
- <Centre d'Information et de documentation du CRA Rhône-Alpes
- CRA
- Informations pratiques
-
Adresse
Centre d'information et de documentation
Horaires
du CRA Rhône-Alpes
Centre Hospitalier le Vinatier
bât 211
95, Bd Pinel
69678 Bron CedexLundi au Vendredi
Contact
9h00-12h00 13h30-16h00Tél: +33(0)4 37 91 54 65
Mail
Fax: +33(0)4 37 91 54 37
-
Adresse
Auteur Y. OKAMOTO
|
|
Documents disponibles écrits par cet auteur (2)
Faire une suggestion Affiner la rechercheA cross-cultural examination of bi-directional mentalising in autistic and non-autistic adults / Bianca A. SCHUSTER in Molecular Autism, 16 (2025)
![]()
[article]
Titre : A cross-cultural examination of bi-directional mentalising in autistic and non-autistic adults Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Bianca A. SCHUSTER, Auteur ; Y. OKAMOTO, Auteur ; T. TAKAHASHI, Auteur ; Y. KURIHARA, Auteur ; C. T. KEATING, Auteur ; J. L. COOK, Auteur ; H. KOSAKA, Auteur ; M. IDE, Auteur ; H. NARUSE, Auteur ; C. KRAAIJKAMP, Auteur ; R. OSU, Auteur ; Bianca A. SCHUSTER, Auteur ; Y. OKAMOTO, Auteur ; T. TAKAHASHI, Auteur ; Y. KURIHARA, Auteur ; C. T. KEATING, Auteur ; J. L. COOK, Auteur ; H. KOSAKA, Auteur ; M. IDE, Auteur ; H. NARUSE, Auteur ; C. KRAAIJKAMP, Auteur ; R. OSU, Auteur Article en page(s) : 29 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Humans Male Female Adult Cross-Cultural Comparison Autistic Disorder/psychology Young Adult Theory of Mind Mentalization United Kingdom Japan Middle Aged Adolescent Autism Collectivist Cross-cultural Cross-neurotype Double empathy Individualist Mentalising Movement differences Theory of mind Uk Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : BACKGROUND: So-called 'mismatch accounts' propose that, rather than arising from a socio-cognitive deficit present in autistic people, mentalising difficulties are the product of a mismatch in neurotype between interaction partners. Although this idea has grown in popularity over recent years, there is currently only limited empirical evidence to support mismatch theories. Moreover, the social model of disability such theories are grounded in demands a culturally situated view of social interaction, yet research on mentalising and/or autism is largely biased towards Western countries, with little knowledge on how successful mentalising is defined differently, and how tools to assess socio-cognitive ability compare, across cultures. METHODS: Using a widely employed mentalising task-the animations task-, the current study investigated and compared the bi-directional mentalising performance of British and Japanese autistic and non-autistic adults and assessed observer-agent kinematic similarity as a potential dimension along which mismatches may occur between neurotypes. Participants were asked to depict various mental state- and action-based interactions by moving two triangles across a touch-screen device before viewing and interpreting stimuli generated by other participants. RESULTS: In the UK sample, our results replicate a seminal prior study in showing poorer mentalising abilities in non-autistic adults for animations generated by the autistic group. Crucially, the same pattern did not emerge in the Japanese sample, where there were no mentalising differences between the two groups. LIMITATIONS: Limitations of the current study include that efforts to match all samples within and across cultures in terms of IQ, gender, and age were not successful in all comparisons, but control analyses suggest this did not affect our results. Furthermore, any performance differences were found for both the mental state- and action-based conditions, mirroring prior work and raising questions about the domain-specificity of the employed task. CONCLUSIONS: Our results add support for a paradigm shift in the autism literature, moving beyond deficit-based models and towards acknowledging the inherently relational nature of social interaction. We further discuss how our findings suggest limited cultural transferability of common socio-cognitive measures rather than superior mentalising abilities in Japanese autistic adults, underscoring the need for more cross-cultural research and the development of culturally sensitive scientific and diagnostic tools. En ligne : https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13229-025-00659-z Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=569
in Molecular Autism > 16 (2025) . - 29[article] A cross-cultural examination of bi-directional mentalising in autistic and non-autistic adults [texte imprimé] / Bianca A. SCHUSTER, Auteur ; Y. OKAMOTO, Auteur ; T. TAKAHASHI, Auteur ; Y. KURIHARA, Auteur ; C. T. KEATING, Auteur ; J. L. COOK, Auteur ; H. KOSAKA, Auteur ; M. IDE, Auteur ; H. NARUSE, Auteur ; C. KRAAIJKAMP, Auteur ; R. OSU, Auteur ; Bianca A. SCHUSTER, Auteur ; Y. OKAMOTO, Auteur ; T. TAKAHASHI, Auteur ; Y. KURIHARA, Auteur ; C. T. KEATING, Auteur ; J. L. COOK, Auteur ; H. KOSAKA, Auteur ; M. IDE, Auteur ; H. NARUSE, Auteur ; C. KRAAIJKAMP, Auteur ; R. OSU, Auteur . - 29.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Molecular Autism > 16 (2025) . - 29
