Centre d'Information et de documentation du CRA Rhône-Alpes
CRA
Informations pratiques
-
Adresse
Centre d'information et de documentation
du CRA Rhône-Alpes
Centre Hospitalier le Vinatier
bât 211
95, Bd Pinel
69678 Bron CedexHoraires
Lundi au Vendredi
9h00-12h00 13h30-16h00Contact
Tél: +33(0)4 37 91 54 65
Mail
Fax: +33(0)4 37 91 54 37
-
Résultat de la recherche
15 recherche sur le mot-clé 'Differential diagnosis'
Affiner la recherche Générer le flux rss de la recherche
Partager le résultat de cette recherche Faire une suggestion
Differential Diagnosis of Autism Spectrum Disorder and Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder by Means of Inhibitory Control and ‘Theory of Mind’ / Eva BUHLER in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 41-12 (December 2011)
[article]
Titre : Differential Diagnosis of Autism Spectrum Disorder and Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder by Means of Inhibitory Control and ‘Theory of Mind’ Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Eva BUHLER, Auteur ; Christian BACHMANN, Auteur ; Hannah GOYERT, Auteur ; Monika HEINZEL-GUTENBRUNNER, Auteur ; Inge KAMP-BECKER, Auteur Année de publication : 2011 Article en page(s) : p.1718-1726 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Differential diagnosis Autism spectrum disorders (ASD) Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) Inhibitory control Theory of mind Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Autism spectrum disorders (ASD) and attention deficit hyperactivity disorders (ADHD) are both associated with deficits in executive control and with problems in social contexts. This study analyses the variables inhibitory control and theory of mind (ToM), including a developmental aspect in the case of the latter, to differentiate between the disorders. Participants with an ASD ( N = 86), an ADHD ( N = 84) and with both disorders ( N = 52) in the age range of 5–22 years were compared. Results were differences in inhibitory control (ADHD < ASD) and in the ToM performance among younger (ASD < ADHD) but not among older children. We discuss whether common deficits in ToM differ in the developmental course. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10803-011-1205-1 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=148
in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders > 41-12 (December 2011) . - p.1718-1726[article] Differential Diagnosis of Autism Spectrum Disorder and Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder by Means of Inhibitory Control and ‘Theory of Mind’ [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Eva BUHLER, Auteur ; Christian BACHMANN, Auteur ; Hannah GOYERT, Auteur ; Monika HEINZEL-GUTENBRUNNER, Auteur ; Inge KAMP-BECKER, Auteur . - 2011 . - p.1718-1726.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders > 41-12 (December 2011) . - p.1718-1726
Mots-clés : Differential diagnosis Autism spectrum disorders (ASD) Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) Inhibitory control Theory of mind Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Autism spectrum disorders (ASD) and attention deficit hyperactivity disorders (ADHD) are both associated with deficits in executive control and with problems in social contexts. This study analyses the variables inhibitory control and theory of mind (ToM), including a developmental aspect in the case of the latter, to differentiate between the disorders. Participants with an ASD ( N = 86), an ADHD ( N = 84) and with both disorders ( N = 52) in the age range of 5–22 years were compared. Results were differences in inhibitory control (ADHD < ASD) and in the ToM performance among younger (ASD < ADHD) but not among older children. We discuss whether common deficits in ToM differ in the developmental course. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10803-011-1205-1 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=148 Qualitative Differences in Attribution of Mental States to Other People in Autism and Schizophrenia: What are the Tools for Differential Diagnosis? / M. MAZZA in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 52-3 (March 2022)
[article]
Titre : Qualitative Differences in Attribution of Mental States to Other People in Autism and Schizophrenia: What are the Tools for Differential Diagnosis? Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : M. MAZZA, Auteur ; M. C. PINO, Auteur ; R. KELLER, Auteur ; R. VAGNETTI, Auteur ; M. ATTANASIO, Auteur ; A. FILOCAMO, Auteur ; I. LE DONNE, Auteur ; F. MASEDU, Auteur ; M. VALENTI, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.1283-1298 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Autism Spectrum Disorder/diagnosis Autistic Disorder Diagnosis, Differential Humans Schizophrenia/diagnosis Theory of Mind Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) Differential diagnosis Schizophrenia spectrum disorders (SSD) Theory of Mind (ToM) Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : The differential diagnosis between schizophrenia spectrum disorders (SSD) and autism spectrum disorders (ASD) remains an important clinical question, because they have overlap in clinical diagnosis. This study explored the differences between ASD (n?=?44) and SSD patients (n?=?59), compared to typically developing peers (n?=?63), in completing an advanced Theory of Mind (ToM) task. The outcome found several differences between groups. The SSD patients showed greater difficulty in understanding social scenarios, while ASD individuals understood the stories, but did not correctly identify the protagonist's intention. The interesting aspect of the results is that some ToM stories are more informative about the mentalistic reasoning of the two clinical groups, namely, the stories that investigate pretend, persuasion, double bluff and ironic joke constructs. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10803-021-05035-3 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=455
