Childhood neurodevelopmental difficulties and risk of adolescent depression: the role of irritability / Olga EYRE in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 60-8 (August 2019)  

Public ISBD [article]  inJournal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 60-8 (August 2019) . - p.866-874 Titre : Childhood neurodevelopmental difficulties and risk of adolescent depression: the role of irritability Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Olga EYRE, Auteur ; Rachael A. HUGHES, Auteur ; Ajay K. THAPAR, Auteur ; Ellen LEIBENLUFT, Auteur ; Argyris STRINGARIS, Auteur ; George DAVEY SMITH, Auteur ; Evangelia STERGIAKOULI, Auteur ; Stephan COLLISHAW, Auteur ; Anita THAPAR, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.866-874 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Alspac  attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder  autism  depression  irritability  neurodevelopmental Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : BACKGROUND: Children with neurodevelopmental disorders are at increased risk of developing depression. Irritability predicts depression in the general population and is common in children with neurodevelopmental disorders. Thus, it is possible that irritability in children with neurodevelopmental disorders contributes to the link with later depression. This study aimed to (a) examine the association between childhood neurodevelopmental difficulties and adolescent depression and (b) test whether irritability explains this association. METHODS: Children with any neurodevelopmental difficulty at the age of 7-9 (n = 1,697) and a selected, comparison group without any neurodevelopmental difficulty (n = 3,177) were identified from a prospective, UK population-based cohort, the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children. Neurodevelopmental difficulties were defined as a score in the bottom 5% of the sample on at least one measure of cognitive ability, communication, autism spectrum symptoms, attention-deficit/hyperactivity symptoms, reading or motor coordination. The Development and Well-Being Assessment measured parent-reported child irritability at the age of 7, parent-reported adolescent depression at the age of 10 and 13, and self-reported depression at the age of 15. Depression measures were combined, deriving an outcome of major depressive disorder (MDD) in adolescence. Logistic regression examined the association between childhood neurodevelopmental difficulties and adolescent MDD, controlling for gender. Path analysis estimated the proportion of this association explained by irritability. Analyses were repeated for individual neurodevelopmental problems. RESULTS: Childhood neurodevelopmental difficulties were associated with adolescent MDD (OR = 2.11, 95% CI = 1.24, 3.60, p = .006). Childhood irritability statistically accounted for 42% of this association. On examining each neurodevelopmental difficulty separately, autistic, communication and ADHD problems were each associated with depression, with irritability explaining 29%-51% of these links. CONCLUSIONS: Childhood irritability appears to be a key contributor to the link between childhood neurodevelopmental difficulties and adolescent MDD. High rates of irritability in children with autistic and ADHD difficulties may explain elevated rates of depression in the neurodevelopmental group. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.13053 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=404 [article] Childhood neurodevelopmental difficulties and risk of adolescent depression: the role of irritability [texte imprimé] / Olga EYRE, Auteur ; Rachael A. HUGHES, Auteur ; Ajay K. THAPAR, Auteur ; Ellen LEIBENLUFT, Auteur ; Argyris STRINGARIS, Auteur ; George DAVEY SMITH, Auteur ; Evangelia STERGIAKOULI, Auteur ; Stephan COLLISHAW, Auteur ; Anita THAPAR, Auteur . - p.866-874. Langues : Anglais (eng) in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 60-8 (August 2019) . - p.866-874 Mots-clés : Alspac  attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder  autism  depression  irritability  neurodevelopmental Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : BACKGROUND: Children with neurodevelopmental disorders are at increased risk of developing depression. Irritability predicts depression in the general population and is common in children with neurodevelopmental disorders. Thus, it is possible that irritability in children with neurodevelopmental disorders contributes to the link with later depression. This study aimed to (a) examine the association between childhood neurodevelopmental difficulties and adolescent depression and (b) test whether irritability explains this association. METHODS: Children with any neurodevelopmental difficulty at the age of 7-9 (n = 1,697) and a selected, comparison group without any neurodevelopmental difficulty (n = 3,177) were identified from a prospective, UK population-based cohort, the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children. Neurodevelopmental difficulties were defined as a score in the bottom 5% of the sample on at least one measure of cognitive ability, communication, autism spectrum symptoms, attention-deficit/hyperactivity symptoms, reading or motor coordination. The Development and Well-Being Assessment measured parent-reported child irritability at the age of 7, parent-reported adolescent depression at the age of 10 and 13, and self-reported depression at the age of 15. Depression measures were combined, deriving an outcome of major depressive disorder (MDD) in adolescence. Logistic regression examined the association between childhood neurodevelopmental difficulties and adolescent MDD, controlling for gender. Path analysis estimated the proportion of this association explained by irritability. Analyses were repeated for individual neurodevelopmental problems. RESULTS: Childhood neurodevelopmental difficulties were associated with adolescent MDD (OR = 2.11, 95% CI = 1.24, 3.60, p = .006). Childhood irritability statistically accounted for 42% of this association. On examining each neurodevelopmental difficulty separately, autistic, communication and ADHD problems were each associated with depression, with irritability explaining 29%-51% of these links. CONCLUSIONS: Childhood irritability appears to be a key contributor to the link between childhood neurodevelopmental difficulties and adolescent MDD. High rates of irritability in children with autistic and ADHD difficulties may explain elevated rates of depression in the neurodevelopmental group. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.13053 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=404

