Centre d'Information et de documentation du CRA Rhône-Alpes
CRA
Informations pratiques
-
Adresse
Centre d'information et de documentation
du CRA Rhône-Alpes
Centre Hospitalier le Vinatier
bât 211
95, Bd Pinel
69678 Bron CedexHoraires
Lundi au Vendredi
9h00-12h00 13h30-16h00Contact
Tél: +33(0)4 37 91 54 65
Mail
Fax: +33(0)4 37 91 54 37
-
Détail de l'auteur
Auteur Kristian ARENDT |
Documents disponibles écrits par cet auteur (2)
Faire une suggestion Affiner la recherche
Research Review: Recommendations for reporting on treatment trials for child and adolescent anxiety disorders - an international consensus statement / Cathy CRESWELL in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 62-3 (March 2021)
[article]
Titre : Research Review: Recommendations for reporting on treatment trials for child and adolescent anxiety disorders - an international consensus statement Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Cathy CRESWELL, Auteur ; Maaike H. NAUTA, Auteur ; Jennifer L. HUDSON, Auteur ; Sonja MARCH, Auteur ; Tessa REARDON, Auteur ; Kristian ARENDT, Auteur ; Denise H. M. BODDEN, Auteur ; Vanessa E. COBHAM, Auteur ; Caroline L. DONOVAN, Auteur ; Brynjar HALLDORSSON, Auteur ; Tina IN-ALBON, Auteur ; Shin-Ichi ISHIKAWA, Auteur ; Daniel Bach JOHNSEN, Auteur ; Maral JOLSTEDT, Auteur ; Rachel DE JONG, Auteur ; Leonie KREUZE, Auteur ; Lynn MOBACH, Auteur ; Ronald M RAPEE, Auteur ; Susan H. SPENCE, Auteur ; Mikael THASTUM, Auteur ; Elisabeth UTENS, Auteur ; Sarah VIGERLAND, Auteur ; Gro Janne WERGELAND, Auteur ; Cecilia A ESSAU, Auteur ; Anne Marie ALBANO, Auteur ; Brian CHU, Auteur ; Muniya KHANNA, Auteur ; Wendy K. SILVERMAN, Auteur ; Philip C. KENDALL, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.255-269 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Anxiety treatment trials Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : BACKGROUND: Anxiety disorders in children and young people are common and bring significant personal and societal costs. Over the last two decades, there has been a substantial increase in research evaluating psychological and pharmacological treatments for anxiety disorders in children and young people and exciting and novel research has continued as the field strives to improve efficacy and effectiveness, and accessibility of interventions. This increase in research brings potential to draw together data across studies to compare treatment approaches and advance understanding of what works, how, and for whom. There are challenges to these efforts due largely to variation in studies' outcome measures and variation in the way study characteristics are reported, making it difficult to compare and/or combine studies, and this is likely to lead to faulty conclusions. Studies particularly vary in their reliance on child, parent, and/or assessor-based ratings across a range of outcomes, including remission of anxiety diagnosis, symptom reduction, and other domains of functioning (e.g., family relationships, peer relationships). METHODS: To address these challenges, we convened a series of international activities that brought together the views of key stakeholders (i.e., researchers, mental health professionals, young people, parents/caregivers) to develop recommendations for outcome measurement to be used in treatment trials for anxiety disorders in children and young people. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: This article reports the results of these activities and offers recommendations for selection and reporting of outcome measures to (a) guide future research and (b) improve communication of what has been measured and reported. We offer these recommendations to promote international consistency in trial reporting and to enable the field to take full advantage of the great opportunities that come from data sharing going forward. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.13283 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=443
in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 62-3 (March 2021) . - p.255-269[article] Research Review: Recommendations for reporting on treatment trials for child and adolescent anxiety disorders - an international consensus statement [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Cathy CRESWELL, Auteur ; Maaike H. NAUTA, Auteur ; Jennifer L. HUDSON, Auteur ; Sonja MARCH, Auteur ; Tessa REARDON, Auteur ; Kristian ARENDT, Auteur ; Denise H. M. BODDEN, Auteur ; Vanessa E. COBHAM, Auteur ; Caroline L. DONOVAN, Auteur ; Brynjar HALLDORSSON, Auteur ; Tina IN-ALBON, Auteur ; Shin-Ichi ISHIKAWA, Auteur ; Daniel Bach JOHNSEN, Auteur ; Maral JOLSTEDT, Auteur ; Rachel DE JONG, Auteur ; Leonie KREUZE, Auteur ; Lynn MOBACH, Auteur ; Ronald M RAPEE, Auteur ; Susan H. SPENCE, Auteur ; Mikael THASTUM, Auteur ; Elisabeth UTENS, Auteur ; Sarah VIGERLAND, Auteur ; Gro Janne WERGELAND, Auteur ; Cecilia A ESSAU, Auteur ; Anne Marie ALBANO, Auteur ; Brian CHU, Auteur ; Muniya KHANNA, Auteur ; Wendy K. SILVERMAN, Auteur ; Philip C. KENDALL, Auteur . - p.255-269.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 62-3 (March 2021) . - p.255-269
