- <Centre d'Information et de documentation du CRA Rhône-Alpes
- CRA
- Informations pratiques
-
Adresse
Centre d'information et de documentation
Horaires
du CRA Rhône-Alpes
Centre Hospitalier le Vinatier
bât 211
95, Bd Pinel
69678 Bron CedexLundi au Vendredi
Contact
9h00-12h00 13h30-16h00Tél: +33(0)4 37 91 54 65
Mail
Fax: +33(0)4 37 91 54 37
-
Adresse
Résultat de la recherche
10 recherche sur le mot-clé 'questionnaires'
Affiner la recherche Générer le flux rss de la recherche
Partager le résultat de cette recherche Faire une suggestion
Titre : Assessment of Anxiety in Youth With Autism Spectrum Disorder Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Lauren J. MOSKOWITZ, Auteur ; Tamara ROSEN, Auteur ; Matthew D. LERNER, Auteur ; Karen LEVINE, Auteur Année de publication : 2017 Importance : p.79-104 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Anxiety autism spectrum disorder assessment interviews questionnaires direct observation physiological multimethod Index. décimale : PAR-B PAR-B - Anxiété Résumé : Abstract Anxiety is one of the most common presenting problems for youth with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and causes greater impairment than the symptoms of ASD alone. Despite the increased risk for anxiety disorders in ASD, there is limited research on the assessment of anxiety in this population, relative to the large body of literature on anxiety in typically developing children. This may be due, in part, to the difficulty of assessing anxiety in ASD. Anxiety is a multifaceted construct involving behaviors, cognitions, affect, and physiological arousal. These multiple components of anxiety are ideally assessed using a multimethod approach, including questionnaires, interviews, direct behavioral observation, and occasionally physiological responses elicited by feared stimuli. This chapter will review the variety of methods that can be used to assess anxiety in youth with ASD, discussing the advantages and disadvantages of each method as well as the psychometric properties and uses of various assessment tools. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-805122-1.00005-3 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=300 Assessment of Anxiety in Youth With Autism Spectrum Disorder [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Lauren J. MOSKOWITZ, Auteur ; Tamara ROSEN, Auteur ; Matthew D. LERNER, Auteur ; Karen LEVINE, Auteur . - 2017 . - p.79-104.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
Mots-clés : Anxiety autism spectrum disorder assessment interviews questionnaires direct observation physiological multimethod Index. décimale : PAR-B PAR-B - Anxiété Résumé : Abstract Anxiety is one of the most common presenting problems for youth with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and causes greater impairment than the symptoms of ASD alone. Despite the increased risk for anxiety disorders in ASD, there is limited research on the assessment of anxiety in this population, relative to the large body of literature on anxiety in typically developing children. This may be due, in part, to the difficulty of assessing anxiety in ASD. Anxiety is a multifaceted construct involving behaviors, cognitions, affect, and physiological arousal. These multiple components of anxiety are ideally assessed using a multimethod approach, including questionnaires, interviews, direct behavioral observation, and occasionally physiological responses elicited by feared stimuli. This chapter will review the variety of methods that can be used to assess anxiety in youth with ASD, discussing the advantages and disadvantages of each method as well as the psychometric properties and uses of various assessment tools. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-805122-1.00005-3 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=300 Exemplaires
Code-barres Cote Support Localisation Section Disponibilité aucun exemplaire Criterion validity of the Autism Spectrum Rating Scales 2-5 parent report / Amy CAMODECA in Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 86 (August 2021)
[article]
Titre : Criterion validity of the Autism Spectrum Rating Scales 2-5 parent report Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Amy CAMODECA, Auteur ; Katy WALCOTT, Auteur Article en page(s) : 101820 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Autism Spectrum Disorder Parent report Questionnaires Criterion validity Diagnostic utility Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Background Questionnaires are frequently utilized in autism spectrum disorder (ASD) assessment and research, but there is limited evidence regarding their psychometric properties. Only two studies have investigated the diagnostic utility of the Autism Spectrum Rating Scale-2-5 parent report (ASRSp 2-5), and in both of these studies, the use of a gold-standard ASD measure in the diagnostic process is unclear. Method The current study investigated the criterion validity of the ASRSp-2-5 in a clinical sample of 238 children (X¯ age = 3.66; autism[AUT] n = 84; non-autism[NOT] n = 154). Children were diagnosed via a comprehensive assessment that included the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule-2. Results Analyses included t-tests/ANCOVAs, Logistic Regression (with and without