communities, where access to and quality of services are often inferior. Implementation science addresses these gaps by promoting the adoption and integration of evidence-based practices in community-based settings, thereby helping reduce disparities. While various frameworks and strategies have emerged to guide the successful implementation of autism evidence-based practices, the application of implementation science within autism intervention research remains underexplored. To address this gap, we conducted this scoping review that included 13 studies to examine how implementation science is applied in autism intervention research delivered in community-based settings. Specifically, we aimed to (1) describe the characteristics of implementation-focused studies (e.g. study design, participant types, intervention contexts); (2) examine how implementation frameworks, strategies, and outcomes were used to guide and evaluate intervention efforts; and (3) analyze how studies align with phases of the autism-specific implementation framework developed by Boyd et al. (Autism). Most studies were conducted in school settings. Fidelity was the most frequently assessed implementation outcome, while acceptability, adoption, and appropriateness were also commonly measured. Nearly all studies focused on early-phase implementation (e.g. exploration, initial implementation), with limited attention to sustainment or scale-up. The findings offer a starting point for future research to better implement autism evidence-based practices in community settings.Lay Abstract This study looks at ways to improve how autism support programs are used in everyday community settings like schools and clinics. These programs are approaches that research has shown can help autistic individuals develop important skills, such as communication, social interaction, and managing behavior. Many of these are psychosocial programs, which means they focus on emotional, social, and behavioral support rather than medication or medical treatment. However, there is a challenge in implementing these interventions in real-world settings, especially in marginalized communities where services are often lacking or lower in quality. The field of implementation science helps bridge this gap by guiding and encouraging the use of evidence-based practices in community settings, aiming to reduce disparities. To better understand this, we did a scoping review that included 13 studies that used implementation science to support autism interventions. We looked at what types of strategies were used, how success was measured, and how well the programs fit into the communities where they were used. Most of the studies took place in schools and involved teachers, school staff, or caregivers of autistic children-altogether including data from 3488 participants. These studies tested different programs to improve outcomes of autistic individuals, such as social skills, communication, and behavior in schools. En ligne : https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/13623613251351344 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=571 [article] Examining the use of implementation science in autism intervention research: A scoping review [texte imprimé] / James D. LEE, Auteur ; Adriana Kaori TEROL, Auteur ; Jessica E. TSCHIDA, Auteur ; Anamiguel POMALES-RAMOS, Auteur ; Scott MCEATHRON, Auteur ; Anna WALLISCH, Auteur ; Brian A. BOYD, Auteur . - p.2911-2926. Langues : Anglais (eng) in Autism > 29-12 (December 2025) . - p.2911-2926 Mots-clés : autism intervention  framework  implementation science  outcomes  strategies Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Although the field of autism intervention has strived to identify evidence-based practices, translating these interventions into real-world settings remains a significant challenge. This gap particularly impacts marginalized communities, where access to and quality of services are often inferior. Implementation science addresses these gaps by promoting the adoption and integration of evidence-based practices in community-based settings, thereby helping reduce disparities. While various frameworks and strategies have emerged to guide the successful implementation of autism evidence-based practices, the application of implementation science within autism intervention research remains underexplored. To address this gap, we conducted this scoping review that included 13 studies to examine how implementation science is applied in autism intervention research delivered in community-based settings. Specifically, we aimed to (1) describe the characteristics of implementation-focused studies (e.g. study design, participant types, intervention contexts); (2) examine how implementation frameworks, strategies, and outcomes were used to guide and evaluate intervention efforts; and (3) analyze how studies align with phases of the autism-specific implementation framework developed by Boyd et al. (Autism). Most studies were conducted in school settings. Fidelity was the most frequently assessed implementation outcome, while acceptability, adoption, and appropriateness were also commonly measured. Nearly all studies focused on early-phase implementation (e.g. exploration, initial implementation), with limited attention to sustainment or scale-up. The findings offer a starting point for future research to better implement autism evidence-based practices in community settings.Lay Abstract This study looks at ways to improve how autism support programs are used in everyday community settings like schools and clinics. These programs are approaches that research has shown can help autistic individuals develop important skills, such as communication, social interaction, and managing behavior. Many of these are psychosocial programs, which means they focus on emotional, social, and behavioral support rather than medication or medical treatment. However, there is a challenge in implementing these interventions in real-world settings, especially in marginalized communities where services are often lacking or lower in quality. The field of implementation science helps bridge this gap by guiding and encouraging the use of evidence-based practices in community settings, aiming to reduce disparities. To better understand this, we did a scoping review that included 13 studies that used implementation science to support autism interventions. We looked at what types of strategies were used, how success was measured, and how well the programs fit into the communities where they were used. Most of the studies took place in schools and involved teachers, school staff, or caregivers of autistic children-altogether including data from 3488 participants. These studies tested different programs to improve outcomes of autistic individuals, such as social skills, communication, and behavior in schools. En ligne : https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/13623613251351344 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=571