Mots-clés : Anxiety treatment trials Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : BACKGROUND: Anxiety disorders in children and young people are common and bring significant personal and societal costs. Over the last two decades, there has been a substantial increase in research evaluating psychological and pharmacological treatments for anxiety disorders in children and young people and exciting and novel research has continued as the field strives to improve efficacy and effectiveness, and accessibility of interventions. This increase in research brings potential to draw together data across studies to compare treatment approaches and advance understanding of what works, how, and for whom. There are challenges to these efforts due largely to variation in studies' outcome measures and variation in the way study characteristics are reported, making it difficult to compare and/or combine studies, and this is likely to lead to faulty conclusions. Studies particularly vary in their reliance on child, parent, and/or assessor-based ratings across a range of outcomes, including remission of anxiety diagnosis, symptom reduction, and other domains of functioning (e.g., family relationships, peer relationships). METHODS: To address these challenges, we convened a series of international activities that brought together the views of key stakeholders (i.e., researchers, mental health professionals, young people, parents/caregivers) to develop recommendations for outcome measurement to be used in treatment trials for anxiety disorders in children and young people. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: This article reports the results of these activities and offers recommendations for selection and reporting of outcome measures to (a) guide future research and (b) improve communication of what has been measured and reported. We offer these recommendations to promote international consistency in trial reporting and to enable the field to take full advantage of the great opportunities that come from data sharing going forward. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.13283 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=443 The impact of treatment delivery format on response to cognitive behaviour therapy for preadolescent children with anxiety disorders / A. MCKINNON in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 59-7 (July 2018)
[article]
Titre : The impact of treatment delivery format on response to cognitive behaviour therapy for preadolescent children with anxiety disorders Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : A. MCKINNON, Auteur ; R. KEERS, Auteur ; J. R. I. COLEMAN, Auteur ; K. J. LESTER, Auteur ; S. ROBERTS, Auteur ; Kristian ARENDT, Auteur ; Susan M. BOGELS, Auteur ; Peter COOPER, Auteur ; C. CRESWELL, Auteur ; Catharina A. HARTMAN, Auteur ; K. W. FJERMESTAD, Auteur ; T. IN-ALBON, Auteur ; K. LAVALLEE, Auteur ; H. J. LYNEHAM, Auteur ; P. SMITH, Auteur ; R. MEISER-STEDMAN, Auteur ; M. H. NAUTA, Auteur ; R. M. RAPEE, Auteur ; Y. REY, Auteur ; S. SCHNEIDER, Auteur ; W. K. SILVERMAN, Auteur ; M. THASTUM, Auteur ; K. THIRLWALL, Auteur ; Gro Janne WERGELAND, Auteur ; T. C. ELEY, Auteur ; J. L. HUDSON, Auteur Année de publication : 2018 Article en page(s) : p.763-772 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Anxiety cognitive therapy treatment trials Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : BACKGROUND: Several delivery formats of cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) for child anxiety have been proposed, however, there is little consensus on the optimal delivery format. The primary goal of this study was to investigate the impact of the child's primary anxiety diagnosis on changes in clinical severity (of the primary problem) during individual CBT, group CBT and guided parent-led CBT. The secondary goal was to investigate the impact of the child's primary anxiety diagnosis on rates of remission for the three treatment formats. METHODS: A sample of 1,253 children (5-12 years; Mage = 9.3, SD = 1.7) was pooled from CBT trials carried out at 10 sites. Children had a primary diagnosis of generalised anxiety disorder (GAD), social anxiety disorder (SoAD), specific phobia (SP) or separation anxiety disorder (SAD). Children and parents completed a semistructured clinical interview to assess the presence and severity of DSM-IV psychiatric disorders at preintervention, postintervention and follow-up. Linear mixture modelling was used to evaluate the primary research question and logistic modelling was used to investigate the secondary research question. RESULTS: In children with primary GAD, SAD or SoAD, there were no significant differences between delivery formats. However, children with primary SP showed significantly larger reductions in clinical severity following individual CBT compared to group CBT and guided parent-led CBT. The results were mirrored in the analysis of remission responses with the exception that individual CBT was no longer superior to group CBT for children with a primary SP. The difference between individual and group was not significant when follow-up data were examined separately. CONCLUSIONS: Data show there may be greater clinical benefit by allocating children with a primary SP to individual CBT, although future research on cost-effectiveness is needed to determine whether the additional clinical benefits justify the additional resources required. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12872 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=368
in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 59-7 (July 2018) . - p.763-772[article] The impact of treatment delivery format on response to cognitive behaviour therapy for preadolescent children with anxiety disorders [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / A. MCKINNON, Auteur ; R. KEERS, Auteur ; J. R. I. COLEMAN, Auteur ; K. J. LESTER, Auteur ; S. ROBERTS, Auteur ; Kristian ARENDT, Auteur ; Susan M. BOGELS, Auteur ; Peter COOPER, Auteur ; C. CRESWELL, Auteur ; Catharina A. HARTMAN, Auteur ; K. W. FJERMESTAD, Auteur ; T. IN-ALBON, Auteur ; K. LAVALLEE, Auteur ; H. J. LYNEHAM, Auteur ; P. SMITH, Auteur ; R. MEISER-STEDMAN, Auteur ; M. H. NAUTA, Auteur ; R. M. RAPEE, Auteur ; Y. REY, Auteur ; S. SCHNEIDER, Auteur ; W. K. SILVERMAN, Auteur ; M. THASTUM, Auteur ; K. THIRLWALL, Auteur ; Gro Janne WERGELAND, Auteur ; T. C. ELEY, Auteur ; J. L. HUDSON, Auteur . - 2018 . - p.763-772.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 59-7 (July 2018) . - p.763-772
Mots-clés : Anxiety cognitive therapy treatment trials Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : BACKGROUND: Several delivery formats of cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) for child anxiety have been proposed, however, there is little consensus on the optimal delivery format. The primary goal of this study was to investigate the impact of the child's primary anxiety diagnosis on changes in clinical severity (of the primary problem) during individual CBT, group CBT and guided parent-led CBT. The secondary goal was to investigate the impact of the child's primary anxiety diagnosis on rates of remission for the three treatment formats. METHODS: A sample of 1,253 children (5-12 years; Mage = 9.3, SD = 1.7) was pooled from CBT trials carried out at 10 sites. Children had a primary diagnosis of generalised anxiety disorder (GAD), social anxiety disorder (SoAD), specific phobia (SP) or separation anxiety disorder (SAD). Children and parents completed a semistructured clinical interview to assess the presence and severity of DSM-IV psychiatric disorders at preintervention, postintervention and follow-up. Linear mixture modelling was used to evaluate the primary research question and logistic modelling was used to investigate the secondary research question. RESULTS: In children with primary GAD, SAD or SoAD, there were no significant differences between delivery formats. However, children with primary SP showed significantly larger reductions in clinical severity following individual CBT compared to group CBT and guided parent-led CBT. The results were mirrored in the analysis of remission responses with the exception that individual CBT was no longer superior to group CBT for children with a primary SP. The difference between individual and group was not significant when follow-up data were examined separately. CONCLUSIONS: Data show there may be greater clinical benefit by allocating children with a primary SP to individual CBT, although future research on cost-effectiveness is needed to determine whether the additional clinical benefits justify the additional resources required. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12872 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=368