covariates), and ROC analyses (with t-scores and predicted probabilities to account for covariates). The ASRSp 2-5 scores intended to be used for diagnosis (Total and DSM-5) were non-significant in all analyses. Higher scores in the NOT group were found for Unusual Behavior and Behavioral Rigidity. However, mean differences were non-significant with inclusion of control variables (IQ and age). Social, Peer Interaction, and Social-Emotional Reciprocity demonstrated the strongest findings. The ASD group had significantly higher scores on these scales, and findings held with covariates included (IQ for Social; age for Peer Interaction). However, odds ratios were small whether or not covariates were included, and AUCs were poor-fair (.69–.70). Sensitivity and specificity could not both be optimized at any cutpoint. Conclusions The findings were not as strong or as consistent as expected. Results suggest the ASRSp 2-5 is most useful in ruling out ASD in cases of low scores (<60). When the ASRSp 2-5 is utilized, behavioral, social, and emotional problems associated with other disorders must be considered in interpreting scores. Additional research on this measure is necessary. En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2021.101820 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=458
in Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders > 86 (August 2021) . - 101820[article] Criterion validity of the Autism Spectrum Rating Scales 2-5 parent report [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Amy CAMODECA, Auteur ; Katy WALCOTT, Auteur . - 101820.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders > 86 (August 2021) . - 101820
Mots-clés : Autism Spectrum Disorder Parent report Questionnaires Criterion validity Diagnostic utility Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Background Questionnaires are frequently utilized in autism spectrum disorder (ASD) assessment and research, but there is limited evidence regarding their psychometric properties. Only two studies have investigated the diagnostic utility of the Autism Spectrum Rating Scale-2-5 parent report (ASRSp 2-5), and in both of these studies, the use of a gold-standard ASD measure in the diagnostic process is unclear. Method The current study investigated the criterion validity of the ASRSp-2-5 in a clinical sample of 238 children (X¯ age = 3.66; autism[AUT] n = 84; non-autism[NOT] n = 154). Children were diagnosed via a comprehensive assessment that included the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule-2. Results Analyses included t-tests/ANCOVAs, Logistic Regression (with and without covariates), and ROC analyses (with t-scores and predicted probabilities to account for covariates). The ASRSp 2-5 scores intended to be used for diagnosis (Total and DSM-5) were non-significant in all analyses. Higher scores in the NOT group were found for Unusual Behavior and Behavioral Rigidity. However, mean differences were non-significant with inclusion of control variables (IQ and age). Social, Peer Interaction, and Social-Emotional Reciprocity demonstrated the strongest findings. The ASD group had significantly higher scores on these scales, and findings held with covariates included (IQ for Social; age for Peer Interaction). However, odds ratios were small whether or not covariates were included, and AUCs were poor-fair (.69–.70). Sensitivity and specificity could not both be optimized at any cutpoint. Conclusions The findings were not as strong or as consistent as expected. Results suggest the ASRSp 2-5 is most useful in ruling out ASD in cases of low scores (<60). When the ASRSp 2-5 is utilized, behavioral, social, and emotional problems associated with other disorders must be considered in interpreting scores. Additional research on this measure is necessary. En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2021.101820 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=458 A mixed methods evaluation of the acceptability of therapy using LEGO® bricks (LEGO® based therapy) in mainstream primary and secondary education / Amy BARR in Autism Research, 15-7 (July 2022)
[article]
Titre : A mixed methods evaluation of the acceptability of therapy using LEGO® bricks (LEGO® based therapy) in mainstream primary and secondary education Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Amy BARR, Auteur ; Elizabeth COATES, Auteur ; Ellen KINGSLEY, Auteur ; Gina GOMEZ DE LA CUESTA, Auteur ; Katie BIGGS, Auteur ; Ann LE COUTEUR, Auteur ; Barry WRIGHT, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.1237-1248 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Lego® autism play brick therapy qualitative research questionnaires social communication Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Many autistic children and young people need extra support with social skills. Social skills programmes, such as LEGO® based therapy (LBT), are commonly used to help with these difficulties. The aim of this study was to examine the acceptability of LBT using qualitative interviews and questionnaires with facilitators and parents/guardians on behalf of autistic children and young people. Acceptability was measured in line with constructs of the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability. Questionnaires were