Mots-clés : Humans Male Female Adult Cross-Cultural Comparison Autistic Disorder/psychology Young Adult Theory of Mind Mentalization United Kingdom Japan Middle Aged Adolescent Autism Collectivist Cross-cultural Cross-neurotype Double empathy Individualist Mentalising Movement differences Theory of mind Uk Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : BACKGROUND: So-called 'mismatch accounts' propose that, rather than arising from a socio-cognitive deficit present in autistic people, mentalising difficulties are the product of a mismatch in neurotype between interaction partners. Although this idea has grown in popularity over recent years, there is currently only limited empirical evidence to support mismatch theories. Moreover, the social model of disability such theories are grounded in demands a culturally situated view of social interaction, yet research on mentalising and/or autism is largely biased towards Western countries, with little knowledge on how successful mentalising is defined differently, and how tools to assess socio-cognitive ability compare, across cultures. METHODS: Using a widely employed mentalising task-the animations task-, the current study investigated and compared the bi-directional mentalising performance of British and Japanese autistic and non-autistic adults and assessed observer-agent kinematic similarity as a potential dimension along which mismatches may occur between neurotypes. Participants were asked to depict various mental state- and action-based interactions by moving two triangles across a touch-screen device before viewing and interpreting stimuli generated by other participants. RESULTS: In the UK sample, our results replicate a seminal prior study in showing poorer mentalising abilities in non-autistic adults for animations generated by the autistic group. Crucially, the same pattern did not emerge in the Japanese sample, where there were no mentalising differences between the two groups. LIMITATIONS: Limitations of the current study include that efforts to match all samples within and across cultures in terms of IQ, gender, and age were not successful in all comparisons, but control analyses suggest this did not affect our results. Furthermore, any performance differences were found for both the mental state- and action-based conditions, mirroring prior work and raising questions about the domain-specificity of the employed task. CONCLUSIONS: Our results add support for a paradigm shift in the autism literature, moving beyond deficit-based models and towards acknowledging the inherently relational nature of social interaction. We further discuss how our findings suggest limited cultural transferability of common socio-cognitive measures rather than superior mentalising abilities in Japanese autistic adults, underscoring the need for more cross-cultural research and the development of culturally sensitive scientific and diagnostic tools. En ligne : https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13229-025-00659-z Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=569 Gazefinder as a clinical supplementary tool for discriminating between autism spectrum disorder and typical development in male adolescents and adults / T. FUJIOKA in Molecular Autism, 7 (2016)
![]()
[article]
Titre : Gazefinder as a clinical supplementary tool for discriminating between autism spectrum disorder and typical development in male adolescents and adults Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : T. FUJIOKA, Auteur ; K. INOHARA, Auteur ; Y. OKAMOTO, Auteur ; Y. MASUYA, Auteur ; M. ISHITOBI, Auteur ; Daisuke N. SAITO, Auteur ; M. JUNG, Auteur ; Sumiyoshi ARAI, Auteur ; Y. MATSUMURA, Auteur ; T. X. FUJISAWA, Auteur ; K. NARITA, Auteur ; K. SUZUKI, Auteur ; K. J. TSUCHIYA, Auteur ; N. MORI, Auteur ; T. KATAYAMA, Auteur ; M. SATO, Auteur ; T. MUNESUE, Auteur ; H. OKAZAWA, Auteur ; A. TOMODA, Auteur ; Y. WADA, Auteur ; H. KOSAKA, Auteur Article en page(s) : 19p. Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Adolescent Adult Area Under Curve Autism Spectrum Disorder/diagnosis/physiopathology Case-Control Studies Discriminant Analysis Fixation, Ocular/physiology Humans Male Ocular Physiological Phenomena Photic Stimulation Psychometrics ROC Curve Social Behavior Time Factors Autism spectrum disorder Biological motion Eye-tracking Face Fixation Gaze abnormality Geometry Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : BACKGROUND: Gaze abnormality is a diagnostic criterion for autism spectrum disorder (ASD). However, few easy-to-use clinical tools exist to evaluate the unique eye-gaze patterns of ASD. Recently, we developed Gazefinder, an all-in-one eye-tracking system for early detection of ASD in toddlers. Because abnormal gaze patterns have been documented in various ASD age groups, we predicted that Gazefinder might also detect gaze abnormality in adolescents and adults. In this study, we tested whether Gazefinder could identify unique gaze patterns in adolescents and adults with ASD. METHODS: We measured the percentage of eye fixation time allocated to particular objects depicted in movies (i.e., eyes and mouth in human face movies, upright and inverted biological motion in movies that presented these stimuli simultaneously, and people and geometry in movies that