Centre d'Information et de documentation du CRA Rhône-Alpes
CRA
Informations pratiques
-
Adresse
Centre d'information et de documentation
du CRA Rhône-Alpes
Centre Hospitalier le Vinatier
bât 211
95, Bd Pinel
69678 Bron CedexHoraires
Lundi au Vendredi
9h00-12h00 13h30-16h00Contact
Tél: +33(0)4 37 91 54 65
Mail
Fax: +33(0)4 37 91 54 37
-
Résultat de la recherche
3 recherche sur le mot-clé 'diathesis stress'
Affiner la recherche Générer le flux rss de la recherche
Partager le résultat de cette recherche Faire une suggestion
Effects of maternal sensitivity on low birth weight children's academic achievement: a test of differential susceptibility versus diathesis stress / Julia JAEKEL in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 56-6 (June 2015)
[article]
Titre : Effects of maternal sensitivity on low birth weight children's academic achievement: a test of differential susceptibility versus diathesis stress Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Julia JAEKEL, Auteur ; Michael PLUESS, Auteur ; Jay BELSKY, Auteur ; Dieter WOLKE, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.693-701 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Differential susceptibility diathesis stress low birth weight academic achievement maternal sensitivity Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Background Differential Susceptibility Theory (DST) postulates that some children are more affected – for better and for worse – by developmental experiences, including parenting, than others. Low birth weight (LBW, 1,500–2,499 g) may not only be a predictor for neurodevelopmental impairment but also a marker for prenatally programmed susceptibility. The aim was to test if effects of sensitive parenting on LBW and very LBW (VLBW, <1,500 g) versus normal birth weight (NBW, ?2,500 g) children's academic achievement are best explained by a differential susceptibility versus diathesis-stress model of person-X-environment interaction. Methods Nine hundred and twenty-two children ranging from 600 g to 5,140 g birth weight were studied as part of a prospective, geographically defined, longitudinal investigation of neonatal at-risk children in South Germany (Bavarian Longitudinal Study). Sensitive parenting during a structured mother–child interaction task was observed and rated at age 6 years. Academic achievement was assessed with standardized mathematic, reading, and spelling/writing tests at age 8 years. Results Maternal sensitivity positively predicted the academic achievement of both LBW (n = 283) and VLBW (n = 202) children. Confirmatory-comparative and model-fitting analysis (testing LBW vs. NBW and VLBW vs. NBW) indicated that LBW and VLBW children were more susceptible than NBW to the adverse effects of low-sensitive, but not beneficial effects of high-sensitive parenting. Conclusions Findings proved more consistent with the diathesis stress than differential-susceptibility model of person-X-environment interaction: LBW and VLBW children's exposure to positive parenting predicted catch-up to their NBW peers, whereas exposure to negative parenting predicted much poorer functioning. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12331 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=260
in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 56-6 (June 2015) . - p.693-701[article] Effects of maternal sensitivity on low birth weight children's academic achievement: a test of differential susceptibility versus diathesis stress [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Julia JAEKEL, Auteur ; Michael PLUESS, Auteur ; Jay BELSKY, Auteur ; Dieter WOLKE, Auteur . - p.693-701.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 56-6 (June 2015) . - p.693-701
Mots-clés : Differential susceptibility diathesis stress low birth weight academic achievement maternal sensitivity Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Background Differential Susceptibility Theory (DST) postulates that some children are more affected – for better and for worse – by developmental experiences, including parenting, than others. Low birth weight (LBW, 1,500–2,499 g) may not only be a predictor for neurodevelopmental impairment but also a marker for prenatally programmed susceptibility. The aim was to test if effects of sensitive parenting on LBW and very LBW (VLBW, <1,500 g) versus normal birth weight (NBW, ?2,500 g) children's academic achievement are best explained by a differential susceptibility versus diathesis-stress model of person-X-environment interaction. Methods Nine hundred and twenty-two children ranging from 600 g to 5,140 g birth weight were studied as part of a prospective, geographically defined, longitudinal investigation of neonatal at-risk children in South Germany (Bavarian Longitudinal Study). Sensitive parenting during a structured mother–child interaction task was observed and