analyzed descriptively and between group comparisons were undertaken using the Mann-Whitney U Test. Telephone interviews were undertaken with a sub-sample of facilitators. All interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim, and framework analysis was performed by two researchers supported by NVivo. The questionnaire response rate was 80% for facilitators and 77% for parents/guardians. Overall acceptability, measured on a 1-5 (minimum-maximum) scale, was high for both facilitators and parents/guardians with a median (range) of 5 (4-5) and 4 (3-5), respectively. Facilitators rated the acceptability of the programme significantly higher overall than parents (p 0.001). Facilitators reported that participants and wider school staff viewed the programme positively. They observed improvements in communication and social skills during the sessions. Potential barriers to programme delivery, such as resources and staff schedules, were identified but facilitators reported that these challenges did not outweigh the benefits. There is increasing emphasis on the role of schools in seeking to improve social outcomes for autistic children therefore this high degree of acceptability makes this an attractive school-based programme for schools, autistic children and their families. LAY SUMMARY: Social skills programmes, such as LEGO® based therapy (LBT), are often used to help autistic children and young people with their social skills. The acceptability of LBT with school staff and parents/guardians on behalf of children and young people was explored using interviews and questionnaires. Our results show that LBT is viewed as a highly acceptable programme that can help autistic children and young people improve their communication and social skills. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/aur.2725 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=476
in Autism Research > 15-7 (July 2022) . - p.1237-1248[article] A mixed methods evaluation of the acceptability of therapy using LEGO® bricks (LEGO® based therapy) in mainstream primary and secondary education [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Amy BARR, Auteur ; Elizabeth COATES, Auteur ; Ellen KINGSLEY, Auteur ; Gina GOMEZ DE LA CUESTA, Auteur ; Katie BIGGS, Auteur ; Ann LE COUTEUR, Auteur ; Barry WRIGHT, Auteur . - p.1237-1248.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Autism Research > 15-7 (July 2022) . - p.1237-1248
Mots-clés : Lego® autism play brick therapy qualitative research questionnaires social communication Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Many autistic children and young people need extra support with social skills. Social skills programmes, such as LEGO® based therapy (LBT), are commonly used to help with these difficulties. The aim of this study was to examine the acceptability of LBT using qualitative interviews and questionnaires with facilitators and parents/guardians on behalf of autistic children and young people. Acceptability was measured in line with constructs of the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability. Questionnaires were analyzed descriptively and between group comparisons were undertaken using the Mann-Whitney U Test. Telephone interviews were undertaken with a sub-sample of facilitators. All interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim, and framework analysis was performed by two researchers supported by NVivo. The questionnaire response rate was 80% for facilitators and 77% for parents/guardians. Overall acceptability, measured on a 1-5 (minimum-maximum) scale, was high for both facilitators and parents/guardians with a median (range) of 5 (4-5) and 4 (3-5), respectively. Facilitators rated the acceptability of the programme significantly higher overall than parents (p 0.001). Facilitators reported that participants and wider school staff viewed the programme positively. They observed improvements in communication and social skills during the sessions. Potential barriers to programme delivery, such as resources and staff schedules, were identified but facilitators reported that these challenges did not outweigh the benefits. There is increasing emphasis on the role of schools in seeking to improve social outcomes for autistic children therefore this high degree of acceptability makes this an attractive school-based programme for schools, autistic children and their families. LAY SUMMARY: Social skills programmes, such as LEGO® based therapy (LBT), are often used to help autistic children and young people with their social skills. The acceptability of LBT with school staff and parents/guardians on behalf of children and young people was explored using interviews and questionnaires. Our results show that LBT is viewed as a highly acceptable programme that can help autistic children and young people improve their communication and social skills. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/aur.2725 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=476 Brief Report: An Evaluation of the Social Communication Questionnaire as a Screening Tool for Autism Spectrum Disorder in Young People Referred to Child & Adolescent Mental Health Services / M. J. HOLLOCKS in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 49-6 (June 2019)
[article]