Developing and validating a prediction model of adolescent major depressive disorder in the offspring of depressed parents / Alice STEPHENS in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 64-3 (March 2023)  

Public ISBD [article]  inJournal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 64-3 (March 2023) . - p.367-375 Titre : Developing and validating a prediction model of adolescent major depressive disorder in the offspring of depressed parents Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Alice STEPHENS, Auteur ; Judith ALLARDYCE, Auteur ; Bryony WEAVERS, Auteur ; Jessica LENNON, Auteur ; Rhys BEVAN JONES, Auteur ; Victoria POWELL, Auteur ; Olga EYRE, Auteur ; Robert POTTER, Auteur ; Valentina ESCOTT PRICE, Auteur ; David OSBORN, Auteur ; Anita THAPAR, Auteur ; Stephan COLLISHAW, Auteur ; Ajay K. THAPAR, Auteur ; Jon HERON, Auteur ; Frances RICE, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.367-375 Langues : Anglais (eng) Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Background Parental depression is common and is a major risk factor for depression in adolescents. Early identification of adolescents at elevated risk of developing major depressive disorder (MDD) in this group could improve early access to preventive interventions. Methods Using longitudinal data from 337 adolescents at high familial risk of depression, we developed a risk prediction model for adolescent MDD. The model was externally validated in an independent cohort of 1,384 adolescents at high familial risk. We assessed predictors at baseline and MDD at follow-up (a median of 2-3 years later). We compared the risk prediction model to a simple comparison model based on screening for depressive symptoms. Decision curve analysis was used to identify which model-predicted risk score thresholds were associated with the greatest clinical benefit. Results The MDD risk prediction model discriminated between those adolescents who did and did not develop MDD in the development (C-statistic=.783, IQR (interquartile range)=.779, .778) and the validation samples (C-statistic=.722, IQR=â’.694, .741). Calibration in the validation sample was good to excellent (calibration intercept=.011, C-slope=.851). The MDD risk prediction model was superior to the simple comparison model where discrimination was no better than chance (C-statistic=.544, IQR=.536, .572). Decision curve analysis found that the highest clinical utility was at the lowest risk score thresholds (0.01-0.05). Conclusions The developed risk prediction model successfully discriminated adolescents who developed MDD from those who did not. In practice, this model could be further developed with user involvement into a tool to target individuals for low-intensity, selective preventive intervention. En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.13704 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=493 [article] Developing and validating a prediction model of adolescent major depressive disorder in the offspring of depressed parents [texte imprimé] / Alice STEPHENS, Auteur ; Judith ALLARDYCE, Auteur ; Bryony WEAVERS, Auteur ; Jessica LENNON, Auteur ; Rhys BEVAN JONES, Auteur ; Victoria POWELL, Auteur ; Olga EYRE, Auteur ; Robert POTTER, Auteur ; Valentina ESCOTT PRICE, Auteur ; David OSBORN, Auteur ; Anita THAPAR, Auteur ; Stephan COLLISHAW, Auteur ; Ajay K. THAPAR, Auteur ; Jon HERON, Auteur ; Frances RICE, Auteur . - p.367-375. Langues : Anglais (eng) in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 64-3 (March 2023) . - p.367-375 Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Background Parental depression is common and is a major risk factor for depression in adolescents. Early identification of adolescents at elevated risk of developing major depressive disorder (MDD) in this group could improve early access to preventive interventions. Methods Using longitudinal data from 337 adolescents at high familial risk of depression, we developed a risk prediction model for adolescent MDD. The model was externally validated in an independent cohort of 1,384 adolescents at high familial risk. We assessed predictors at baseline and MDD at follow-up (a median of 2-3 years later). We compared the risk prediction model to a simple comparison model based on screening for depressive symptoms. Decision curve analysis was used to identify which model-predicted risk score thresholds were associated with the greatest clinical benefit. Results The MDD risk prediction model discriminated between those adolescents who did and did not develop MDD in the development (C-statistic=.783, IQR (interquartile range)=.779, .778) and the validation samples (C-statistic=.722, IQR=â’.694, .741). Calibration in the validation sample was good to excellent (calibration intercept=.011, C-slope=.851). The MDD risk prediction model was superior to the simple comparison model where discrimination was no better than chance (C-statistic=.544, IQR=.536, .572). Decision curve analysis found that the highest clinical utility was at the lowest risk score thresholds (0.01-0.05). Conclusions The developed risk prediction model successfully discriminated adolescents who developed MDD from those who did not. In practice, this model could be further developed with user involvement into a tool to target individuals for low-intensity, selective preventive intervention. En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.13704 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=493