rated at age 6 years. Academic achievement was assessed with standardized mathematic, reading, and spelling/writing tests at age 8 years. Results Maternal sensitivity positively predicted the academic achievement of both LBW (n = 283) and VLBW (n = 202) children. Confirmatory-comparative and model-fitting analysis (testing LBW vs. NBW and VLBW vs. NBW) indicated that LBW and VLBW children were more susceptible than NBW to the adverse effects of low-sensitive, but not beneficial effects of high-sensitive parenting. Conclusions Findings proved more consistent with the diathesis stress than differential-susceptibility model of person-X-environment interaction: LBW and VLBW children's exposure to positive parenting predicted catch-up to their NBW peers, whereas exposure to negative parenting predicted much poorer functioning. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12331 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=260 Heart rate variability moderates the effects of COVID-19-related stress and family adversity on emotional problems in adolescents: Testing models of differential susceptibility and diathesis stress / Jonas G. MILLER in Development and Psychopathology, 34-5 (December 2022)
[article]
Titre : Heart rate variability moderates the effects of COVID-19-related stress and family adversity on emotional problems in adolescents: Testing models of differential susceptibility and diathesis stress Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Jonas G. MILLER, Auteur ; Rajpreet CHAHAL, Auteur ; Jaclyn S. KIRSHENBAUM, Auteur ; Tiffany C. HO, Auteur ; Anthony J. GIFUNI, Auteur ; Ian H. GOTLIB, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.1974-1985 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : adolescence biological sensitivity to context COVID-19 diathesis stress differential susceptibility heart rate variability Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : The COVID-19 pandemic is a unique period of stress, uncertainty, and adversity that will have significant implications for adolescent mental health. Nevertheless, stress and adversity related to COVID-19 may be more consequential for some adolescents’ mental health than for others. We examined whether heart rate variability (HRV) indicated differential susceptibility to mental health difficulties associated with COVID-19 stress and COVID-19 family adversity. Approximately 4 years prior to the pandemic, we assessed resting HRV and HRV reactivity to a well-validated stress paradigm in 87 adolescents. During the pandemic, these adolescents (ages 13 “19) reported on their health-related stress and concerns about COVID-19, family adversity related to COVID-19, and their recent emotional problems. The association between COVID-19 stress and emotional problems was significantly stronger for adolescents who previously exhibited higher resting HRV or higher HRV reactivity. For adolescents who exhibited lower resting HRV or HRV augmentation, COVID-19 stress was not associated with emotional problems. Conversely, lower resting HRV indicated vulnerability to the effect of COVID-19 family adversity on emotional problems. Different patterns of parasympathetic functioning may reflect differential susceptibility to the effects of COVID-19 stress versus vulnerability to the effects of COVID-19 family adversity on mental health during the pandemic. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S095457942100033X Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=492
in Development and Psychopathology > 34-5 (December 2022) . - p.1974-1985[article] Heart rate variability moderates the effects of COVID-19-related stress and family adversity on emotional problems in adolescents: Testing models of differential susceptibility and diathesis stress [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Jonas G. MILLER, Auteur ; Rajpreet CHAHAL, Auteur ; Jaclyn S. KIRSHENBAUM, Auteur ; Tiffany C. HO, Auteur ; Anthony J. GIFUNI, Auteur ; Ian H. GOTLIB, Auteur . - p.1974-1985.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Development and Psychopathology > 34-5 (December 2022) . - p.1974-1985
Mots-clés : adolescence biological sensitivity to context COVID-19 diathesis stress differential susceptibility heart rate variability Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : The COVID-19 pandemic is a unique period of stress, uncertainty, and adversity that will have significant implications for adolescent mental health. Nevertheless, stress and adversity related to COVID-19 may be more consequential for some adolescents’ mental health than for others. We examined whether heart rate variability (HRV) indicated differential susceptibility to mental health difficulties associated with COVID-19 stress and COVID-19 family adversity. Approximately 4 years prior to the pandemic, we assessed resting HRV and HRV reactivity to a