Titre : Brief Report: An Evaluation of the Social Communication Questionnaire as a Screening Tool for Autism Spectrum Disorder in Young People Referred to Child & Adolescent Mental Health Services Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : M. J. HOLLOCKS, Auteur ; R. CASSON, Auteur ; C. WHITE, Auteur ; J. DOBSON, Auteur ; P. BEAZLEY, Auteur ; A. HUMPHREY, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.2618-2623 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Adolescent Assessment Autism spectrum disorder Mental health services Questionnaires Sensitivity Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : The SCQ is a widely used screening measure for the assessment of autism spectrum disorder (ASD). However, its sensitivity and specificity when used with older children in the context of community Child & Adolescent Mental Health services is unclear. Seventy-seven (Mean age = 12.8 years) young people with suspected ASD were screened using parent- and teacher-reported SCQ's before completing a comprehensive diagnostic assessment. Of the 77 young people included, 44 (57%) met criteria for an ASD diagnosis. Our results indicated that regardless of informant, SCQ scores did not significantly predict the outcome of the diagnostic assessment. Based on the published cut-off score for the SCQ, Receiver Operating Characteristic curve analyses revealed a lower than expected sensitivity and specificity. This suggests that the SCQ is not an effective screening tool when used in the context of community Child & Adolescent Mental Health services. En ligne : https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10803-019-03982-6 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=400
in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders > 49-6 (June 2019) . - p.2618-2623[article] Brief Report: An Evaluation of the Social Communication Questionnaire as a Screening Tool for Autism Spectrum Disorder in Young People Referred to Child & Adolescent Mental Health Services [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / M. J. HOLLOCKS, Auteur ; R. CASSON, Auteur ; C. WHITE, Auteur ; J. DOBSON, Auteur ; P. BEAZLEY, Auteur ; A. HUMPHREY, Auteur . - p.2618-2623.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders > 49-6 (June 2019) . - p.2618-2623
Mots-clés : Adolescent Assessment Autism spectrum disorder Mental health services Questionnaires Sensitivity Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : The SCQ is a widely used screening measure for the assessment of autism spectrum disorder (ASD). However, its sensitivity and specificity when used with older children in the context of community Child & Adolescent Mental Health services is unclear. Seventy-seven (Mean age = 12.8 years) young people with suspected ASD were screened using parent- and teacher-reported SCQ's before completing a comprehensive diagnostic assessment. Of the 77 young people included, 44 (57%) met criteria for an ASD diagnosis. Our results indicated that regardless of informant, SCQ scores did not significantly predict the outcome of the diagnostic assessment. Based on the published cut-off score for the SCQ, Receiver Operating Characteristic curve analyses revealed a lower than expected sensitivity and specificity. This suggests that the SCQ is not an effective screening tool when used in the context of community Child & Adolescent Mental Health services. En ligne : https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10803-019-03982-6 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=400 Informant discrepancy defines discrete, clinically useful autism spectrum disorder subgroups / Matthew D. LERNER in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 58-7 (July 2017)
[article]
Titre : Informant discrepancy defines discrete, clinically useful autism spectrum disorder subgroups Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Matthew D. LERNER, Auteur ; Andres DE LOS REYES, Auteur ; Deborah A.G. DRABICK, Auteur ; Alan H. GERBER, Auteur ; Kenneth D. GADOW, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.829-839 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Autism spectrum disorders phenotype nosology assessment questionnaires Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Background Discrepancy between informants (parents and teachers) in severity ratings of core symptoms commonly arise when assessing autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Whether such discrepancy yields unique information about the ASD phenotype and its clinical correlates has not been examined. We examined whether degree of discrepancy between parent and teacher ASD symptom ratings defines discrete, clinically meaningful subgroups of youth with ASD using an efficient, cost-effective procedure. Methods Children with ASD (N = 283; 82% boys; Mage = 10.5 years) were drawn from a specialty ASD clinic. Parents and teachers provided ratings of the three core DSM-IV-TR domains of ASD symptoms (communication, social, and perseverative behavior) with the Child and Adolescent Symptom Inventory-4R (CASI-4R). External validators included child psychotropic medication status, frequency of ASD-relevant school-based services, and the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule (ADOS-2). Results Four distinct subgroups