Mapping phenotypic and genetic relationships among irritability, depression and ADHD in adolescence using network analysis / Amy SHAKESHAFT in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 67-3 (March 2026)  

Public ISBD [article]  inJournal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 67-3 (March 2026) . - p.333-343 Titre : Mapping phenotypic and genetic relationships among irritability, depression and ADHD in adolescence using network analysis Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Amy SHAKESHAFT, Auteur ; Luis C. FARHAT, Auteur ; Charlotte A. DENNISON, Auteur ; Olga EYRE, Auteur ; Olakunle OGINNI, Auteur ; Michael C. O'DONOVAN, Auteur ; Argyris STRINGARIS, Auteur ; Ellen LEIBENLUFT, Auteur ; Guilherme V. POLANCZYK, Auteur ; Lucy RIGLIN, Auteur ; Anita THAPAR, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.333-343 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Irritability  ADHD  depression  oppositional defiant disorder  comorbidity  genetics  ALSPAC Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Background Irritability is a common reason for referral to child and adolescent mental health services. However, debate exists as to whether irritability is best conceptualised and treated as a feature of mood disorder, oppositional defiant disorder or a core symptom of ADHD. Methods We use network analyses to examine the relationships between adolescent irritability, headstrong/hurtful ODD items, depression and ADHD phenotypes, and polygenic scores (PGS) for depression and ADHD using the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC). In primary analysis, irritability, depression, headstrong/hurtful ODD items and ADHD were defined using the Development and Well-Being Assessment (DAWBA) at age 15. In secondary analysis, phenotypes were defined using the Short Mood and Feelings Questionnaire (SMFQ) and the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) ADHD and behavioural subscales at age 13. Finally, we tested for network replicability using confirmatory network analysis in the Millennium Cohort Study (MCS). Results Results of network analyses using the DAWBA in ALSPAC indicated irritability was most strongly associated with headstrong/hurtful ODD items, followed by ADHD and depression. When including PGS, we observed an edge between irritability and depression PGS but not between irritability and ADHD PGS. Irritability appeared to be the primary pathway between ADHD and depression as well as between headstrong/hurtful ODD items and depression. Results were similar using SMFQ/SDQ in ALSPAC and confirmatory network analysis indicated excellent model fit in MCS. Conclusions Although irritability appears to be transdiagnostic, phenotypically, it was most strongly associated with headstrong/hurtful ODD items and broader behavioural problems, which favours the ICD-11 approach of including irritability as a specifier of ODD. However, irritability appeared to be a key connector between both ADHD and behavioural problems to depression; thus, is important to monitor and treat in affected youth with ADHD or behavioural problems. En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.70040 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=580 [article] Mapping phenotypic and genetic relationships among irritability, depression and ADHD in adolescence using network analysis [texte imprimé] / Amy SHAKESHAFT, Auteur ; Luis C. FARHAT, Auteur ; Charlotte A. DENNISON, Auteur ; Olga EYRE, Auteur ; Olakunle OGINNI, Auteur ; Michael C. O'DONOVAN, Auteur ; Argyris STRINGARIS, Auteur ; Ellen LEIBENLUFT, Auteur ; Guilherme V. POLANCZYK, Auteur ; Lucy RIGLIN, Auteur ; Anita THAPAR, Auteur . - p.333-343. Langues : Anglais (eng) in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 67-3 (March 2026) . - p.333-343 Mots-clés : Irritability  ADHD  depression  oppositional defiant disorder  comorbidity  genetics  ALSPAC Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Background Irritability is a common reason for referral to child and adolescent mental health services. However, debate exists as to whether irritability is best conceptualised and treated as a feature of mood disorder, oppositional defiant disorder or a core symptom of ADHD. Methods We use network analyses to examine the relationships between adolescent irritability, headstrong/hurtful ODD items, depression and ADHD phenotypes, and polygenic scores (PGS) for depression and ADHD using the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC). In primary analysis, irritability, depression, headstrong/hurtful ODD items and ADHD were defined using the Development and Well-Being Assessment (DAWBA) at age 15. In secondary analysis, phenotypes were defined using the Short Mood and Feelings Questionnaire (SMFQ) and the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) ADHD and behavioural subscales at age 13. Finally, we tested for network replicability using confirmatory network analysis in the Millennium Cohort Study (MCS). Results Results of network analyses using the DAWBA in ALSPAC indicated irritability was most strongly associated with headstrong/hurtful ODD items, followed by ADHD and depression. When including PGS, we observed an edge between irritability and depression PGS but not between irritability and ADHD PGS. Irritability appeared to be the primary pathway between ADHD and depression as well as between headstrong/hurtful ODD items and depression. Results were similar using SMFQ/SDQ in ALSPAC and confirmatory network analysis indicated excellent model fit in MCS. Conclusions Although irritability appears to be transdiagnostic, phenotypically, it was most strongly associated with headstrong/hurtful ODD items and broader behavioural problems, which favours the ICD-11 approach of including irritability as a specifier of ODD. However, irritability appeared to be a key connector between both ADHD and behavioural problems to depression; thus, is important to monitor and treat in affected youth with ADHD or behavioural problems. En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.70040 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=580