in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders > 52-3 (March 2022) . - p.1283-1298[article] Qualitative Differences in Attribution of Mental States to Other People in Autism and Schizophrenia: What are the Tools for Differential Diagnosis? [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / M. MAZZA, Auteur ; M. C. PINO, Auteur ; R. KELLER, Auteur ; R. VAGNETTI, Auteur ; M. ATTANASIO, Auteur ; A. FILOCAMO, Auteur ; I. LE DONNE, Auteur ; F. MASEDU, Auteur ; M. VALENTI, Auteur . - p.1283-1298.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders > 52-3 (March 2022) . - p.1283-1298
Mots-clés : Autism Spectrum Disorder/diagnosis Autistic Disorder Diagnosis, Differential Humans Schizophrenia/diagnosis Theory of Mind Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) Differential diagnosis Schizophrenia spectrum disorders (SSD) Theory of Mind (ToM) Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : The differential diagnosis between schizophrenia spectrum disorders (SSD) and autism spectrum disorders (ASD) remains an important clinical question, because they have overlap in clinical diagnosis. This study explored the differences between ASD (n?=?44) and SSD patients (n?=?59), compared to typically developing peers (n?=?63), in completing an advanced Theory of Mind (ToM) task. The outcome found several differences between groups. The SSD patients showed greater difficulty in understanding social scenarios, while ASD individuals understood the stories, but did not correctly identify the protagonist's intention. The interesting aspect of the results is that some ToM stories are more informative about the mentalistic reasoning of the two clinical groups, namely, the stories that investigate pretend, persuasion, double bluff and ironic joke constructs. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10803-021-05035-3 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=455 When Are We Sure? Predictors of Clinician Certainty in the Diagnosis of Autism Spectrum Disorder / C. G. MCDONNELL in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 49-4 (April 2019)
[article]
Titre : When Are We Sure? Predictors of Clinician Certainty in the Diagnosis of Autism Spectrum Disorder Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : C. G. MCDONNELL, Auteur ; Catherine BRADLEY, Auteur ; Stephen M. KANNE, Auteur ; C. LAJONCHERE, Auteur ; Zachary WARREN, Auteur ; Laura A. CARPENTER, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.1391-1401 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Autism spectrum disorder Diagnostic certainty Differential diagnosis Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Differential diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is challenging, and uncertainty regarding a child's diagnosis may result in under-identification or prolonged diagnostic pathways. The current study examined diagnostic certainty, or how sure clinicians were that their diagnosis was accurate, among 478 toddler and preschool-aged children referred for possible ASD to academic medical specialty clinics. Overall, 60 percent of diagnoses were made with complete certainty. Clinicians were more certain when positively identifying ASD than ruling it out. Children presenting with a moderate (vs high or low) level of observable ASD symptoms were less likely to have a certain diagnosis. Further, clinicians rated less diagnostic certainty for older children, those with public insurance, and those with higher IQ and adaptive behavior abilities. En ligne : https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10803-018-3831-3 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=388
in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders > 49-4 (April 2019) . - p.1391-1401[article] When Are We Sure? Predictors of Clinician Certainty in the Diagnosis of Autism Spectrum Disorder [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / C. G. MCDONNELL, Auteur ; Catherine BRADLEY, Auteur ; Stephen M. KANNE, Auteur ; C. LAJONCHERE, Auteur ; Zachary WARREN, Auteur ; Laura A. CARPENTER, Auteur . - p.1391-1401.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders > 49-4 (April 2019) . - p.1391-1401
Mots-clés : Autism spectrum disorder Diagnostic certainty Differential diagnosis Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Differential diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is challenging, and uncertainty regarding a child's diagnosis may result in under-identification or prolonged diagnostic pathways. The current study examined diagnostic certainty, or how sure clinicians were that their diagnosis was accurate, among 478 toddler and preschool-aged children referred for possible ASD to academic medical specialty clinics. Overall, 60 percent of diagnoses were made with complete certainty. Clinicians were more certain when positively identifying ASD than ruling it out. Children presenting with a moderate (vs high or low) level of observable ASD symptoms were less likely to have a certain diagnosis. Further, clinicians rated less diagnostic certainty for older children, those with public insurance, and those with higher IQ and adaptive behavior abilities. En ligne : https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10803-018-3831-3 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=388 Practitioner Review: Diagnosing childhood resilience – a systemic approach to the diagnosis of adaptation in adverse social and physical ecologies / Michael UNGAR in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 56-1 (January 2015)