presented these stimuli simultaneously) by male adolescents and adults with ASD (N = 26) and age-matched males with typical development (TD; N = 35). We compared these percentages between the two groups (ASD and TD) and with scores on the social responsiveness scale (SRS). Further, we conducted discriminant analyses to determine if fixation times allocated to particular objects could be used to discriminate between individuals with and without ASD. RESULTS: Compared with the TD group, the ASD group showed significantly less fixation time at locations of salient social information (i.e., eyes in the movie of human faces without lip movement and people in the movie of people and geometry), while there were no significant groupwise differences in the responses to movies of human faces with lip movement or biological motion. In a within-group correlation analysis, a few of the fixation-time items correlated with SRS, although most of them did not. No items significantly correlated with SRS in both ASD and TD groups. The percentage fixation times to eyes and people, which exhibited large effect sizes for the group difference, could differentiate ASD and TD with a sensitivity of 81.0% and a specificity of 80.0%. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that Gazefinder is potentially a valuable and easy-to-use tool for objectively measuring unique gaze patterns and discriminating between ASD and TD in male adolescents and adults. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13229-016-0083-y Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=328
in Molecular Autism > 7 (2016) . - 19p.[article] Gazefinder as a clinical supplementary tool for discriminating between autism spectrum disorder and typical development in male adolescents and adults [texte imprimé] / T. FUJIOKA, Auteur ; K. INOHARA, Auteur ; Y. OKAMOTO, Auteur ; Y. MASUYA, Auteur ; M. ISHITOBI, Auteur ; Daisuke N. SAITO, Auteur ; M. JUNG, Auteur ; Sumiyoshi ARAI, Auteur ; Y. MATSUMURA, Auteur ; T. X. FUJISAWA, Auteur ; K. NARITA, Auteur ; K. SUZUKI, Auteur ; K. J. TSUCHIYA, Auteur ; N. MORI, Auteur ; T. KATAYAMA, Auteur ; M. SATO, Auteur ; T. MUNESUE, Auteur ; H. OKAZAWA, Auteur ; A. TOMODA, Auteur ; Y. WADA, Auteur ; H. KOSAKA, Auteur . - 19p.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Molecular Autism > 7 (2016) . - 19p.
Mots-clés : Adolescent Adult Area Under Curve Autism Spectrum Disorder/diagnosis/physiopathology Case-Control Studies Discriminant Analysis Fixation, Ocular/physiology Humans Male Ocular Physiological Phenomena Photic Stimulation Psychometrics ROC Curve Social Behavior Time Factors Autism spectrum disorder Biological motion Eye-tracking Face Fixation Gaze abnormality Geometry Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : BACKGROUND: Gaze abnormality is a diagnostic criterion for autism spectrum disorder (ASD). However, few easy-to-use clinical tools exist to evaluate the unique eye-gaze patterns of ASD. Recently, we developed Gazefinder, an all-in-one eye-tracking system for early detection of ASD in toddlers. Because abnormal gaze patterns have been documented in various ASD age groups, we predicted that Gazefinder might also detect gaze abnormality in adolescents and adults. In this study, we tested whether Gazefinder could identify unique gaze patterns in adolescents and adults with ASD. METHODS: We measured the percentage of eye fixation time allocated to particular objects depicted in movies (i.e., eyes and mouth in human face movies, upright and inverted biological motion in movies that presented these stimuli simultaneously, and people and geometry in movies that presented these stimuli simultaneously) by male adolescents and adults with ASD (N = 26) and age-matched males with typical development (TD; N = 35). We compared these percentages between the two groups (ASD and TD) and with scores on the social responsiveness scale (SRS). Further, we conducted discriminant analyses to determine if fixation times allocated to particular objects could be used to discriminate between individuals with and without ASD. RESULTS: Compared with the TD group, the ASD group showed significantly less fixation time at locations of salient social information (i.e., eyes in the movie of human faces without lip movement and people in the movie of people and geometry), while there were no significant groupwise differences in the responses to movies of human faces with lip movement or biological motion. In a within-group correlation analysis, a few of the fixation-time items correlated with SRS, although most of them did not. No items significantly correlated with SRS in both ASD and TD groups. The percentage fixation times to eyes and people, which exhibited large effect sizes for the group difference, could differentiate ASD and TD with a sensitivity of 81.0% and a specificity of 80.0%. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that Gazefinder is potentially a valuable and easy-to-use tool for objectively measuring unique gaze patterns and discriminating between ASD and TD in male adolescents and adults. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13229-016-0083-y Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=328