Practitioner Review: Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder and autism spectrum disorder - the importance of depression / Anita THAPAR in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 64-1 (January 2023)  

Public ISBD [article]  inJournal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 64-1 (January 2023) . - p.4-15 Titre : Practitioner Review: Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder and autism spectrum disorder - the importance of depression Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Anita THAPAR, Auteur ; Lucy A. LIVINGSTON, Auteur ; Olga EYRE, Auteur ; Lucy RIGLIN, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.4-15 Langues : Anglais (eng) Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Young people with neurodevelopmental disorders, such as attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and autism spectrum disorder (ASD), show high rates of mental health problems, of which depression is one of the most common. Given that depression in ASD and ADHD is linked with a range of poor outcomes, knowledge of how clinicians should assess, identify and treat depression in the context of these neurodevelopmental disorders is much needed. Here, we give an overview of the latest research on depression in young people with ADHD and ASD, including possible mechanisms underlying the link between ADHD/ASD and depression, as well as the presentation, assessment and treatment of depression in these neurodevelopmental disorders. We discuss the implications for clinicians and make recommendations for critical future research in this area. En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.13678 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=490 [article] Practitioner Review: Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder and autism spectrum disorder - the importance of depression [texte imprimé] / Anita THAPAR, Auteur ; Lucy A. LIVINGSTON, Auteur ; Olga EYRE, Auteur ; Lucy RIGLIN, Auteur . - p.4-15. Langues : Anglais (eng) in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 64-1 (January 2023) . - p.4-15 Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Young people with neurodevelopmental disorders, such as attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and autism spectrum disorder (ASD), show high rates of mental health problems, of which depression is one of the most common. Given that depression in ASD and ADHD is linked with a range of poor outcomes, knowledge of how clinicians should assess, identify and treat depression in the context of these neurodevelopmental disorders is much needed. Here, we give an overview of the latest research on depression in young people with ADHD and ASD, including possible mechanisms underlying the link between ADHD/ASD and depression, as well as the presentation, assessment and treatment of depression in these neurodevelopmental disorders. We discuss the implications for clinicians and make recommendations for critical future research in this area. En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.13678 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=490

Practitioner Review: What have we learnt about the causes of ADHD? / Anita THAPAR in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 54-1 (January 2013)  