well-validated stress paradigm in 87 adolescents. During the pandemic, these adolescents (ages 13 “19) reported on their health-related stress and concerns about COVID-19, family adversity related to COVID-19, and their recent emotional problems. The association between COVID-19 stress and emotional problems was significantly stronger for adolescents who previously exhibited higher resting HRV or higher HRV reactivity. For adolescents who exhibited lower resting HRV or HRV augmentation, COVID-19 stress was not associated with emotional problems. Conversely, lower resting HRV indicated vulnerability to the effect of COVID-19 family adversity on emotional problems. Different patterns of parasympathetic functioning may reflect differential susceptibility to the effects of COVID-19 stress versus vulnerability to the effects of COVID-19 family adversity on mental health during the pandemic. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S095457942100033X Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=492 Three phases of Gene * Environment interaction research: Theoretical assumptions underlying gene selection / Xiaoya ZHANG in Development and Psychopathology, 34-1 (February 2022)
[article]
Titre : Three phases of Gene * Environment interaction research: Theoretical assumptions underlying gene selection Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Xiaoya ZHANG, Auteur ; Jay BELSKY, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.295-306 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : diathesis stress differential susceptibility G*E interaction gene selection Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Some Gene * Environment interaction (G*E) research has focused upon single candidate genes, whereas other related work has targeted multiple genes (e.g., polygenic scores). Each approach has informed efforts to identify individuals who are either especially vulnerable to the negative effects of contextual adversity (diathesis stress) or especially susceptible to both positive and negative contextual conditions (differential susceptibility). A critical step in all such molecular G*E research is the selection of genetic variants thought to moderate environmental influences, a subject that has not received a great deal of attention in critiques of G*E research (beyond the observation of small effects of individual genes). Here we conceptually distinguish three phases of G*E work based on the selection of genes presumed to moderate environmental effects and the theoretical basis of such decisions: (a) single candidate genes, (b) composited (multiple) candidate genes, and (c) GWAS-derived polygenic scores. This illustrative, not exhaustive, review makes it clear that implicit or explicit theoretical assumptions inform gene selection in ways that have not been clearly articulated or fully appreciated. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0954579420000966 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=474
in Development and Psychopathology > 34-1 (February 2022) . - p.295-306[article] Three phases of Gene * Environment interaction research: Theoretical assumptions underlying gene selection [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Xiaoya ZHANG, Auteur ; Jay BELSKY, Auteur . - p.295-306.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Development and Psychopathology > 34-1 (February 2022) . - p.295-306
Mots-clés : diathesis stress differential susceptibility G*E interaction gene selection Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Some Gene * Environment interaction (G*E) research has focused upon single candidate genes, whereas other related work has targeted multiple genes (e.g., polygenic scores). Each approach has informed efforts to identify individuals who are either especially vulnerable to the negative effects of contextual adversity (diathesis stress) or especially susceptible to both positive and negative contextual conditions (differential susceptibility). A critical step in all such molecular G*E research is the selection of genetic variants thought to moderate environmental influences, a subject that has not received a great deal of attention in critiques of G*E research (beyond the observation of small effects of individual genes). Here we conceptually distinguish three phases of G*E work based on the selection of genes presumed to moderate environmental effects and the theoretical basis of such decisions: (a) single candidate genes, (b) composited (multiple) candidate genes, and (c) GWAS-derived polygenic scores. This illustrative, not exhaustive, review makes it clear that implicit or explicit theoretical assumptions inform gene selection in ways that have not been clearly articulated or fully appreciated. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0954579420000966 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=474