Centre d'Information et de documentation du CRA Rhône-Alpes
CRA
Informations pratiques
-
Adresse
Centre d'information et de documentation
du CRA Rhône-Alpes
Centre Hospitalier le Vinatier
bât 211
95, Bd Pinel
69678 Bron CedexHoraires
Lundi au Vendredi
9h00-12h00 13h30-16h00Contact
Tél: +33(0)4 37 91 54 65
Mail
Fax: +33(0)4 37 91 54 37
-
Résultat de la recherche
2 recherche sur le mot-clé 'differential-susceptibility'
Affiner la recherche Générer le flux rss de la recherche
Partager le résultat de cette recherche Faire une suggestion
Distinguishing differential susceptibility, diathesis-stress, and vantage sensitivity: Beyond the single gene and environment model / Alexia JOLICOEUR-MARTINEAU in Development and Psychopathology, 32-1 (February 2020)
[article]
Titre : Distinguishing differential susceptibility, diathesis-stress, and vantage sensitivity: Beyond the single gene and environment model Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Alexia JOLICOEUR-MARTINEAU, Auteur ; Jay BELSKY, Auteur ; Eszter SZEKELY, Auteur ; Keith F. WIDAMAN, Auteur ; Michael PLUESS, Auteur ; Celia M. T. GREENWOOD, Auteur ; Ashley WAZANA, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.73-83 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : diathesis-stress differential-susceptibility gene-by-environment interaction regions of significance vantage sensitivity Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Currently, two main approaches exist to distinguish differential susceptibility from diathesis-stress and vantage sensitivity in Genotype x Environment interaction (G x E) research: regions of significance (RoS) and competitive-confirmatory approaches. Each is limited by its single-gene/single-environment foci given that most phenotypes are the product of multiple interacting genetic and environmental factors. We thus addressed these two concerns in a recently developed R package (LEGIT) for constructing G x E interaction models with latent genetic and environmental scores using alternating optimization. Herein we test, by means of computer simulation, diverse G x E models in the context of both single and multiple genes and environments. Results indicate that the RoS and competitive-confirmatory approaches were highly accurate when the sample size was large, whereas the latter performed better in small samples and for small effect sizes. The competitive-confirmatory approach generally had good accuracy (a) when effect size was moderate and N >/= 500 and (b) when effect size was large and N >/= 250, whereas RoS performed poorly. Computational tools to determine the type of G x E of multiple genes and environments are provided as extensions in our LEGIT R package. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0954579418001438 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=415
in Development and Psychopathology > 32-1 (February 2020) . - p.73-83[article] Distinguishing differential susceptibility, diathesis-stress, and vantage sensitivity: Beyond the single gene and environment model [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Alexia JOLICOEUR-MARTINEAU, Auteur ; Jay BELSKY, Auteur ; Eszter SZEKELY, Auteur ; Keith F. WIDAMAN, Auteur ; Michael PLUESS, Auteur ; Celia M. T. GREENWOOD, Auteur ; Ashley WAZANA, Auteur . - p.73-83.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Development and Psychopathology > 32-1 (February 2020) . - p.73-83
Mots-clés : diathesis-stress differential-susceptibility gene-by-environment interaction regions of significance vantage sensitivity Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Currently, two main approaches exist to distinguish differential susceptibility from diathesis-stress and vantage sensitivity in Genotype x Environment interaction (G x E) research: regions of significance (RoS) and competitive-confirmatory approaches. Each is limited by its single-gene/single-environment foci given that most phenotypes are the product of multiple interacting genetic and environmental factors. We thus addressed these two concerns in a recently developed R package (LEGIT) for constructing G x E interaction models with latent genetic and environmental scores using alternating optimization. Herein we test, by means of computer simulation, diverse G x E models in the context of both single and multiple genes and environments. Results indicate that the RoS and competitive-confirmatory approaches were highly accurate when the sample size was large, whereas the latter performed better in small samples and for small effect sizes. The competitive-confirmatory approach generally had good accuracy (a) when effect size was moderate and N >/= 500 and (b) when effect size was large and N >/= 250, whereas RoS performed poorly. Computational tools to determine the type of G x E of multiple genes and environments are provided as extensions in our LEGIT R package. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0954579418001438 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=415 Infant temperament, early-childhood parenting, and early-adolescent development: Testing alternative models of Parenting x Temperament interaction / Xiaoya ZHANG in Development and Psychopathology, 34-3 (August 2022)
[article]
Titre : Infant temperament, early-childhood parenting, and early-adolescent development: Testing alternative models of Parenting x Temperament interaction Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Xiaoya ZHANG, Auteur ; Kristina SAYLER, Auteur ; Sarah HARTMAN, Auteur ; Jay BELSKY, Auteur Année de publication : 2022 Article en page(s) : p.784-795 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : temperament-X-parenting interaction differential-susceptibility diathesis-stress re-parameterized model comparison ALSPAC Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Here we evaluate whether infant difficult temperament (6 months) functions as a vulnerability or more general plasticity factor when investigating effects of early-childhood parenting (8 “42 months) on both positive and negative early-adolescent socioemotional development (age 8 “11 years). Using data from the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC, N = 14,541) and a re-parameterized model-testing approach to distinguish alternative person × environment conceptual models, results indicated that temperament × parenting interacted in predicting externalizing (i.e., hyperactivity, conduct problems), but not other behavior (i.e., emotional symptoms, peer problems), in a (weak) differential susceptibility manner. While more and less supportive parenting predicted, respectively, fewer and more behavior problems, it did so more strongly for children who were more difficult as infants. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0954579420002096 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=484
in Development and Psychopathology > 34-3 (August 2022) . - p.784-795[article] Infant temperament, early-childhood parenting, and early-adolescent development: Testing alternative models of Parenting x Temperament interaction [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Xiaoya ZHANG, Auteur ; Kristina SAYLER, Auteur ; Sarah HARTMAN, Auteur ; Jay BELSKY, Auteur . - 2022 . - p.784-795.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Development and Psychopathology > 34-3 (August 2022) . - p.784-795
Mots-clés : temperament-X-parenting interaction differential-susceptibility diathesis-stress re-parameterized model comparison ALSPAC Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Here we evaluate whether infant difficult temperament (6 months) functions as a vulnerability or more general plasticity factor when investigating effects of early-childhood parenting (8 “42 months) on both positive and negative early-adolescent socioemotional development (age 8 “11 years). Using data from the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC, N = 14,541) and a re-parameterized model-testing approach to distinguish alternative person × environment conceptual models, results indicated that temperament × parenting interacted in predicting externalizing (i.e., hyperactivity, conduct problems), but not other behavior (i.e., emotional symptoms, peer problems), in a (weak) differential susceptibility manner. While more and less supportive parenting predicted, respectively, fewer and more behavior problems, it did so more strongly for children who were more difficult as infants. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0954579420002096 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=484