[article]
Titre : Practitioner Review: Diagnosing childhood resilience – a systemic approach to the diagnosis of adaptation in adverse social and physical ecologies Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Michael UNGAR, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.4-17 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Resilience vulnerable child populations diagnostic criteria adversity social ecologies social capital differential diagnosis differential impact Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Background With growing interest in resilience among mental health care providers globally, there is a need for a simple way to consider the complex interactions that predict adaptive coping when there is exposure to high levels of adversity such as family violence, mental illness of a child or caregiver, natural disasters, social marginalization, or political conflict. Methods This article presents diagnostic criteria for assessing childhood resilience in a way that is sensitive to the systemic factors that influence a child's wellbeing. The most important characteristics of children who cope well under adversity and avoid problems like depression, PTSD, and delinquency are highlighted. Results A multidimensional assessment of resilience is presented that examines, first, the severity, chronicity, ecological level, children's attributions of causality, and cultural and contextual relevance of experiences of adversity. Second, promotive and protective factors related to resilience are assessed with sensitivity to the differential impact these have on outcomes depending on a child's level of exposure to adversity. These factors include individual qualities like temperament, personality, and cognitions, as well as contextual dimensions of positive functioning related to the available and accessibility of resources, their strategic use, positive reinforcement by a child's significant others, and the adaptive capacity of the environment itself. Third, an assessment of resilience includes temporal and cultural factors that increase or decrease the influence of protective factors. A decision tree for the diagnosis of resilience is presented, followed by a case study and diagnosis of a 15-year-old boy who required treatment for a number of mental health challenges. Conclusions The diagnostic criteria for assessing resilience and its application to clinical practice demonstrate the potential usefulness of a systemic approach to understanding resilience among child populations. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12306 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=259
in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 56-1 (January 2015) . - p.4-17[article] Practitioner Review: Diagnosing childhood resilience – a systemic approach to the diagnosis of adaptation in adverse social and physical ecologies [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Michael UNGAR, Auteur . - p.4-17.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 56-1 (January 2015) . - p.4-17
Mots-clés : Resilience vulnerable child populations diagnostic criteria adversity social ecologies social capital differential diagnosis differential impact Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Background With growing interest in resilience among mental health care providers globally, there is a need for a simple way to consider the complex interactions that predict adaptive coping when there is exposure to high levels of adversity such as family violence, mental illness of a child or caregiver, natural disasters, social marginalization, or political conflict. Methods This article presents diagnostic criteria for assessing childhood resilience in a way that is sensitive to the systemic factors that influence a child's wellbeing. The most important characteristics of children who cope well under adversity and avoid problems like depression, PTSD, and delinquency are highlighted. Results A multidimensional assessment of resilience is presented that examines, first, the severity, chronicity, ecological level, children's attributions of causality, and cultural and contextual relevance of experiences of adversity. Second, promotive and protective factors related to resilience are assessed with sensitivity to the differential impact these have on outcomes depending on a child's level of exposure to adversity. These factors include individual qualities like temperament, personality, and cognitions, as well as contextual dimensions of positive functioning related to the available and accessibility of resources, their strategic use, positive reinforcement by a child's significant others, and the adaptive capacity of the environment itself. Third, an assessment of resilience includes temporal and cultural factors that increase or decrease the influence of protective factors. A decision tree for the diagnosis of resilience is presented, followed by a case study and diagnosis of a 15-year-old boy who required treatment for a number of mental health challenges. Conclusions The diagnostic criteria for assessing resilience and its application to clinical practice demonstrate the potential usefulness of a systemic approach to understanding resilience among child populations. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12306 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=259 Assessing Autism Spectrum Disorder in Intellectually Able Adults with the Personality Assessment Inventory: Normative Data and a Novel Supplemental Indicator / Kimberly B. HARRISON in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 50-11 (November 2020)