A method for defining the CORE of a psychosocial intervention to guide adaptation in practice: Reciprocal imitation teaching as a case example / Sarah R. EDMUNDS in Autism, 26-3 (April 2022)  

Public ISBD [article]  inAutism > 26-3 (April 2022) . - p.601-614 Titre : A method for defining the CORE of a psychosocial intervention to guide adaptation in practice: Reciprocal imitation teaching as a case example Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Sarah R. EDMUNDS, Auteur ; Kyle M. FROST, Auteur ; R. Christopher SHELDRICK, Auteur ; Alice BRAVO, Auteur ; Diondra STRAITON, Auteur ; Katherine PICKARD, Auteur ; Valerie GRIM, Auteur ; Amy DRAHOTA, Auteur ; Jocelyn KUHN, Auteur ; Gazi F. AZAD, Auteur ; Anamiguel POMALES-RAMOS, Auteur ; Brooke R. INGERSOLL, Auteur ; Allison L. WAINER, Auteur ; Lisa V. IBANEZ, Auteur ; Wendy L. STONE, Auteur ; Alice S. CARTER, Auteur ; Sarabeth BRODER-FINGERT, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.601-614 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Autism Spectrum Disorder  Child  Child, Preschool  Communication  Humans  Imitative Behavior  Parents/psychology  Psychosocial Intervention  autism spectrum disorders  implementation science  intervention fidelity  interventions?psychosocial/behavioral  social cognition and social behavior Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Interventions that support social communication include several "components," or parts (e.g. strategies for working with children and families, targeting specific skills). Some of these components may be essential for the intervention to work, while others may be recommended or viewed as helpful but not necessary for the intervention to work. "Recommended" components are often described as "adaptable" because they can be changed to improve fit in different settings where interventions are offered or with different individuals. We need to understand which parts of an intervention are essential (and which are adaptable) when translating interventions from research to community settings, but it is challenging to do this before studying an intervention in the community. This article presents the CORE (COmponents & Rationales for Effectiveness) Fidelity Method-a new method for defining the essential components of evidence-based interventions-and applies it to a case example of Reciprocal Imitation Teaching, an intervention that parents are taught to deliver with their young children with social communication delays. The CORE Fidelity Method involves three steps: (1) gathering information from multiple sources; (2) integrating information from previous research and theory; and (3) drafting a CORE model for ongoing use. The benefits of using the CORE Fidelity Method may include: (1) improving consistency in intervention and research materials to help all providers emphasize the most important skills or strategies; (2) clarifying which parts of the intervention can be adapted; and (3) supporting future research that evaluates which intervention components work and how they work. En ligne : https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/13623613211064431 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=473 [article] A method for defining the CORE of a psychosocial intervention to guide adaptation in practice: Reciprocal imitation teaching as a case example [texte imprimé] / Sarah R. EDMUNDS, Auteur ; Kyle M. FROST, Auteur ; R. Christopher SHELDRICK, Auteur ; Alice BRAVO, Auteur ; Diondra STRAITON, Auteur ; Katherine PICKARD, Auteur ; Valerie GRIM, Auteur ; Amy DRAHOTA, Auteur ; Jocelyn KUHN, Auteur ; Gazi F. AZAD, Auteur ; Anamiguel POMALES-RAMOS, Auteur ; Brooke R. INGERSOLL, Auteur ; Allison L. WAINER, Auteur ; Lisa V. IBANEZ, Auteur ; Wendy L. STONE, Auteur ; Alice S. CARTER, Auteur ; Sarabeth BRODER-FINGERT, Auteur . - p.601-614. Langues : Anglais (eng) in Autism > 26-3 (April 2022) . - p.601-614 Mots-clés : Autism Spectrum Disorder  Child  Child, Preschool  Communication  Humans  Imitative Behavior  Parents/psychology  Psychosocial Intervention  autism spectrum disorders  implementation science  intervention fidelity  interventions?psychosocial/behavioral  social cognition and social behavior Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Interventions that support social communication include several "components," or parts (e.g. strategies for working with children and families, targeting specific skills). Some of these components may be essential for the intervention to work, while others may be recommended or viewed as helpful but not necessary for the intervention to work. "Recommended" components are often described as "adaptable" because they can be changed to improve fit in different settings where interventions are offered or with different individuals. We need to understand which parts of an intervention are essential (and which are adaptable) when translating interventions from research to community settings, but it is challenging to do this before studying an intervention in the community. This article presents the CORE (COmponents & Rationales for Effectiveness) Fidelity Method-a new method for defining the essential components of evidence-based interventions-and applies it to a case example of Reciprocal Imitation Teaching, an intervention that parents are taught to deliver with their young children with social communication delays. The CORE Fidelity Method involves three steps: (1) gathering information from multiple sources; (2) integrating information from previous research and theory; and (3) drafting a CORE model for ongoing use. The benefits of using the CORE Fidelity Method may include: (1) improving consistency in intervention and research materials to help all providers emphasize the most important skills or strategies; (2) clarifying which parts of the intervention can be adapted; and (3) supporting future research that evaluates which intervention components work and how they work. En ligne : https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/13623613211064431 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=473