emerged that ranged from large between-informant discrepancy (informant-specific) to relative lack of discrepancy (i.e. informant agreement; cross-situational): Moderate Parent/Low Teacher or Low Parent/Moderate Teacher Severity (Discrepancy), and Moderate or High Symptom Severity (Agreement). Subgroups were highly distinct (mean probability of group assignment = 94%). Relative to Discrepancy subgroups, Agreement subgroups were more likely to receive psychotropic medication, school-based special education services, and an ADOS-2 diagnosis. These differential associations would not have been identified based solely on CASI-4R scores from one informant. Conclusions The degree of parent–teacher discrepancy about ASD symptom severity appears to provide more clinically useful information than reliance on a specific symptom domain or informant, and thus yields an innovative, cost-effective approach to assessing functional impairment. This conclusion stands in contrast to existing symptom clustering approaches in ASD, which treat within-informant patterns of symptom severity as generalizable across settings. Within-child variability in symptom expression across settings may yield uniquely useful information for characterizing the ASD phenotype. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12730 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=316
in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 58-7 (July 2017) . - p.829-839[article] Informant discrepancy defines discrete, clinically useful autism spectrum disorder subgroups [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Matthew D. LERNER, Auteur ; Andres DE LOS REYES, Auteur ; Deborah A.G. DRABICK, Auteur ; Alan H. GERBER, Auteur ; Kenneth D. GADOW, Auteur . - p.829-839.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 58-7 (July 2017) . - p.829-839
Mots-clés : Autism spectrum disorders phenotype nosology assessment questionnaires Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Background Discrepancy between informants (parents and teachers) in severity ratings of core symptoms commonly arise when assessing autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Whether such discrepancy yields unique information about the ASD phenotype and its clinical correlates has not been examined. We examined whether degree of discrepancy between parent and teacher ASD symptom ratings defines discrete, clinically meaningful subgroups of youth with ASD using an efficient, cost-effective procedure. Methods Children with ASD (N = 283; 82% boys; Mage = 10.5 years) were drawn from a specialty ASD clinic. Parents and teachers provided ratings of the three core DSM-IV-TR domains of ASD symptoms (communication, social, and perseverative behavior) with the Child and Adolescent Symptom Inventory-4R (CASI-4R). External validators included child psychotropic medication status, frequency of ASD-relevant school-based services, and the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule (ADOS-2). Results Four distinct subgroups emerged that ranged from large between-informant discrepancy (informant-specific) to relative lack of discrepancy (i.e. informant agreement; cross-situational): Moderate Parent/Low Teacher or Low Parent/Moderate Teacher Severity (Discrepancy), and Moderate or High Symptom Severity (Agreement). Subgroups were highly distinct (mean probability of group assignment = 94%). Relative to Discrepancy subgroups, Agreement subgroups were more likely to receive psychotropic medication, school-based special education services, and an ADOS-2 diagnosis. These differential associations would not have been identified based solely on CASI-4R scores from one informant. Conclusions The degree of parent–teacher discrepancy about ASD symptom severity appears to provide more clinically useful information than reliance on a specific symptom domain or informant, and thus yields an innovative, cost-effective approach to assessing functional impairment. This conclusion stands in contrast to existing symptom clustering approaches in ASD, which treat within-informant patterns of symptom severity as generalizable across settings. Within-child variability in symptom expression across settings may yield uniquely useful information for characterizing the ASD phenotype. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12730 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=316 Measuring strengths and weaknesses in dimensional psychiatry / L. M. ALEXANDER in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 61-1 (January 2020)
PermalinkReliability Generalization for Childhood Autism Rating Scale / Jonathan BREIDBORD in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 43-12 (December 2013)
PermalinkThe Extended Version of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire as a Guide to Child Psychiatric Caseness and Consequent Burden / Robert GOODMAN in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 40-5 (July 1999)
PermalinkToddler autism screening questionnaire: Development and potential clinical validity / Wen-Che TSAI in Autism, 16-4 (July 2012)
PermalinkUtility of the Asperger Syndrome Diagnostic Scale in the Assessment of Autism Spectrum Disorders / Amy CAMODECA in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 50-2 (February 2020)
Permalink