[article]
Titre : Assessing Autism Spectrum Disorder in Intellectually Able Adults with the Personality Assessment Inventory: Normative Data and a Novel Supplemental Indicator Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Kimberly B. HARRISON, Auteur ; Morgan N. MCCREDIE, Auteur ; Madhavi K. REDDY, Auteur ; Ankita KRISHNAN, Auteur ; Allison ENGSTROM, Auteur ; Yana S. POSEY, Auteur ; Leslie C. MOREY, Auteur ; Katherine A. LOVELAND, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.3935-3943 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) Differential diagnosis Discriminant function Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI) Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Differential diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) among intellectually-able adults often presents a clinical challenge, particularly when individuals present in crisis without diagnostic history. The Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI) is a multiscale personality and psychopathology instrument utilized across clinical settings, but to date there are no published normative data for use of the PAI with adults with ASD. This study provides normative PAI data for adults diagnosed with ASD, with effect size comparisons to the PAI clinical standardization sample and an inpatient sample. Additionally, a discriminant function was developed and cross-validated for identification of ASD-like symptomatology in a clinical population, which demonstrates promise as a screening tool to aid in the identification of individuals in need of specialized ASD assessment. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10803-020-04450-2 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=432
in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders > 50-11 (November 2020) . - p.3935-3943[article] Assessing Autism Spectrum Disorder in Intellectually Able Adults with the Personality Assessment Inventory: Normative Data and a Novel Supplemental Indicator [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Kimberly B. HARRISON, Auteur ; Morgan N. MCCREDIE, Auteur ; Madhavi K. REDDY, Auteur ; Ankita KRISHNAN, Auteur ; Allison ENGSTROM, Auteur ; Yana S. POSEY, Auteur ; Leslie C. MOREY, Auteur ; Katherine A. LOVELAND, Auteur . - p.3935-3943.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders > 50-11 (November 2020) . - p.3935-3943
Mots-clés : Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) Differential diagnosis Discriminant function Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI) Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Differential diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) among intellectually-able adults often presents a clinical challenge, particularly when individuals present in crisis without diagnostic history. The Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI) is a multiscale personality and psychopathology instrument utilized across clinical settings, but to date there are no published normative data for use of the PAI with adults with ASD. This study provides normative PAI data for adults diagnosed with ASD, with effect size comparisons to the PAI clinical standardization sample and an inpatient sample. Additionally, a discriminant function was developed and cross-validated for identification of ASD-like symptomatology in a clinical population, which demonstrates promise as a screening tool to aid in the identification of individuals in need of specialized ASD assessment. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10803-020-04450-2 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=432 Do communication and social interaction skills differ across youth diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, or dual diagnosis? / Brenda SALLEY in Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 20 (December 2015)
PermalinkImitation Assessment and Its Utility to the Diagnosis of Autism: Evidence from Consecutive Clinical Preschool Referrals for Suspected Autism / Marleen VANVUCHELEN in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 41-4 (April 2011)
PermalinkAutism and ADHD: Overlapping and discriminating symptoms / Susan DICKERSON MAYES in Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 6-1 (January-March 2012)
PermalinkCan Autism Spectrum Disorders and Social Anxiety Disorders be Differentiated by the Social Responsiveness Scale in Children and Adolescents? / Hannah CHOLEMKERY in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 44-5 (May 2014)
PermalinkPrevalence and correlates of autism in a state psychiatric hospital / David S. MANDELL in Autism, 16-6 (November 2012)
Permalink