Reported quality indicators and implementation outcomes of community partnership in autism intervention research: A systematic review / Jessica E. TSCHIDA in Autism Research, 17-2 (February 2024)  

Public ISBD [article]  inAutism Research > 17-2 (February 2024) . - p.215-233 Titre : Reported quality indicators and implementation outcomes of community partnership in autism intervention research: A systematic review Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Jessica E. TSCHIDA, Auteur ; James D. LEE, Auteur ; Anamiguel POMALES-RAMOS, Auteur ; Vivien KOO, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.215-233 Langues : Anglais (eng) Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Abstract There is minimal research on the quality of community partnerships in studies of interventions for autistic children. However, building high quality community engagement in autism intervention research may improve implementation outcomes. This systematic review examined studies that report community partnership in autism intervention research. A total of 135 articles were identified and 11 of these articles were included in the final review. Community partnership data were extracted using indicators from the conceptual framework for assessing research-practice partnerships (RPP; Henrick et al., Henrick et al., Assessing research-practice partnerships: Five dimensions of effectiveness, William T. Grant Foundation, 2017) and implementation outcomes data were extracted using the taxonomy of distinct implementation outcomes (Proctor et al., Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 38:65-76, 2011). Quality of studies were appraised using JBIs critical appraisal tools (Munn et al., JBI Evidence Synthesis, 18:2127-2133, 2020). RPP indicators and implementation outcomes were variably reported across studies. RPP indicators and implementation outcomes more likely to be reported were related to building trust, cultivating partnership relationships, conducting rigorous research to inform action, acceptability, and feasibility. RPP indicators and implementation outcomes less likely to be reported were related to building capacity to engage in partnership work, sustainability, cost, and penetration. Together, these results may suggest the need for increased sustainability and capacity building efforts in partnerships and increased guidelines for reporting outcomes. En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1002/aur.3103 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=522 [article] Reported quality indicators and implementation outcomes of community partnership in autism intervention research: A systematic review [texte imprimé] / Jessica E. TSCHIDA, Auteur ; James D. LEE, Auteur ; Anamiguel POMALES-RAMOS, Auteur ; Vivien KOO, Auteur . - p.215-233. Langues : Anglais (eng) in Autism Research > 17-2 (February 2024) . - p.215-233 Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Abstract There is minimal research on the quality of community partnerships in studies of interventions for autistic children. However, building high quality community engagement in autism intervention research may improve implementation outcomes. This systematic review examined studies that report community partnership in autism intervention research. A total of 135 articles were identified and 11 of these articles were included in the final review. Community partnership data were extracted using indicators from the conceptual framework for assessing research-practice partnerships (RPP; Henrick et al., Henrick et al., Assessing research-practice partnerships: Five dimensions of effectiveness, William T. Grant Foundation, 2017) and implementation outcomes data were extracted using the taxonomy of distinct implementation outcomes (Proctor et al., Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 38:65-76, 2011). Quality of studies were appraised using JBIs critical appraisal tools (Munn et al., JBI Evidence Synthesis, 18:2127-2133, 2020). RPP indicators and implementation outcomes were variably reported across studies. RPP indicators and implementation outcomes more likely to be reported were related to building trust, cultivating partnership relationships, conducting rigorous research to inform action, acceptability, and feasibility. RPP indicators and implementation outcomes less likely to be reported were related to building capacity to engage in partnership work, sustainability, cost, and penetration. Together, these results may suggest the need for increased sustainability and capacity building efforts in partnerships and increased guidelines for reporting outcomes. En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1002/aur.3103 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=522

---

1 (1 - 4 / 4) Par page : 25 50 100 200