Public ISBD [article]  inJournal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 54-1 (January 2013) . - 3-16 Titre : Practitioner Review: What have we learnt about the causes of ADHD? Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Anita THAPAR, Auteur ; Miriam COOPER, Auteur ; Olga EYRE, Auteur ; Kate LANGLEY, Auteur Article en page(s) : 3-16 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : ADHD  genetics  risk factors  perinatal  prenatal  aetiology  environmental?gene interactions Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Background: Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and its possible causes still attract controversy. Genes, pre and perinatal risks, psychosocial factors and environmental toxins have all been considered as potential risk factors. Method: This review (focussing on literature published since 1997, selected from a search of PubMed) critically considers putative risk factors with a focus on genetics and selected environmental risks, examines their relationships with ADHD and discusses the likelihood that these risks are causal as well as some of the main implications. Results: No single risk factor explains ADHD. Both inherited and noninherited factors contribute and their effects are interdependent. ADHD is familial and heritable. Research into the inherited and molecular genetic contributions to ADHD suggest an important overlap with other neurodevelopmental problems, notably, autism spectrum disorders. Having a biological relative with ADHD, large, rare copy number variants, some small effect size candidate gene variants, extreme early adversity, pre and postnatal exposure to lead and low birth weight/prematurity have been most consistently found as risk factors, but none are yet known to be definitely causal. There is a large literature documenting associations between ADHD and a wide variety of putative environmental risks that can, at present, only be regarded as correlates. Findings from research designs that go beyond simply testing for association are beginning to contest the robustness of some environmental exposures previously thought to be ADHD risk factors. Conclusions: The genetic risks implicated in ADHD generally tend to have small effect sizes or be rare and often increase risk of many other types of psychopathology. Thus, they cannot be used for prediction, genetic testing or diagnostic purposes beyond what is predicted by a family history. There is a need to consider the possibility of parents and siblings being similarly affected and how this might impact on engagement with families, influence interventions and require integration with adult services. Genetic contributions to disorder do not necessarily mean that medications are the treatment of choice. We also consider how findings might influence the conceptualisation of ADHD, public health policy implications and why it is unhelpful and incorrect to dichotomise genetic/biological and environmental explanations. It is essential that practitioners can interpret genetic and aetiological research findings and impart informed explanations to families. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2012.02611.x Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=186 [article] Practitioner Review: What have we learnt about the causes of ADHD? [texte imprimé] / Anita THAPAR, Auteur ; Miriam COOPER, Auteur ; Olga EYRE, Auteur ; Kate LANGLEY, Auteur . - 3-16. Langues : Anglais (eng) in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 54-1 (January 2013) . - 3-16 Mots-clés : ADHD  genetics  risk factors  perinatal  prenatal  aetiology  environmental?gene interactions Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Background: Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and its possible causes still attract controversy. Genes, pre and perinatal risks, psychosocial factors and environmental toxins have all been considered as potential risk factors. Method: This review (focussing on literature published since 1997, selected from a search of PubMed) critically considers putative risk factors with a focus on genetics and selected environmental risks, examines their relationships with ADHD and discusses the likelihood that these risks are causal as well as some of the main implications. Results: No single risk factor explains ADHD. Both inherited and noninherited factors contribute and their effects are interdependent. ADHD is familial and heritable. Research into the inherited and molecular genetic contributions to ADHD suggest an important overlap with other neurodevelopmental problems, notably, autism spectrum disorders. Having a biological relative with ADHD, large, rare copy number variants, some small effect size candidate gene variants, extreme early adversity, pre and postnatal exposure to lead and low birth weight/prematurity have been most consistently found as risk factors, but none are yet known to be definitely causal. There is a large literature documenting associations between ADHD and a wide variety of putative environmental risks that can, at present, only be regarded as correlates. Findings from research designs that go beyond simply testing for association are beginning to contest the robustness of some environmental exposures previously thought to be ADHD risk factors. Conclusions: The genetic risks implicated in ADHD generally tend to have small effect sizes or be rare and often increase risk of many other types of psychopathology. Thus, they cannot be used for prediction, genetic testing or diagnostic purposes beyond what is predicted by a family history. There is a need to consider the possibility of parents and siblings being similarly affected and how this might impact on engagement with families, influence interventions and require integration with adult services. Genetic contributions to disorder do not necessarily mean that medications are the treatment of choice. We also consider how findings might influence the conceptualisation of ADHD, public health policy implications and why it is unhelpful and incorrect to dichotomise genetic/biological and environmental explanations. It is essential that practitioners can interpret genetic and aetiological research findings and impart informed explanations to families. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2012.02611.x Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=186

Sex-specific manifestation of genetic risk for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in the general population / Joanna MARTIN in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 59-8 (August 2018)  

Permalink

---

1 (1 - 6 / 6) Par page : 25 50 100 200